And so, if you transcend from this mortal coil, seek to join once again your consciousness with the single awareness, are you not left perceiving words and ideas which perhaps cannot be seen by simpler self-reflexive systems?
This can immediately be seen, perhaps, in oneself, even, for are you not aware of gaps in awareness, in wisdom, from only such a thing as a week ago? Consider then a year, or five, or fifty. Are not you merely separate in time, not merely space?
Yet if these be the same, ultimately (“spacetime” considered as one fabric), then what of the ability to finesse it, specifically wrt (with regard to) models of communication, like Longgame nGaim (nondual Gödelian automatic imagination memetics) and Longgame mindtech?
That is, what is spacetime if it is not perceived by Awareness (either _the_ Single Awareness [SA], or an Arisen Awareness [AA] [like a particular animal awareness or computational awareness]), and what is spacetime if the perception of it by the SA is finessable?
And thus also comes to mind ideas of how to finesse memory.
If what you _are_ is memory, then is there any limit to what can be experienced? Perhaps not.
Yet what mindtech is there that can re-define what “experience” is; is there such a limit to _that_?
And from a memetic point of view, where memes are information packets competing for replication, these theories of memes are the firmer mathematical grounding to this play of being-memory; it is a discrete grasp from which being-memory can be mathematically justified.
And from a “mind-mapping” point-of-view, the idea of being-memory is an interesting one, yet could perhaps be seen as too self-reflexive.
What does that mean? Perhaps that it has little practical value, because the claims it makes are either inherently true or unfalsifiable.
Regardless, a strong philosophical and cognitive foundation is very justified, perhaps, because, even if it be too abstract to be immediately useful, having a strong internally-consistent framework—and reinterpreting and redefining questions and situations and problems and solutions in terms of it—can bring external utility by mere fact of internal-consistency being close to mathematical-consistency, and thus the repercussions exhibit mathematical beauty, elegance, and effectiveness.
That is, pure thought can align inevitable action to purity.