and if we see the issue, if we look at the issue from the right angle, then we can see certain features made prominent, and so gain insight into the perhaps less-perceived dimensionality of the situation
that is, if the goal is to understand an issue, perhaps of memory hacking (you are purely memory and entirely finessable), then it might be useful to do a sort of “twisting around” of the subject in a hyperdimensional space; hold the whole concept in your mind at once and spin it around, turn it and reshape it so that new perceptions can be had
and so with regard to memory hacking itself, then, if the goal is to hold that concept in mind as a hyperdimensional object and rotate it in space, it might be useful to boil down the parts of the concept and hold them individually, and then hold their interactions as well, after becoming more adept with the composable functions
and so, what are some of the more fundamental of functions (that is, mathematical functions [i.e., (= sameInput sameOutput)]) of memory hacking?
perhaps it could be said: you are purely memory, you are entirely finessable
and so what does it mean to be “purely memory”? what does it mean to be “entirely finessable”?
perhaps from the viewpoint of mathematical functions, being “purely memory” means being purely information, being purely the _interrelation_ between substrates, rather than being the substrate itself
(these are very interesting progressions.)
whether these descriptions are completely apt is perhaps less important compared to whether they push forward the ability to have more fun and interesting memories
perhaps being “entirely finessable” means that there is no core-self, no part within that is not subject to hacking, that is too deep to affect.
again, whether these models are inherently “correct” is not the question; the point is to make more fun and interesting memories, and perhaps these models have the potency to advance that cause.
so, then, more fundamental functions that describe some of the fundamentals of memory hacking could perhaps be related to being purely the relation _between_ substrates (“purely memory”), and all of the relationships being at a high level that are all accessible (“entirely finessable”).
and how to map these more to the structure of mathematical functions? that is, where a function has the quality of “(= sameInput sameOutput)”?
in some sense perhaps it can be that these definitions sort of “test” for attributes of a situation; it can also be that they return advice/strategies for how to deal with particular inputs: take in a mindteching situation and return a reframe so that it’s seen as purely relationships between patterns, and return how the relationships are high enough level to affect.
and thus, with those simple functions of memory hacking, perhaps these can be further composed with other aspects of memory hacking, and different aspects can be held in a hyperdimensional space and rotated in order to gain more perspective and advance further.