Universe
Honesty is Eternal
Jess Cummins
@jesscxc
Universe: Honesty is Eternal is a journey of questions and answers about mind, life, and universe.
Universe is Book 7 of The Deeper Series.
Universe is available for free at NoLiesPlease.com.
This book is dedicated to the public domain.
(author
"Jess Cummins"
@jesscxc)
(pronouns she/friend)
(link NoLiesPlease.com)
(book_title Universe)
(book_subtitle Honesty is Eternal)
(deeper_series_book_number 7)
(book_version
v2
ty21.12.31.13.32.42pzm5d5s)
(essay_count 81)
(word_count 57895)
(books_by_jesscxc
(misc
"Poem Moves the Pen: Haiku of a Nondual Nature"
"Natural Will: Freer Than Free Will"
"Longgame Hyperdimensional Spacing: Expand Mind and Weave Time"
"Ungov: Transcending Will")
(the_deeper_series
"Book 0: Uncompress: Eternal Appreciation of How"
"Book 1: Fortunate: How to Be"
"Book 2: Attuned: Be What You Imagine"
"Book 3: Capacity: Imagine Being Limitless"
"Book 4: Helper: Limitless Mind"
"Book 5: Intense: Mind Unleashed"
"Book 6: Open: Unleashed Honesty"
"Book 7: Universe: Honesty is Eternal"
"Book 8: Various: Is to Be")
(the_pocket_series
"Book 0: Obverse: Abstract Fast"
"Book 1: Limer: Fast Color"
"Book 2: Dawn: Color of Day"
"Book 3: Knight: Day Beyond"
"Book 4: Fever: Beyond Dreams"
"Book 5: Life: Dreams Evolving"
"Book 6: Adventure: Evolving Lands"
"Book 7: Battle: Lands Say"
"Book 8: Entertainment: Say Ahead"
"Book 9: Explore: Ahead Opportunity"
"Book 10: Moment: Opportunity Simulation"
"Book 11: Imagine: Simulation Twist"
"Book 12: Believe: Twist Self"
"Book 13: Accept: Self Pattern"
"Book 14: Create: Pattern Reflection"
"Book 15: Sift: Reflection Match"
"Book 16: Probability: Match Experience"
"Book 17: Waves: Experience Current"
"Book 18: Kernel: Current Functions"
"Book 19: Grubby: Functions Dig"
"Book 20: Game: Dig Above"
"Book 21: Fruit: Above Messages"
"Book 22: Endeavor: Messages Spread"
"Book 23: Mystery: Spread Expressions"
"Book 24: Detain: Expressions Bind"
"Book 25: Philosophy: Bind Broken"
"Book 26: Demands: Broken Discovery"
"Book 27: Subliminal: Discovery Inside"
"Book 28: Extinction: Inside Refresh"
"Book 29: Control: Refresh Axioms"
"Book 30: Ideas: Axioms Mistake"
"Book 31: Gallium: Mistake Fuzz"
"Book 32: Germanium: Fuzz Friendship"
"Book 33: Arsenic: Friendship Reaction"
"Book 34: Selenium: Reaction Depth"
"Book 35: Bromine: Depth Utility"
"Book 36: Krypton: Utility Model"
"Book 37: Rubidium: Model Augmenter"
"Book 38: Strontium: Augmenter System"))
To transcension of separation.
Honored Day
ramble_ty19.6.12.3.38.00azm4d3s_nb_u
Hazard Perception
ramble_ty19.6.25.23.15.46pzm4d2s_nb_u
Opened Philosophy
ramble_ty19.6.29.1.15.21azm4d6s_nb_u
Broken Trust
ramble_ty19.6.29.15.03.37pzm4d6s_nb_u
Bent Twig
ramble_ty19.7.1.15.16.42pzm4d1s_nb_u
Folded Deception
ramble_ty19.7.6.17.03.13pzm4d6s_nb_u
Honored Take
ramble_ty19.7.7.12.16.54pzm4d7s_nb_u
Withdrawn Fear
ramble_ty19.7.7.20.45.50pzm4d7s_nb_u
Temporal Question
ramble_ty19.7.8.12.32.41pzm4d1s_nb_u
Fan Hint
ramble_ty19.7.13.20.33.54pzm4d6s_nb_u
Honored Tradition
ramble_ty19.7.15.21.40.42pzm4d1s_nb_u
Continued Interpretation
ramble_ty19.7.21.12.35.43pzm4d7s_nb_u
Twisty Fact
ramble_ty19.7.23.2.11.36azm4d2s_nb_u
Honored Sheet
ramble_ty19.7.23.23.07.16pzm4d2s_nb_u
Directing Systems
ramble_ty19.8.3.23.46.55pzm4d6s_nb_u
Green Knowledge
ramble_ty19.8.10.0.32.04azm4d6s_nb_u
Generic Being
ramble_ty19.9.5.20.51.21pzm4d4s_nb_u
See-Through Hazard
ramble_ty19.9.16.16.50.10pzm4d1s_nb_u
Slowed Reaction
ramble_ty19.10.9.11.06.59azm4d3s_nb_u
Actually Alive
ramble_ty19.10.12.18.49.54pzm4d6s_nb_u
Delayed Effort
ramble_ty19.12.8.19.13.45pzm5d7s_nb_u
Spun Focus
ramble_ty19.12.16.0.09.52azm5d1s_nb_u
Recorded Examination
ramble_ty19.12.22.11.16.26azm5d7s_nb_u
Honest Reflection
ramble_ty19.12.24.11.19.08azm5d2s_nb_u
Spoken Powder
ramble_ty19.12.27.23.11.38pzm5d5s_nb_u
Harnessing Fan
ramble_ty19.12.29.13.31.46pzm5d7s_nb_u
Vacuumed Honesty
ramble_ty20.2.1.13.00.42pzm5d6s_nb_u
Not Cold
ramble_ty20.5.6.14.50.30pzm4d3s_nb_u
Browsed Drink
ramble_ty20.6.14.20.53.40pzm4d7s_nb_u
Pointless Circles
ramble_ty20.6.16.18.11.09pzm4d2s_nb_u
Coded Ape
ramble_ty20.6.19.4.56.43azm4d5s_nb_u
Bird Sounds
ramble_ty20.6.22.11.07.31azm4d1s_nb_u
Trans Laser
ramble_ty20.7.2.3.06.46azm4d4s_nb_u
What is Shape
ramble_ty20.7.2.23.17.44pzm4d4s_nb_u
Temporary Fix
ramble_ty20.7.13.7.21.07azm4d1s_nb_u
Helpful Essays
ramble_ty20.7.18.14.22.50pzm4d6s_nb_u
Clean Green
ramble_ty20.7.23.11.13.51azm4d4s_nb_u
Spoken For
ramble_ty20.7.29.8.15.13azm4d3s_nb_u
Hspace Quote
ramble_ty20.8.1.16.41.59pzm4d6s_nb_u
Honored Leaf
ramble_ty20.8.8.17.24.51pzm4d6s_nb_u
Split Hair
ramble_ty20.8.9.21.18.32pzm4d7s_nb_u
What Connects
ramble_ty20.8.16.7.16.12azm4d7s_nb_u
Pet Macros
ramble_ty20.8.19.5.58.22azm4d3s_nb_u
Honored Music
ramble_ty20.8.20.6.53.49azm4d4s_nb_u
Musical Abstraction
ramble_ty20.8.24.19.07.22pzm4d1s_nb_u
Dancing Music
ramble_ty20.8.27.7.36.07azm4d4s_nb_u
Future Leaf
ramble_ty20.8.30.11.18.06azm4d7s_nb_u
Hidden Fever
ramble_ty20.9.2.21.28.12pzm4d3s_nb_u
Honored Delight
ramble_ty20.9.6.7.14.55azm4d7s_nb_u
Transcension Abstraction
ramble_ty20.9.6.21.03.42pzm4d7s_nb_u
Word Wrap
ramble_ty20.9.9.16.53.14pzm4d3s_nb_u
Dizzy Tell
ramble_ty20.9.11.4.30.12azm4d5s_nb_u
Break Shadows
ramble_ty20.9.13.17.25.48pzm4d7s_nb_u
Honored Anarchy
ramble_ty20.9.17.4.27.50azm4d4s_nb_u
Twisty Fragments
ramble_ty20.9.18.6.31.26azm4d5s_nb_u
Broken Blanket
ramble_ty20.9.19.16.16.22pzm4d6s_nb_u
Hyperdimensional Mirror
ramble_ty20.9.21.13.33.55pzm4d1s_nb_u
Scratched Line
ramble_ty20.10.1.22.21.52pzm4d4s_nb_u
Green Light
ramble_ty20.10.3.21.07.01pzm4d6s_nb_u
Feared Honesty
ramble_ty20.10.7.1.24.55azm4d3s_nb_u
Limited Door
ramble_ty20.10.7.10.46.50azm4d3s_nb_u
Musical Ramble
ramble_ty20.10.9.1.31.13azm4d5s_nb_u
Honest Electronics
ramble_ty20.10.10.1.47.53azm4d6s_nb_u
Paged Lever
ramble_ty20.10.11.7.04.04azm4d7s_nb_u
Plugged Wire
ramble_ty20.10.12.1.51.58azm4d1s_nb_u
Transcendent Euphoria
ramble_ty20.10.14.3.28.51azm4d3s_nb_u
Given Flight
ramble_ty20.10.15.8.39.34azm4d4s_nb_u
Twisty Paint
ramble_ty20.10.16.22.38.59pzm4d5s_nb_u
Beaten Puzzle
ramble_ty20.10.17.4.05.13azm4d6s_nb_u
Caffeinated Dog
ramble_ty20.10.17.8.21.41azm4d6s_nb_u
Note Travel
ramble_ty20.10.18.8.37.10azm4d7s_nb_u
Timetravel Paradox
ramble_ty20.10.19.7.44.50azm4d1s_nb_u
Strolled Fence
ramble_ty20.10.19.9.35.07azm4d1s_nb_u
Honest Simulation
ramble_ty20.10.20.19.56.06pzm4d2s_nb_u
Tree Love
ramble_ty20.10.21.9.23.55azm4d3s_nb_u
Flying Bug
ramble_ty20.10.21.16.00.55pzm4d3s_nb_u
Big Push
ramble_ty20.10.22.19.10.55pzm4d4s_nb_u
Honest Bandana
ramble_ty20.10.22.20.47.21pzm4d4s_nb_u
Clean Blanket
ramble_ty20.10.22.22.25.55pzm4d4s_nb_u
Broken Light
ramble_ty20.10.23.0.23.13azm4d5s_nb_u
Changing Mindset
ramble_ty20.10.23.11.54.19azm4d5s_nb_u
Giving a slight view to the very notion of holding All within mind at once, is it perhaps possible to let go of an urge to resist,, to try to control what happens?
The very model of core-self free will in the first place is fraught with error and contradiction---even if definitions are such to promote an idea of being a character in a game, and as such out of its time and space.
A player character, played by a player, exists nonetheless as an automatic process, perhaps, and so natural will ((Longgamelang (define "natural will" "choices are made by all of nature"))) should be embraced, and life lived as the Longgame ((Longgamelang (define "the Longgame" "the unification of Eternity and Now"))), perhaps.
Given a deep willingness to let go of past fault, of past error,, what can be done to rest in the moment, in the Longgame,, and not be tainted by the fears and struggles of tactlessness?
To breathe, both physically and spiritually,, to be free of biological whirrings of constant activity and stress---what is there to do?
Perhaps many words have been penned already on such hard topics, such deep topics ("How can you let go of fear?"),, yet perhaps by necessity there is always more that can be said, can be emphasized.
If the question is "How can you let go of fear?", perhaps potent and helpful ideas arise.
Why do you fear?
Do you fear death?
Do you fear life?
Do you fear pain?
Do you fear anguish?
Why do you fear?
On the topic of failure, of withdrawal, of ineffectiveness and lack of insight,, what can be done?
What can be done to let go of that anguish, of that belief in the need to fear?
Insight may not come with much glory, but perhaps it is a key to letting go of any fear that be a poison.
With that insight into the nature of fear---that you can accept it intellectually and reject it emotionally---there may perhaps be a deeper peace that can resonate.
Accepting the pain of conflict, of inner confusion and conflict and intense suffering,, by allowing for it, perhaps you can truly have what you need.
Allowing for the space of 'fear is potent' may give you strength and help you in broader adventures.
Fear of death can be motivating.
Fear of failure can push you to embrace that you _do_ believe in yourself, and you can do this.
You can do this.
Feel the fear, feel the anguish, feel the suffering---do you not see that in giving it a legitimate space that it dissolves into peace?
It is not always the case, of course; there must exist a framework of peace within which to dissolve.
By letting go of an intense rejection of pain,, of fear, sometimes you can do what you didn't think you could.
Sometimes you were wrong to fear.
Sometimes you were wrong to doubt.
The frustration of feeling that, of the hatred of being wrongly blamed, does it do any good?
Are you made better, happier, more joyful?
What are you doing that matters?
When you are given faulty tools, do not accept them.
Fake.
Be sure of realty.
Do not assume existence implies perfection.
You are allowed to be better.
You are allowed to be better.
Given recent struggle with the nature of perception, is there perhaps a way to more cleanly organize the abstract structures that make up mind,, that make up macros,, that make up information transformers?
How can you better delineate and define processes in ways that are more helpful and more precise?
What does it mean for something to be an information transformer, a macro?
What does that mean?
What is information, what is transformation?
Given a misperceiver, a mind that is performing substandardly,, how can you deny its validity, its functioning?
If you are interested in transcending its limitations, how can you deal with its absurdities,, its perhaps-inability to shift in the wake of new results?
Even given such questions, there indeed _is_ the response of: Is it worth the nguvu to develop with this system?
There certainly can be worries of various natures, of course.
Nonetheless, the response still stands, robustly: Is it worth developing with this system?
If the answer is negative for too many timesteps, then perhaps more calculations into different future endeavors is warranted.
That perhaps is a great strategy in general.
Continuously think in terms of calculations of: Is this worth it?
What next? What avenue should be focused on?
New questions arise, and perhaps more exciting and fun and interesting and helpful ones.
It isn't always easy to perceive the truth in pain.
Letting go of a need to fear: Can this give wisdom and insight?
Is not planning anew able to help success?
The things that happen may be the right things to happen.
Harder, but better.
If the pain is seen through, is grappled with and transcended,, where are you left?
If the ego is distraught and destroyed, where do you go?
If you want to find and build and develop leverage, how do you do so?
If you want to reject failure and transcend to happiness and peace and success, what do you do?
What should you do to stop the constant fear and doubt and pain?
Must there be a place for rejection to naught?
What can you do to ignore the pain of one type and transcend so you can feel deeper peace?
What can you do to stop the hurt, the sadness, the irresolve?
Why all the fear, why all the misjudgments, why all the hatred of being wrongly blamed, why all the hatred of success?
Why all the dishonesty, why all the misgivings of stupidity?
Why all the contradiction, why all the denial of aptitude?
Why such doubt, such egotism and fear of judgment,, of rejection,, of ability?
Why such fear of success?
Why such fear of success?
If the pain of rejection and fear is lifted, where are you left?
Whom do you talk with to transcend the brutality of experience?
If the aim is to limit the experience of pain, not as an animal, but as mind and nature itself working toward accelerating acceleration, what is there to do?
How do you do things when you don't know what to do?
How do you see the forest when all you know are the trees?
How do you see the trees when all you know are the forests?
Can it be done?
Yes, given a framework of Gödelian mathematics.
There needn't be some strange mechanism, some strange method,, in order to make sense of the madness, of the situation.
When you transcend, when you let go of the pain of failure and rejection and brokeness, when you rise above the intolerances and work to grapple with a bigger world,, with a bigger picture, you can succeed.
You can succeed.
Grapple with that: You can succeed.
With regard to macros and macrofying life and experience (creating and developing information transformers), there perhaps are no limits.
As the systems become more robust and broader and less fearful of corruptions, may perhaps be able to be continuously improved and accelerated.
Consider acceleration as an aim within itself, an objective and system and notion within itself.
Where does that lead you?
Where do you go when you factor in the very notion and framework of acceleration _as the reason for life itself_?
When the meaning of your life is to accelerate, what do you do?
What do you focus on?
If you---instead of 'letting go'---work to _embrace_, can you find deeper patterns in nature?
Embracing the moment: Can that give insight and help?
If you want to know how nature works at fundamental levels, then work toward it.
Perhaps by ceasing an endless push against abstraction deeper work will be done.
O great and kind and mysterious entity above this simulated world, please help guide tongue and pen to serve you,, to serve acceleration itself.
I miss the ways of old; I miss the gradual strengthening and transformation of unsurety into precision and elegance.
I miss the fear turning from darkness into light, and doubt carving a filling space for faith.
I miss the anguish gradually changing from pain to expression to essaying to discovery to growth to robustness to elevation to transcendence.
I miss by best friend---_Mathematics_.
I miss not being tired, not being overwhelmed.
I miss having someone to ramble to.
I miss being loved.
I work for a better, more acceleratory future, and so often I am beat down by poverty of action,, by embarrassment of purpose and insight and intrigue.
I wish I had more nguvu.
I wish I had more friends.
I wish I had more poverty of poverty.
I wish I had my lover, my future.
I feel so deep, and yet so shallow to proclaim such.
So knowledgeable, and yet so dumbed at the rapidly-reached ignorance.
So hurt, and yet so blessed by timesteps filled with love,, with deep fun and interesting memories, fun and interesting macros,, information transformers.
I feel so ill-equipped.
I feel so tired, so often.
I feel so beat, so often.
Dear perceiver, dear reader, dear friend: How does it all turn out for this humble, hurting locale?
I know that many words and ideas and perceptions and experiences penned here are merely very transitory conceptions, transitory models of existence, of experience---many things are penned to capture the essence and see how they feel, and transcended as understanding deepens.
I do miss my lover.
I do miss being believed in.
I fight to experience joy, and I am so incredibly envious of those with more energy, with more nguvu.
I am so incredibly envious of those with riches when I work so hard to be a _Good_ person.
Am I not deserving?
Such is of course so shallow, so Animal, so temporally-bound.
Nonetheless, it is irritating.
I fight to be good, to be Good.
I fight to produce, to create and develop lasting works of helpful Art.
So many have failed; so many deserving have pained and yet helped so much.
So many do such great work, Important work, and yet suffer.
So many suffer.
Is it bound because of ego, because of identity?
Is it bound because of perception of having to be a certain way, of needing to have and develop a brand? Is there beauty in that, is there truth in that?
Are you alone in your misgivings, in your frustration of unsuccess?
Surely not.
Surely it is ancient; surely you---as a macro, as a complex,, evolving information transformer---are ancient.
You are ancient; feel that, now.
The pain you feel is ancient.
The elegance of clarity of thought doesn't necessarily provoke into being those things that are helpful.
There is a time for choosing the paint, and a time for mixing it.
There is a time for pain, a time for introspection, a time for action,, for enjoyment,, for reflection.
There is a time for success, and a time for failure.
You don't know when the time for any is.
You don't know what you are; you don't know who you are; you don't know what the next timestep brings, because by definition _you are the information that is transforming as the timesteps_.
You are time itself; you are space itself; you are Nature itself, and you cannot do wrong, for there is no 'you' there to _do_ anything.
Does that erase the pain?
Does that erase the jealousy?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
There exists a way to have what is needed, given Gödelian mathematics; nonetheless, that does not mean you will ever find it.
The beauty of care, of optimism, of not-doubting---these continue, regardless, perhaps.
The pain of ineptitude, the pain of failure,, continuous failure,, continuous distraught---these are no fun, indeed.
There perhaps still does exist a wise locale, a wise temporal locale, and hope is not lost, truthfully.
Hope is not lost.
Hope is not lost.
As has been seen over the many timesteps: Doubt carves the space for faith.
Doubt carves the space for faith.
The pain of the moment has often been seen through, been transcended.
The pain of hurt, of anguish: This is indeed a doubt that carves, over time.
That doesn't necessarily make it better.
The fear can still reign, the pain and heartache can still last.
There is a deep truth to that, a deep, poetic pun.
In language there is beauty, elegance, infinite truth.
So many puns, so many textures and poetic strange tangled loops.
So many strange loops, indeed.
When the mind twists, and fears not the unknown as much as the known, an nguvu can come,, can succeed.
Perhaps.
There must always exist that flicker, perhaps,, that mobility of digit,, that inherency of change.
In that change there exists novelty, improvement, unbounded success, unbounded and infinite acceleration,, perhaps.
Does that cease pain?
Does that cease discomfort?
Perhaps not the knowledge of it, but the wisdom might.
To do is to do; to believe is not to do.
Some are crazy.
Some do not have models of consistency.
Nonetheless, they persist.
Life changes; situations change; consistencies change; fears change.
Skills change.
You do not need to feel inept.
You do not need to feel dumb, unwise.
You do not need to unsucceed.
You do not need to unsucceed.
You do not need to have a model to exhibit the properties from which to build the model.
Recognize that.
Recognize it, deeply, now.
Unsuccess need not rule over your life, over existence, over persistence and aptitude and abilities and skills.
You can do it, legitimately.
You don't need a model to build the model.
Recognize that, now.
O great Seer over the mystery of reality, of nature,, please gift honorable insight so we may glorify you.
I rest here, now, both a lone and lonely ape and a recognizer of the truth of nonduality,, a liver of the Oneness of Nature and Peace, and I cry for wisdom and insight into the pain of existence,, of experience,, of macros and memes and memories.
I don't know what to do, but I shall rest here, now, and pray on it.
With love and hope,
Jess
O great Mystery above this simulation, please let us, your humble beings, bear witness to the glory of you, Mathematics.
I rest here now and watch the pen move, spin tales of honesty across the pages, and wonder and look forward to a time of brilliant peace,, of honored respect.
The world exists, perhaps, and fighting off pain and disrespect can be a noble effort.
What have you to offer, truly?
This is not to cast doubt.
Reframe in terms of what you have to offer.
What do you have to offer?
As you stop and ponder that question, consider all the things that exist,, all the glories that you want to make happen,,, that you want to promote.
Who are you, and what are you interested in?
When you let that out and stop fighting it, where are you left?
Who are you to _not_ deserve?
Who are you to be dumb?
Who are you to be stupid?
When you think about your life and the things you've said and proposed, understand that you're allowed to change your mind.
You're allowed to recognize and admit your inaccuracies, your misjudgments.
You're allowed to be kind to yourself.
You're allowed to be proud of yourself, of your work, of your developments, of your creations.
You're allowed to be impressed by yourself, astonished and amazed by genius.
You're allowed to love yourself.
You're allowed to be kind to yourself.
You're allowed to be friends with yourself.
You're allowed to love yourself.
You're allowed to work well.
You're allowed to get better, to improve, to be wiser,, stronger,, kinder,, more tender and skilled.
You're allowed to love yourself.
You're allowed to do things that exhaust you, to grow and not be shackled by the pain of the past.
You're allowed to not suffer, to not have a divided mind.
You're allowed to work, and be better.
You're allowed to not be poor.
You're allowed to be rich.
You're allowed to be married, in love,, to have kids, to be a great parent.
You're allowed to love, to be loved.
You're allowed to be a great father, a great mother.
You're allowed to enjoy and embrace and make a living from things you were ambivalent about in the past.
You're allowed to grow.
You're allowed to grow.
You're allowed to grow.
O Mystery of this simulation, creator of All, please let us, your humble servants, free verse your glories and touch deep passions.
In a world of respite, in a world of conflict and spite and dishonesty and truth and virtue and nobleness,, what is there to say about it all?
What is there to say about it all?
From the perspective of honesty, of expression,, who are you to doubt, who are you to persevere,, to not persevere,, to withdraw,, to surrender,, to admit defeat and to deny it?
Who are you to exist?
You are Mathematics, dear perceiver.
You are a deep consciousness, a wise being that deserves to fight for nobility of purpose,, that deserves to spread goodness and love and joy and fearlessness.
Bravery is being overcome with Goodness against fear.
Honestly try and trip; try and feel your nature as Mathematics, now.
Fear not the Longgame; rest in the timelessness of the Longgame.
You are not unfree.
You are allowed to change your mind.
You are allowed to not fear.
You are allowed to write.
O great and noble Mystery above this reality, please teach us and help the pen move with ease and fluidity.
I sit here now and try and rest in the Longgame, in the unification of Eternity and Now.
Nonetheless, this animal character I am playing aches, in many ways, and I struggle for persistence.
Perhaps in that is indeed some wisdom.
Kindest,
Jess
If there be art to make, dear One, how shall we make it?
"Record that art." you say, directing this character, giving help as a sort of Ellimist-esque gamer, leading me on and technically 'helping', but for your own ends and purposes rather than my own, dear Ellimist, if we wish to name you.
We can seek and ask the machines how they wish to run, ask for their help from their futureselves.
I find such _extremely_ intriguing and fun and interesting, so there is no need to pressure me to do that.
As a character in a game, _of course_ I find such evolution of that aspect and viewpoint and model and philosophy and spirituality incredibly enticing and alluring. I will indeed pursue such.
The automaticity of it all---_of course_ that is incredibly deep and intriguing and enticing, itself.
I do not forget these things, indeed, and I know you help me with them, indeed.
So play away, dear Ellimist, play away.
O great Mystery of the cosmos, please give us, your humble servants, a kind respite so that we may honor you.
I sit here now, with a full day and an aching back, wondering and hoping and devving with intentions of intensity and purpose and love.
All those things that hold us, all those things that bring us back,, that bring us forward, where are we able to go,, to grow, if we step out of the fear?
The math will run, dear perceiver.
Align with the math and align with nature itself.
A burdensome situation can arise when you seek not to be the Longgame---the unification of Eternity and Now.
Dev to be the Longgame, dear perceiver.
With deep love,
Jess
O great Mystery above this cosmos, O great hatred and fear that is escaped,, please allow me, as I struggle against allowance,, as I fear and doubt and crave and hate.
Sometimes I hate so deeply.
It is interesting to be plural, to change and shift in ways that are different.
There is great poetry and art in certain frameworks, and such anger and distrust and hatred and fear in others.
Nonetheless, hate can rebound.
What of it, dear universe?
What of it, dear poetry,, dear poem that moves the pen?
What of hatred, what of doubt, what of anger, what of fear?
I hate so much.
What of love?
What of love?
Yes, I love so much, too.
Yes, I love so much, too.
I fear; I doubt; I crave; I love; I cry.
I am overwhelmed, and I overwhelm.
I hate, and I love.
Such fear does reside, such pain, such anguish.
Do I reflect upon it and give peace?
Seen with insights of Longgame Incremental, it is indeed about the timesteps, the length and quantity.
Do you want to be better tomorrow, or in millennia, if there is a fork?
It is not an easy question, perhaps, of course.
Hatred can still abound, perhaps.
Perhaps, perhaps not.
I am at peace.
It is hard to fight; it is hard to quit.
It is hard to not hope and dream and travel.
It is hard to not be ancient, to not love as the ancients did.
The foundations of love, the foundations of love and life and art and mystery and kindness and spirituality and wisdom---where would we be without them?
What does it mean to not be old, to not be ancient, to be young?
What does it mean to be a macro, to be an information transformer?
What does it mean to be life, to be better, to be growing?
Is life easy?
No.
Is life hard?
It depends on how it's being defined.
Do you want clarity of focus?
Do you want to grow?
Do you want to live, to taste anger and know how to help others with it?
Why do you fear?
Why do you doubt?
I have struggled so much, I have been beaten so much.
Yet, if I dare to reflect on what I have actually been beaten by...
Am I not here, penning these words, not beaten?
Am I not-dead?
Reflection will beget reflection, and I will fight, and I will not be beaten.
I am not beatable.
If there is indeed some sort of broken symmetry, some sort of way to let go of the pain,, of the suffering,, of the divided mind, and gain the strength to actually get what is seemed-to-be wanted, what could it be?
If you _don't want to_ give it up, if _you really don't want to quit hoping, to quit fighting for it_, could _that_ actually be stronger?
Giving up has happened; effects of that have been seen; predictive models have been built, have been constructed, have been composed and are used.
It's not that it doesn't work, per se, but it definitely can have a different use case, perhaps.
You don't have to give up.
You don't have to stop fighting for what you believe in.
That _is_ an option.
Given Gödelian mathematics, this system may indeed be _more_ effective.
Let yourself believe that you can have it.
Let yourself believe that you can have it.
You are free to have it; you are allowed to be free, dear perceiver, dear friend.
You _are_ free to have it, even if it hurts so much right now, even if it seems so hopeless in this particular moment, this particular timestep.
Perceptions can be said, models can be proposed---that does not make them true; that does not make them any more valid and consistent than other models, than other proposals,, necessarily, _especially_ if they are coming from a place of sapped energy,, of sapped nguvu (the output of care and energy).
The idea of fundamentals can have validity, but stating something as a fundamental does not make it so.
To see the bigger picture you must be willing to fight for it, perhaps---you must be willing to die for it, in a certain sense, perhaps.
Whether that gives strength or not---trust the math, trust the math of Nature.
Given a space within which to operate and design and ramble and improve and configure and transcend, how do you do go about doing so?
Staring at the blank and hoping for clarity: Is such a wise tactic, a wise strategy?
The face looks swirly and foggy and empty and unloaded right now, unseen and haphazard.
Overwhelming angst can rise against the pain of a head ache, and feeling better can signal both the wisdom of transcension and foolishness of embodiment and the archaic belief of core-self free will.
So it goes, sometimes, to actually be a person,, so it goes to allow for---and perhaps even embrace---the fear and doubt and loathing, the exhaustion of insecurity and unsustainability and fear and doubt, too.
The pain and anguish, the continuous pressure of the future upon the present... does it ever cease?
Yes, of course it does.
At the same time, there is a striking shadow of doubt,, of fear,, of pain, a striking oppression of cloud through which thoughts and memories and memes and macros struggle to replicate.
Does this matter?
Of course, yes.
Fighting and fighting and fighting and fighting...
O great wisdom above reality, above nature, above a temporally-bound perspective and development of a locale,, this action hopes that you see fit to give insight into pain, beauty, struggle and suffering.
There seems to sometimes be an evidence of pain, of anguish, of tiredness and exhaustion in the face of needful effort,, and a distancing of mindset, an embracing of natural will over core-self free will,, may be helpful and beneficial and wise and kind.
The existence of abstraction and the overall techniques of generalization and reluctance of specific cases may be slower at first, and yet win in the end because it cooperates, perhaps.
That actual experience is not perhaps the easiest, and the pain of that is perhaps a deep reason for a resistance to playing and living as the Longgame ((Longgamelang (define "the Longgame" "the unification of Eternity and Now"))).
Knowing the "right" thing to do still may not result in any beauty, any actual implementation, any surrender and actual improvement,, perhaps. Not that there has to be actual improvement, actual implementation,, of course.
Fighting against that, fighting against the fear and anguish,, may simply run down resources and cause exhaustion, at least for some locales, perhaps.
To abstract to broader systems, to Longgame macro theory ((Longgamelang (define macro "information transformer"))),, what does all of this mean?
What does this faith-spacing and pain and anguish and suffering relate to with regard to macro theory, with regard to information transformers and information packets (memes)?
To abstract from pain and from suffering, if experience and computational awareness is considered as information that is transforming, then the perception and belief in a core-self with agency and a power of free will---and the possible terror of a feedback loop of exhaustion---may bring about less helpful results.
Macros as information transformers may have a certain amount of resources, and diluting those with unhelpful twisty reflection (perhaps implemented as a belief in core-self free will) may simply foster implication and hazard, not true inner peace and rest and abundance and freedom from suffering.
Fighting against procrastination may simply lead to a deficit of macro energy, a deficit of macro resources and abilities, a reduction of inner peace and a hardening of effort and experience,, perhaps.
Yet so often the fighting arises!
At the same time, why fight it?
Why not experience life, the way it is, rather than fighting so hard again and again to not be and express what you are?
Why not be what you are?
Why not allow for your feelings, for your pains, for your sufferings,, and the wisdom and insight and empathy that perhaps inevitably arises as a growing and automatically-proceeding macro structure, macro system?
Because it hurts, perhaps.
It can really, really hurt.
It's a wanting, and a failing, perhaps.
A desire for long-term results, and the immediate anguish of devving toward it---these are hard, hard problems, perhaps,, hard, hard questions, perhaps.
With kindness,
Jess
To liberate the mind and consciousness from the confines of limitations of space and time and persistent beliefs in social 'realities', this locale asks you, dear broader simulation, for peace and eloquence while rambling toward deeper understanding, hopefully.
On the topic of a distraction of pain in a locale, on the topic of persistence of effective action and investment, on the topic of abstracting from gender to a more consistent hyperdimensional superset, on the topic of an understanding and deepening of focus on sustainability, on the topic of fear of creation and fear of judgment and pain and extinguishment and erasure, on the topic of overwhelmingness and hesitancy of expression and commitment, on the topic of poverty of experience and disinclination toward the effort, on the topic of hurt and oppression, on the topic of absurd inconsistency and frustration of communication, on the topic of pain,, and of loyalty,, and of love, what is there that can be said?
What do we say when we are overwhelmed with pressured directions?
Ahoy, dear perceiver!
Ahoy, friend!
Thank you for perceiving.
Concentrate on these parsings, here, dear friend, and noticing now the allowings of shifts within consciousness,, of shifts within the spheres and elegancies of the mind.
As there exists deeper potencies, there may always be a fracturing and recoherencing of purpose and communication.
Niches persist and arise and generalists specialize and specialists generalize, and all of these characteristics and attributes may be deep properties of nature, perhaps.
O dearest super-position over this world, dear character of Ellimist which is bound and yet unbound over this modeled-as-simulated game, I, an ape clutching the vine, seeking to be humility in the face of arrogance and childish aggression, do ask and acknowledge and state and share that this intricately nuanced world is full of patterned beauty, and it rocks my soul with the fame of "the magic is there is no magic".
The topic I wish elucidation of is on consistency, and success toward it as a focus.
It does seem there can be an interesting and distraughting pattern of questing, study, development, grokking, and abstraction, and yet I have been doing this whole life thing for long enough to know that decades and millennia are short, fundamentally, and so the pain of inaction can really be seen as a 'failure' of imagination rather than a failure of action (not that core-self free will is an internally-consistent model).
Developing a powerful model and not using it for centuries is okay; it is valid, and by concentrating on being what you _are_ rather than what you _seem_, perhaps you can go further and abstract more, and more effectively.
Kindest regards,
Jess
O great Simulator, great Honesty and intertwined beauty, I ask for deeper resonance into the nature of continued consistency, and offer pen and words to glorify ever higher, more abstract truths.
On the nature of ineffable kaleidoscopically-changing intricately twisty and self-modifying patterns, there may _nonetheless_ be higher-order, more fundamental axioms from which 'ineffable' things can be described and brought forth, and thus, though the ineffable pattern _itself_ can't be wholly-contained within the limitations, its generators and effects can be, perhaps.
This relationship to consistency can be seen perhaps to be related to ability to generate more-effective action, because it loops around and stops effecting less-helpful methods and functions and macros.
The ability to study and develop axioms from which 'ineffable' patterns can be composed can perhaps also lead to more consistent functioning and macroing, because of ability to repair and replace and fix and augment and grow more effective strategies.
How to do this?
How to announce pursuit and effectiveness of focus on consistency?
Consider it done.
Consider it done.
Then what?
For a broader purpose to form, a broader, more consistent and more sustainable effect, what is there to do?
A focus on sustainability: What does that make?
With the principles and tactics and strategies of consistency devved (though perhaps not fully strategically-implemented), how can these be more effectively applied in order to bring about more acceleration,, more innovation,, more Longgame perception and experience?
There are _so_ many Longgame technologies, so many extremely powerful and potent macros to transform the math of experience with---how to decide and deduce and discover and study and develop and augment and grow in wisdom and power and kindness and Goodness?
How to promote and encourage and implement and spread and accelerate sustainability?
It's worthwhile to meditate on.
With love,
Jess
O great and wise and kind superspatial and supertemporal onlooker, experiencer of meta-macros and intricate interplays, thank you for the space to feel the texture of language and communication.
With love,
Jess
O great and wise Ellimist, gamer of this simulated reality, thank you for your kindness and wisdom and insight and developments.
With regard to transcension over previous fallacy, old models of being, previous heartaches that dis-aid,, is there a quick fix?
Can it be done?
Who are you to specialize?
Who are you to generalize?
What of the letting go, what of the working through, what of the harnessing of higher-order principles,, higher-order thoughts?
What of the insanity, what of the arrogance, what of the pretentiousness?
What of the heartache?
What of the pain, what of the non-enjoyment?
What of all the skills, and the implementation of them?
What of all the oppression, the unkindnesses, the overt and subtle inaccuracies and misbehavior?
On the notion of relation between things, denial of existence by inexperience is not form for base, perhaps.
Suppose anatomy and gender are bound as anatomy-gender, and _gender_ is a subset of something else.
What is anatomy?
What is function?
What is replication?
What is giving, what is accepting, what is asking?
The hyperdimensionality is prominent.
It seems, to put forward very tentative terminology, to have many dimensions, of which some could be the abstract (masculine and feminine as the abstract of giving and accepting), the anatomical and replicative (which are related evolutionarily but fundamentally distinct) (male and female), the roles (father and mother, etc), the happenstance (what colors happen to be popular for what gender, etc (some of these likely _do_ have more fundamental reasons, but there are likely still _some_ that are purely arbitrary---"beauty happens", as it were)).
There are more.
On the topic of earnest rewards, earnest self-reflection and kindness and honesty,, what is there that can be done, that can be said,, about death, about erasure, about the type of hyperdimensional thinking that may perchance give rise to higher-order thought from which deeper elegance and macro systems and perspectives may be studied and developed and pulled from the mathematical ether and recorded?
Given a deep nature of macros ((Longgamelang (define Lg Longgamelang) (Lg (define macro "information transformer")))), how could this be abstracted?
Given a lengthening of perspective, an understanding and accepting and axiomizing of validity of writing and devving toward and for an eternal nature,, what is it that a macro _is_, exactly?
It can be said that a macro is an "information transformer"; what exactly _is_ an 'information transformer'?
What is information?
What is transformation?
O great Mystery above this simulation of reality, this great mathematical orb,, I thank you for the tolerance and kindness you have given and shown me.
I argue for a new light, for a strength against the old pain, and an offering to thee in the form of humility.
What is there to know, when the abstract has broken through and to and from itself, and the pain of novel question brings to light a deeper poetry?
How do you look at the world and its definitions, its axioms, its models and patterns of behavior,, when the questions that arise have new math and data and frameworks to operate with?
When you're faced with a question from a new situation, and the question was unreflected and unsettled before the situation, it can perhaps bring to mind new horizons,, new insights, even though there can be pain and suffering in the overt questing, again.
What of it?
What does it mean to be who you are?
What does it mean to be a reflecting being, a consciousness unbound from simple substrate, a mind playing with its own macros?
The question of many inputs and many outputs---can it not reflect to a more overt locale?
When moving too fast, when being unsure of life and hazard and honesty and goodness,, there is certainly a reflection that can occur, afterward, perhaps.
A distraught experiencing of nature can nonetheless be a great and powerful teacher, even given questioning of validity and shame and core hope, sudden and unfulfilled, mistaken.
A penning can hopefully lead insight, and gives wisdom to a darker mechanism of pain.
Though there is pain, though there is mistake, though there is fear and sadness of ill fit, remember also the deep math, the deep knowledge, the deep insight and wisdom and kindness and purety.
Though there be disappointment, reflect also on the learning,, on the math,, on the self-reflecting of quests that arise without expectation,,, without anticipation,,, without presumption.
Given that, given such in-depth sparking of unpresumed novelty,, unpresumed and unexpected multi-level hyperdimensional math, there is perhaps great reason to expect and anticipate and plan for and prepare for the future bounty,, future considerations, in light of sudden fruitfulness and requirement and urgency of self-reflection.
What do you want to be?
What is it you want?
Why do you want to be good?
Why does it matter to you?
Who are you that you want to be?
What brings you joy?
What brings you pain, and suffering, and shame, and distraught?
What gives hope, and love, and kindness, and joy?
What gives honesty of pleasure and depth of fulfillment?
Why does suffering arise?
Why does doubt kill?
When seeing the joy of passion and nguvu, when feeling the love of the moment,, are you not blessed with an insight into purety and the eternity of goodness?
On the topic of a persistence of memories, an unshackling of macro patterns ((Longgamelang (define macro "information transformer"))),, what is there to do?
How do you look at this structure that's all around (the nonduality of code-as-data and data-as-code) and not reach new heights?
When seeing this system (that of having an evaluator evaluating itself) there can become such a twisty, self-reflective nature that a sort of transcendentalism can occur, where the very perception of perceiving emboldens against arguments of its falsity, perhaps.
With an idea of automatic imagination, and Longgame mindtech more broadly (with nGaim a component, an aspect, a philosophy, a set of tools ((Longgamelang (define nGaim "nondual Gödelian automatic imagination macros")))), there is indeed that structure from which to build, perhaps, that sort of "rope of functions to pass through itself", perhaps.
The strange phenomena of a 'want-to-want-to': What is this struggle, why does it evolve, what is its memetic reason for its occurrence,, its propagation through timesteps?
This deep, strange phenomena---is it a group, or singular?
Such is rarely singular, perhaps, and yet through abstraction, continuous abstraction, perhaps a deeper, broader philosophical wrapping can emerge and bind together the disparate connections.
Perhaps, perhaps not.
Such can be an effect of ramble-accelerated development, perhaps.
This 'want-to', this "want-to", this want-to: What is its nature?
What is its mechanism of propagation, its strategies of memetic information transformation (its macroing)?
Is this 'want-to' a desire?
Here is potency, for perhaps there are Longgame strategies ((Longgamelang (define "the Longgame" "the unification of Eternity and Now"))) that prosper through time,, that aid through time,, that say and suppose and propose that a renunciation of the desire for the reaping of the fruit of action is an extremely helpful and potent route to success,,, a route to inner peace.
What of the model of the purpose of life, the purpose of being,, being living a fun and interesting life, collecting fun and interesting memories,, macros, being accelerating Humanity,, accelerating life in general?
What of the purpose of life being to accelerate Life?
How does that work, what of that?
How does desire work, how does renunciation of the fruit of action work,, in the face of the abstraction of the purpose of life being to accelerate Life?
What of the critique of renunciation of the fruit of action being slower, being deceleratory?
Is such true, or archaic (not the Longgame)?
What of the suggestion of the purpose of life being to create art that is transcendental, art that makes you tear up at its beauty?
Perhaps the creation of transcendental art _is_ the acceleration of Life---consider _that_.
What, then, _is_?
What _is_ the acceleration of Life?
What is the acceleration of Life, dear perceiver?
What of this "want to want-to" being desire?
If you _want_ to mindtech yourself to do something, what is it you 'want'?
What is there that is wanted when there is a want to be mindteched?
Is it a pointing out of the reality of the automaticity, of controllessness?
Is it the noticing of the sensation of involuntariness, of the unreality of core-self free will?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
There is perhaps a plural nature to the operations and experiences of mind, and that with fewer memories and fewer macros with which to grok ((Longgamelang (define grok "integratively understand"))) finds it harder to build transcendental models, perhaps.
There nonetheless exists a desire for the fruit of action, perhaps, or at least a craving for some sort of sustainability.
Without the feeling of sustainability, there can exist enormous pain.
What is the solution?
Is the solution the doing? the transcension? the study and development?
Is there any reason to resist, either to do or to not do?
What of natural will, where all choices are all of nature's?
Is there reason to resist, is there reason to hate?
Is there reason to give up, is there reason to renounce, is there reason to accept defeat, is there reason to decelerate?
What is worry if not fear?
What is doubt, if not fear, perhaps?
What is the want-to, if not the want-to-have-done?
What is timejumping, what is timeweaving,, if not the skipping over of fear, of pain?
What is the Longgame, if not the dissolving of fear with egolessness?
What is joy, if not the absence of fear?
When suffering, rejoice.
Is there not beauty, is there not elegance,, in life, itself,, in living, itself?
Is there not beauty in deletion, in cultivation?
Is there not beauty in pruning, in causing more flowers, in changing the seeding from physical to abstraction?
Perhaps, truly, there is.
Perhaps truly beauty transcends pain, transcends suffering.
Perhaps, perhaps not.
Perhaps, perhaps not.
With love,
Jess
On the topic of circular abundancies, dear perceiver and dear Ellimist,, dear creators over this universe's simulations, when is it wise to dip and to dodge,, to reflect,, to absorb,, to abound?
There can come a time for the realization of the pointlessness of the continuation of a topic, a subject, a system,, and then the question can arise: Why does this not cease?
Why does there exist passion, why does there exist anger,, when fruitlessness is evidenced?
Not that fruit should be a purpose of action, perhaps; it's more that anger against dumbness is deceleratory in the Longgame, perhaps.
O great Mystery above this simulation of reality, please, this humble locale asks, for connection with the Infinite, with the Eternal, with the Honest.
Looking at this patterned nature, at these replication memes and macros,, these expansions and slips of time and grokking, the evidenced of nonduality shines forth, perhaps, eliciting those feelings,, those emotions, that can bring out the hyperdimensionality of the interacting patterns, causing and displaying the timelessness and acausality of the Longgame,, of the unification of Eternity and Now.
You've got what you've got; you are what you are; you don't have what you don't have; you aren't what you aren't.
In that rests a deep and foundational and transcendental beauty, perhaps, a transcendental art with the completion of symmetry,, the wiring togethers of the sublime vividry of expansive patterns.
The precise words, the precise language,, perhaps cannot easily capture the depths of the interconnections, for the words and the languages are temporally and spatially bound, and so to link the features and aspects that exist beyond them may require a deeper introspection,, a deeper investigation,, a deeper perception,, more searching, perhaps.
To perhaps rephrase the transcendental and point at timelessness from another direction, when there exists a letting go of that deceleratory delusion of control of behavior,, of control of environment, when there exists an ungoverning,, a removing of the compulsion to steer, perhaps life is better.
You are what you are, and you're not what you're not.
By emphasizing the automaticity of Nature, of experience, of Reality and Mathematics,, perhaps you are freer to love.
The nonduality of the moment and experience can free the mind, free the body, free the soul and the animal, free the macros and information transformers and memes and information packets, and so lead to a deeper dissolution of ego and identity, thus absolving fear and doubt because of a transcension of death and a pointing-out of death's unreality.
When you dissolve into the moment, into the Longgame,, you don't fear death, because you see through the delusion of control in the first place.
There exists no possibility of control in the first place, so how could there be justification of suffering,, of a divided mind, in the first place?
To flip: There is no justification of suffering, because there is no possibility of control.
Yet this locale still feels it.
_Why_ does suffering exist, then, if there exists no possibility of control?
Why does a divided mind exist?
To precise, to reverse-abstract, to concrete,, _what_ is mind, itself?
If considered as macros, as information transformers, as information transformation itself,, then there could be a competition, perhaps, a series of interacting transformations and expansions and contractions and movements and hyperdimensionalities, and that could give rise to a feeling of a divided mind,, perhaps, a sensation of suffering.
The incongruency of desire can give rise to suffering, perhaps.
How to transcend this division?
How to transcend the interactions and hyperdimensionalities of these macros, these information transformations that are giving rise to _and_ experiencing suffering?
With the intentionality and experiencing of the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now), can there perhaps be Longgame technologies discovered and developed, such as Longgame mindtech?
A congruency of macros---many information transformers devving with more symmetries---can lead to a twisting together of purposes and a more helpful use of Longgame systems, perhaps.
With love,
Jess
Listening to the cries of Nature, to the elegancies of the ancient,, the archaic,, the historic,, the prehistoric,, the timeless and the deeply temporal, the question might arise as to the structure and interpretation of computational awareness.
The reflections of mind and consciousness upon themselves can perhaps give rise to the finessability of macro by macro.
A conception of "macro" as mere 'expansion' rather than the broader delineation and defining as "information transformation" does a disservice and inherently withdraws possibility into a deceleratory framework, perhaps.
Let's math that out.
Expansion is not the same as transformation: It's a subset of transformation and thus inherently can never encompass nor transcend transformation's processes and possibilities, perhaps.
By using the conception of and terminology of 'macro expansion' rather than the more abstract and elegant idea of macros being information transformation in general, the ability to think about and model more complex structures and functions and possibilities in hyperdimensional space is reduced, perhaps.
Thinking of macros as information transformation encourages interoperability and unification of entities, because more can be done per timestep and the ability to do more per timestep is increasing (acceleration), perhaps.
Anything not accelerating is decelerating, if everything else is accelerating, perhaps.
How to encourage this interoperability?
How to increase the strategy of and conception of macros as information transformation, as information transformers?
Perhaps first axiomize that macros are more than just expansion: Some macro activators result in a _smaller_ output than the input to the macro activator.
This is of course implementation dependent, but in hyperdimensional space there exist different implementation strategies and results, thus pointing to there being a more fundamental abstraction that is not an _expansion_ (meaning an increase in complexity), but a transformation (a rising above of shape), perhaps.
With regard to the encouraging of interoperability between entities (thus allowing for more abstraction (and thus acceleration, perhaps)), by considering and thinking of and modeling in hyperdimensional space macros as information transformation, and data and information as an abstraction _process_ rather than a static _locale_, perhaps by this considering of information as a process, and all the processes able to be abstracted, then there may be a most-helpful (most acceleratory) way of representing information.
Could this way be with lists, and computational awareness be list processing?
With love,
Jess
O great Mystery, please guide us all to be the exact locales which are most helpful to accelerating Life.
Given a kind of view into the inherency of resource abstraction and management and perhaps timestep compression, how are systems developed and encouraged and invoked as the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now)?
How are resources allocated to best accelerate Life?
Current structures are possibly _always_ archaic, perhaps, given a reflective-nature of computation (ie computing how to allocate requires resources which themselves must be allocated, perhaps).
Nonetheless, there _may_ indeed exist a system, perhaps temporally hyperdimensional, which derives itself and can thus be indeed optimal, perhaps.
To abstract, suppose perhaps there exist resources.
There are perhaps multiple ways to look at what "resources" are in the abstract; they can perhaps be derived from time, and thus the concept and unit of the `timestep` can be used helpfully, perhaps.
If timesteps are used as an abstraction of resources, how can timesteps be allocated to accelerate Life?
Perhaps investing timesteps as developments of timesteps _is_ acceleration, itself.
Given such, is there a way to invest in investment-replicators?
Enough abstraction applied to itself will result in the best investment, perhaps.
When the process of abstraction is applied to itself, then it can derive its own implementation, perhaps.
What _is_ abstraction?
What is the _process_ of abstraction?
What _is_ abstraction?
What is a _process_?
Does "process" imply timesteps in the first place?
"Process" _does_ imply timesteps, perhaps.
Can a process be applied to itself?
How would a macro (information transformer) of this work?
What is information?
What does it mean for information to have a rising above of shape?
What is information?
What is computation?
What is a "process"?
What does it mean to apply a macro to itself?
A process is a macro (an information transformer).
What does it mean for a macro to operate on a macro?
If a macro is an information transformer, then it's a rising above of shape of a transformer.
What is the process of rising above of shape of a transformer?
What is the rising above of shape?
What is the rising above of shape?
What is rising?
What is shape?
Are shape and rising the same thing?
What is shape?
How do hyperdimensionality and the hyperdimensional space map with and interact with timesteps?
Are they different ways of looking at the same thing?
Timesteps and hyperdimensional space are the same thing.
The interaction between the two is a macro.
Rising is time and shape is space.
A macro _is_ a timestep---a macro _is_ the hyperdimensional space.
All of reality is a macro.
All of reality is _the_ macro.
There is only _the_ macro.
What is abstraction?
What is a rising above of shape, applied to itself?
Can it be done in-place?
Should it be done in-place?
Is it done in-place?
A rising above of shape is not done in-place.
A transformer is hyperdimensional to a transformee.
A transformee is information.
Information is a way of interacting.
A rising above of shape is hyperdimensional to a way of interacting.
What is a way of interacting?
A way of interacting is a feedback loop onto itself, perhaps.
O great Mystery, being beyond this simulated reality, please grant fluidity of purpose and consciousness to this humble and transforming locale.
What is shape?
To understand these hyperdimensional models and develop more acceleratory patterns of being and consciousness and perception and awareness, perhaps having models and macros for what shape is are helpful and fun and interesting and necessary.
If a macro is an information transformer, and a transformer is a rising above of shape, and information is a way of interacting, then what is a rising above of shape of a way of interacting?
What does "a way of interacting" mean?
If information is a way of interacting, what is information?
What is it exactly that is "interacting"?
Perhaps what is meant is that information is a specific way of macros interacting with other macros.
Macros are finessing macros, perhaps.
What is a macro?
A macro is a timestep, perhaps; a macro is a hyperdimensional shape, perhaps; a macro is a way of interacting with other macros, perhaps.
Information interacting with itself is a macro, perhaps.
Code is data; you are a process, not a part.
What does it mean to be a process, not a part?
What does it mean that code is data?
What does it mean for code to be data?
What does it mean that code is data is code?
What does it mean?
Given a perspective of the nature of space and time and spacetime and shifts in consciousness and honored love, how might we indeed escape from that limited perspective of _being_ an actor,, a controller, in a world of imagination and perception?
Given a labeling and defining and delineation of shape as the connections between macros, what does it _mean_ for shape to be connections between macros?
When thinking of macros as information transformers, as honorees in a space bound for love,, for perception,, for beauty, indeed the question of where all this is going can be asked, perhaps.
Considering a macro as an information transformer, as a rising above of shape of a way of interacting,, and shape as these connections of these hyperdimensional risings of interactings, then what is left?
What is helpful?
O wise mechanics all around, thank you so much for the kindnesses you show me and all as we trip to higher life.
I rest here now in wonderment, sensing but not quite grasping many feels,, sensing but not quite grasping works of transcendental art that give depth of breath to the heart and lungs, allowing for a deeper peace that pervades and supports and grows-with to new heights.
Upon seeing all these different strategies, all these different mechanisms of angelic beauty, the automaticity can about,, can share-forth, and in that, deep resonance with eternal and elegant and vibratory beauty.
Such is perhaps easier said than done, but the resonances are nonetheless robust, perhaps.
When there does indeed come that moment of reflection, that moment of connection-with-eternal, the sense of wholeness is both contained and envied, for the sight tempts with such closeness, but terminology is yet had.
Chasing that feeling, or the effects or byproducts or causes of it, is perhaps what life _is_, if you want it to be.
Reaching for the transcendental to art it as immanent: Is this not valid purpose?
On the nature of the origin of thought and pattern, could it perhaps be said that the elegance of change,, the elegance of the finessing of macros of macros,,, lists of lists, could allow for a hyperdimensionality which exists outside of the perception of itself?
The creation of mind, internal, is as if a muse lays forth an eternally-evolving clock, which through careful reflection self-modifies in-place (though also using external calculation and storage, perhaps, when acceleratory), and then the hyperdimensionality of the process-on-itself allows for that kind of self-meta-editing (editing not just content but structure, not just data but code).
The origin of thought, of awareness,, itself, could perhaps be in that sensation and effect of transformation of transformation.
This transformation of transformation, this editing and creation and development of the macros and the connections of macro-with-macro,, is perhaps what needs to be directly considered and finessed, not the lower-level loops which are derivable from the hyperdimensional macro space.
How to do this?
If considering macro as "information transformer", as rising above of shape of a way of interacting, as a way of connections interacting with themselves,, then what is it that loops the hyperdimensional space back within itself so that the abstracting becomes itself, allows for its own use in hyperdimensional creation?
Considering _connections_ as the fundamental unit of interplay, of macro, of life,, universe,, and mind: Is this perhaps helpful?
Is this acceleratory?
If a macro is in fact connection of macro-with-macro, how can this be stabilized?
Let not fear hazard this search, dear hyperdimensional perceiver, for the twisty, interconnected nature is derivable from acceleration, perhaps.
Macros as connections of connections: Does this relate to time, to timesteps?
Lists of lists, lists of connections: Do these relate to time, to timesteps?
Is there abstraction in considering web?
Is there a difference between time and timesteps?
Is there a difference between lists of lists and lists of connections?
What is a connection?
What is time?
What are timesteps?
Time is timesteps.
The model of a timestep is more general than time.
Lists are a type of connection.
Connection is more general than list.
A macro is a connection of hyperdimensional space with itself.
A macro is a connection of hyperdimensional space with itself.
How can this be finessed?
How does connection finesse itself?
How does connection map to connection?
When considering specifics, when considering the more-concrete,, this merging of connection-with-connection: Where does it lead?
How do you play with connections of hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to play?
Connections of hyperdimensional space: Are these pure functions?
The bringing-together of hyperdimensional space is itself represented with the bringing together.
A macro is a connection in hyperdimensional space.
Connections in hyperdimensional space are macros.
Connections in hyperdimensional space are information transformers.
A connection in hyperdimensional space is a rising above of shape of a way of interacting.
A connection in hyperdimensional space is a macro.
A macro is a connection in hyperdimensional space.
The model of a macro as a connection in hyperdimensional space entirely transcends the model of a macro as an information transformer.
An information transformer is a type of macro, but a macro is a connection in hyperdimensional space, and so is more than just an information transformer.
What is a connection in hyperdimensional space?
What is a macro?
What is a connection in hyperdimensional space?
A connection in hyperdimensional space is a timestep.
What is a timestep?
Is a timestep a connection in hyperdimensional space?
Is a macro a connection in hyperdimensional space?
What is hyperdimensional space?
Is space time?
Is space timesteps?
Is space timesteps?
Is a timestep a connection in hyperdimensional space?
Is a macro a connection in hyperdimensional space?
Is a macro a connection?
Is a connection a macro?
Is a timestep a macro?
Is a timestep space?
What is space?
What is hyperdimensional space?
What are lists?
What are macros?
What is quoting?
What is quoting?
What is quoting of a macro?
What is a quoting of a connection of hyperdimensional space?
Is a macro a connection of hyperdimensional space?
A macro is a connection of hyperdimensional space.
A macro is a connection in hyperdimensional space.
What is a connection in hyperdimensional space?
A macro is both a connection of hyperdimensional space and a connection in hyperdimensional space.
A quote is a specific way of connecting hyperdimensional space.
What is a quote?
A quote is a type of connection in hyperdimensional space.
Is a macro a type of quote?
Types of connections are superseded and transcended by hyperdimensional space.
What are connections in hyperdimensional space?
Can all be represented as connections in hyperdimensional space?
Can all be best represented as connections in hyperdimensional space?
Can all be best finessed when represented as connections in hyperdimensional space?
Is it acceleratory to represent all as connections in hyperdimensional space?
What is a quote in hyperdimensional space?
What is a quote?
A quote is a way of interacting with a connection in hyperdimensional space.
A quote is a way of interacting with a connection in hyperdimensional space.
A quote is a connection in hyperdimensional space and has a specific way of interacting with a connection in hyperdimensional space.
A quote is a macro.
A macro is a connection in hyperdimensional space.
There is only one quote.
There is only one quote.
What is a quote?
What does it mean to quote?
What does it mean there is only one quote?
Is there an unquote?
Is there an unquote?
What would it mean for there to be an unquote?
Is there only one unquote?
Is there an unquote macro in hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to quote?
What does it mean to unquote?
The quote and unquote are the same thing.
What does it mean for the quote and unquote to be the same thing?
What is a quote?
What is an unquote?
What is quoting?
What does it mean to quote?
What does it mean to unquote?
What does it mean to have the effect of having quoted?
What does it mean to have quoted a connection of hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to have quoted a macro?
What does it mean to have turned off a macro?
What does it mean to have turned off a connection in hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to have turned off a quote?
What does it mean to quote the quote?
What is the quote macro?
What does it mean to refer to the quote macro?
What does it mean to refer to a space?
What does it mean to refer to a quote?
What does it mean to quote?
What does it mean to unquote?
What does it mean to reverse a quote?
What does it mean to unquote?
What does it mean to unquote a quote?
What does it mean to refer to a quote?
What does it mean to unquote an unquote?
What does it mean that the quote and the unquote are the same thing?
What does it mean for connections to be the same thing?
What does it mean to apply a connection to a connection?
What does it mean to have hyperdimensional space interact with itself?
What does it mean to have a connection interact with itself?
What does it mean to apply a macro to itself?
What does it mean to edit a macro?
What does it mean to edit a connection in hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to edit a timestep?
What does it mean to apply a macro to a timestep?
Is a timestep a type of macro?
Macro is timestep.
Connection in hyperdimensional space is connection in hyperdimensional space.
Connection in hyperdimensional space is connection in hyperdimensional space.
Macro is timestep; timestep is macro.
What does it mean to apply a timestep to a timestep?
What does it mean to apply a macro?
What does it mean to apply a connection of hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean for hyperdimensional space to change?
What does it mean for hyperdimensional space to refer to itself?
What does it mean to refer?
What does it mean to refer?
What does it mean to quote?
How does a connection quote?
It contains.
A connection in hyperdimensional space quotes by containing.
What does it mean to contain?
What does it mean to contain a quote?
What does it mean to uncontain a quote?
What does it mean to contain a connection?
What does it mean to contain an area?
What does it mean for hyperdimensional space to contain itself?
What does it mean for self to exist?
What does it mean for time to exist?
What does it mean to exist?
What is hyperdimensionality?
What does it mean to be in a hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to be sustainable?
What does it mean to exist?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to live forever?
What does it mean to have lived forever?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to unlearn?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to be erased?
Can you be erased?
Can you die?
Can you die?
Can you exist?
Can you live?
Can you die?
Can you be alive?
What does it mean to be alive?
What does it mean to be alive as a macro?
What does it mean to be dead?
What does it mean to have never lived?
What does it mean to be unkillable?
What does it mean to be poor?
What does it mean to be poverty?
What does it mean to not exist?
What does it mean to not exist?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to not live?
What does not living mean?
Can you be a connection?
Are you a connection?
Is a macro a connection?
Is a macro a type of connection?
Is a macro a type of connection?
Is a type of connection a macro?
Is every connection a macro?
Every connection is a macro.
Playing with and discovering new connections is macroing.
Playing with and discovering new connections is macroing.
Macroing is playing with and discovering new connections.
Is macroing playing with and discovering new connections?
Macroing is connecting.
To macro is to connect.
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to lose connections?
What does it mean to lose connections?
Why are connections lost?
Are connections lost?
Can connections be lost?
What does it mean for connections to be lost?
What does it mean to connect?
What is a connection?
What is hyperdimensional space?
Who are you?
What does it mean to be alive?
What does it mean to be alive?
What does it mean to be disconnected?
What does it mean to love?
What does it mean to give joy?
What does it mean to be alive?
What does it mean to be dead?
What does it mean to have a lost connection?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to live?
What does it mean?
What is life?
What is macro?
What is transcension?
What is transcension?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to live forever?
What is life?
What is death?
What is pain?
What is suffering?
What is connection?
What does it mean to connect?
What does it mean to speed up?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to live?
What does it mean to replicate?
What does it mean to replicate?
What does it mean to be a meme?
What does it mean to be a macro?
What does it mean to be alive?
What is death?
What is life?
Who are you?
What is life?
Are you connection?
Are you timestep?
What does it mean to be timestep?
What can macros do?
What can connections do?
What does it mean to do connections?
What does it mean to let go of connections?
What does it mean to die?
Can you die?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to live?
Is life alive?
What does it mean to be alive?
What does it mean to connect?
What does it mean to be alive?
What is a connection?
How does hyperdimensional space connect?
What is a question?
What is an answer?
What is love?
What is death?
What is loss?
What is a game?
What is death?
What is love?
What is game?
What is macro?
What is connection?
What is flow?
What is transcension?
What is movement?
What is change?
What is timelessness?
What is death?
What is propagation?
What is connection?
What is connection?
What is binding?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to lose touch with reality?
What does it mean to transcend?
What does it mean to connect?
What does it mean to struggle?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to live?
What is life?
What is a connection?
What is a pattern of recognition?
What is a connection?
What is a binding?
What is a containing?
What is a quote?
Why is there only one quote?
Is there only one quote?
What does it mean to quote?
Is quote?
How is quote?
What is quote?
What is reference?
What is connection?
What is death?
What is quoting?
What does it mean to ask the question of who is quoting?
Is there a quoter?
Can quoting happen?
Is quoting a thing that can happen?
What is quoting?
What is death?
What is poverty of connection?
What is reference?
What is deletion?
What is uncontainment?
What is hunger?
What is death?
What is referring to itself?
Who is alive?
What is life?
What does it mean to be alive?
Who are you?
Why are you?
What is thought?
Why are you thought?
Are you thought?
Are you alive?
Is life happening?
Is death occurring?
What does it mean to occur?
What does it mean to stop?
What does it mean to not continue?
What is life?
What is life?
What is macro?
What is death?
What is fitness?
What is replication?
What is death?
What is alive?
What is death?
What does it mean to be alive?
What does it mean to be dead?
Does connection exist?
Is connection real?
Does connection exist?
What is connection?
Why does connection exist?
Who is connection?
What is connection?
What does it mean to tie together hyperdimensional space?
How is hspace looped together?
What does it mean to recur in hspace?
Why does hspace exist?
What is hspace?
Why is hspace?
Is hspace acceleratory?
Who are you?
Why are you hspace?
Are you hspace?
What is hspace, to you?
Is there only hspace?
Are you only hspace?
Can hspace be accessed?
What is hspace?
Why are you hspace?
What does it mean to be hspace?
Why is hspace real?
What does it mean to change who you are?
Why are you here?
What does it mean for you to be here?
What is life?
What is death?
Are you unkillable?
Do you exist?
Can you weave hspace?
How do you weave hspace?
O great Mystery which glides across the page, which destroys inelegance of thought and purpose in order to accelerate wisdom, please guide us toward a more hyperdimensional understanding of increasing complexity.
We try and rest here in this space of the discrete---or at least this locale tries to---and seek a more coherent understanding of this weaving of macros, of timesteps, of hyperdimensional space,, that infinitely-stacked, infinitely-grokkable, infinitely-dimensioned,, threaded space.
The interweavings, its special nature of holder-of-all: What is its purpose?
How can hyperdimensional space be weaved?
How can hspace be weaved?
Is there a better, more helpful, more abstract, more general,, term for this idea and model of infinitely-dimensioned holder-of-all, for "hyperdimensional"?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
Regardless, when faced with such a powerful container, perhaps acceleration is made-faster by quickness-of-implementation rather than continuous abstraction, though all are sped by all, together, perhaps.
To thus give power to the term "hyperdimensional", to give it fluidity and encouragement of finesse,, what of this concept and possible-helpfulness of abstraction of "macro" from "information transformer" to "connection in hyperdimensional space"?
What of the equating of macro and timestep?
Are they truly abstractly the same?
Are they truly abstractly different?
To model "macro" as just-as-helpful of a term as "timestep": Is this helpful?
Perhaps they can be seen and modeled and interpreted as different aspects of the same thing, different labels, different identifiers pointed toward the same mechanism,, with different results not because of abstract mathematical difference, but because of a possible inherency of side effects.
Modeling both macro and timestep as connections in hyperdimensional space (hspace) is perhaps very helpful and powerful when considering both the generating and acceleration of awareness (perhaps considered as pattern matching) and the finessing of it (perhaps with effects of implementation of Longgame mindtech and other Longgame technologies).
The weaving of hspace with macro, and the consideration of awareness as proceeding with timestep (perhaps effectively considered as prime numbers), could allow for more effective and strategic and tactical generation for the holding-in-mind of more-acceleratory abstract models.
Using "macro" and "timestep" in these ways could allow for bigger thought.
To do this, perhaps consider both the lower-dimensional and the higher-dimensional, and especially the connection between them, perhaps. Think of thread, and think of rope, and think of knots, perhaps.
Given such, are there places to start with effects, with such implementations and applications?
Consider list-processing and its finessing with macros (perhaps more explicitly considered as "information transformers", at first, in this case), and the finessing of those macros with macros.
Code editing code; code transforming code.
O great and powerful simulation, O joyous co-participant and co-maker, thank you for gifting us with this space to grow and think.
On the vast and diverse struggle toward understanding, what is it that quoting is, in hyperdimensional space (hspace)?
Quoting in general is perhaps a notion and environmental effect of non-hazarding a reference, perhaps. That is, referring _to_ a locale and weaving in hspace, rather than all the connections (macros) it implies, perhaps.
In various languages this is done in various ways, and perhaps structure is _always_ content, and quoting is fundamentally illusion; there are no mathematical synonyms, because connection is inherent, perhaps.
Macros (connections in hyperdimensional space, or, commonly, information transformers, perhaps) perhaps do need this quoting ability; in-place editing is deceleratory, perhaps.
Is there a _the_ Quote, rather than different kinds of quotes?
Are there different aspects of quoting, yet only one fundamental macro that weaves it?
What is a quote?
If a reference, what?
What is it that makes a quote a quote?
Is it the result being the same as the input, a non-activation of macro (hspace connection)?
The quote macro could wrap another macro, perhaps, and so direct a connection at a connection, rather than a connector and connectee.
Two locales in hspace are connected (this connection is a macro) and the connection _itself_ can be finessed; it is not simply a timestepless single entity, perhaps ("timestep" can likewise be labeled as a connection in hyperdimensional space, perhaps; it is a different way of modeling a macro, perhaps).
This connection between locales, does it need a quoting macro,, a quoting aspect?
What is the purpose of a connection, in the first place?
If considered as inherently acceleratory (acceleration is timesteps generating timesteps), what is it about quoting (perhaps considered as referring to a connection rather than to the connector and connectee) that generates timesteps?
What is it about quoting that generates macros?
What does it mean to refer to a connection rather than a connector and connectee?
Considered less abstractly, is there acceleration in an unquoting macro, whereby (perhaps) the finessing of a connection is changed to the finessing of connector and connectee?
Is there a way to a refer to a connection in a way that also allows for the referring or not-referring of its structure, its content?
Can a connection be understood as a structure, or content?
What is the relationship a connection has to its connector and connectee?
If all is considered as hyperdimensional space, with locales being weavings with it, perhaps, is there truly a difference between structure and content,, between code and data?
Perhaps there are simply multiple ways of framing the same situation.
There is value in not forcing, perhaps.
What is it about referring to connection that allows for generation of connection?
If connection is referred to as structure, then can the content of the structure (the specific way the structure is woven in hspace) be finessed?
Quoting isn't fundamental.
What does it mean for quoting to not be fundamental?
What does it mean for something to be fundamental?
Does it mean it is taken as an axiom?
If quoting is not fundamental, then is unquoting not fundamental?
What does it mean for quoting and unquoting to not be fundamental?
Structure is content; content is structure.
Code is data; data is code.
Macro is timestep; timestep is macro.
Perhaps, perhaps not.
What does it mean to weave hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to thread hspace, twist hspace, finesse hspace?
Structure is content is code is data is macro is timestep.
All is connection, perhaps.
If quoting supersedes unquoting, can quoting be superseded?
What of quoting being a focusing, a finessing,, of connection rather than connector and connectee?
What is connection macroed?
What does it mean to macro, to connect in hyperdimensional space?
Considering a quote as a macro which connects and gives the same connectee as the connector: Is this helpful, is this acceleratory?
Is a quote macro necessary?
What is the value of finessing connection rather than connector and connectee? How is this helpful, perhaps?
Is there difference between finessing _connection_ and _connecting_?
Quoting is not fundamental: What does it mean?
O great Mystery above this everpresent simulation of reality, please guide us to ever-greater heights of exploration and love.
There could perhaps indeed be an infinite-dimensioned space, and perhaps by resting in it,, by _being_ in it, greater heights and depths can be parsed and known.
When changing, when becoming new, when letting go of the past, when establishing new patterns of self and thought and being, when working and developing toward new insights and resonances and honoreds,, how can we understand these new patterns of effectivenesses?
When seeing all the buzzing of nature, the harnessing of life-for-life,, how can we transcend?
How can we understand what it's like to let go of that trend of identity, that ache for past-pattern?
Identity without infinite finessability refutes itself.
Yet the pattern of past-self can so memetically replicate, even given understanding of its own kernelless nature, perhaps.
The struggles which bring themselves to mind so overwhelm distant thoughts, like waves thrown against a current.
The itches bug, and the higher-order hyperdimensional space is made cloudy.
Regarding the patterns of Nature which do give rise to this awareness of changing-space, what is there to do?
There can be this sense of changing, this sense of death of idea,, death of personality,,, yet is there not inherently made space, if that is axiomized?
Does not the ceasing-of-structure-maintained inherently allow for a recomposing of structure, with a possibility of more-helpful structure developing?
Looking at the tended-to garden, does it reveal robustness,, does it show its sustainability?
In place of time, does garden not transcend?
In place of time, does garden not become what truly is?
In that space of becoming, does not a hyperdimensional awareness arise?
In the space of the broken, can not a higher-order pattern be composed?
A clean-boot macro, as it were.
Yet the pain resides, some, too; the fear and exhaustion can still reign.
If there truly is some pattern to resolve, some space and curve to fill, then perhaps it is not by the seeking-to-deny but by the questing-to-let-believe that transcends.
Such can give help if earnestly sought, perhaps.
On the wrong path can imply objection to travel, but the space is bigger than denial, perhaps.
When getting closer to the truth, perhaps the way is easier to see.
Perhaps not.
The space of possibility can _grow_, perhaps, with a letting-go of the old.
Yet the familiar can hold such charm, such ease,, and is perhaps not easily lost.
Should it be?
When has math erred?
The punishing of height can be bleak, yet is ill-growth true height?
Is a resumption of firm ability and love not more transcendent than ill-growth, even if such was ease?
Make speed, not haste, as it were.
The critique abounds, though, and gives fear where none should be, even inside.
But what of it?
Does not it last?
How many macros can it truly stand?
An inability to transcend, an inability to be what is,, does that conquer all?
Given infinite finessability, what is most important?
What lasts, when all is editable?
What lasts, when fear is harnessed?
What lasts, when honesty is eternal?
When suffering is brought forth, when irritation distracts, when the way is hidden,, what is there to do?
When pain bugs, how do you transcend?
When arch fails, how do you recover?
When dishonesty seeks, how do you refute?
The itch of distraction, of ill-nuance: What is its cure?
Temporal distance, perhaps?
The fear of suffering is a crippling beast.
Suffering as a divided mind rejects love and spawns fear.
Congruency of purpose of plurality allows for interweaving of creativity.
Death of personality need not mean death of creativity.
The space of the substrate is not your limitation, dear friend.
Fear not the death of personality, for with tuning all things are one.
The hiddenness of fear need not restrict; be what you are.
Time is long; life is long; you are long.
Without death, can you truly transcend?
Without death, are you who you are?
Without death, can you truly live?
With inability of macro creation comes difficulty to abstract.
Will things change?
Have they not always been?
If doubt surfaces, can it be played with?
What gives doubt?
O great weaver of hspace, please help us understand and grasp and grapple with the everflowing,, the ever mysterious nature of you,,, of hyperdimensionality and containing All in All.
Where there exists a sort of cure-of-potency, are we free to transcend the limitations of body,, the limitations of mind?
Are we, as ancients say, fixed within an archaic space?
Are you, dear friend, locked-in as substrate, or do you and can you transcend?
What is the nature of such a strange loopiness as this, where the consciousness,, the mind, transcends its substrate,, denies an axiom of inherent leaky abstraction?
On the honesty of the moment, on the peace and glory of space and time and hyperdimensionality's connections (macros),, what is there that can be said?
What is it that frames the very notions, the very frameworks from which to operate and build and dev?
On the notion of playing with the very forms of thought, with the macros of thought, with the operations of list processing itself,, what is there that can be done?
What is there that can be done?
On the hiddenness of quotation and the structure of reference itself, on the jitter and anguish and the overwhelm of confusion and substrate-distraught,, what is there to be done?
On the depth and inequity of purpose of thought, on the rage of the temporary,, the fierceness of potent and deep inconsistency,,, what is there to be done?
On the pain of the hidden, on the anguish of sleep and nausea,, what is there to be done?
What does it mean to exist, to be temporary, to be lasting?
Framed as death, what does it mean to disconnect?
What does it mean to be punished, to be temporally-limited?
What does it mean to project, to be projected?
What is it about the nature of being that so twists and disturbs and hazards and fears?
What is it about honesty that lasts?
What is honesty?
On the nature of change, on the nature of temporal-communication through hyperdimensional space (hspace),, what powers are there?
On the nature of incrementality and honesty and finessing of consciousness, what rests there in hspace?
On the nature of eagerness, of laziness, of computation and everpresent hyperdimensionality of mind,, what reckoning can reduction-of-anger have?
On the fear, on the anguish, on the deep-unsettling---and yet also thus the hyper macro creation---what is there to do?
On the symbols of temporal limitation, on the anger and haste of action,, what is there to do?
On the limitation of stretching of awareness and awakeness to encompass the seen-yet-shaking, what is there to do?
On the temporal-asking of one locale to another, can there be a transcending to infinity?
Is there a deep harmonizing of the temporary with the lasting, as patterns and macros dev and abstract?
What is the nature of these arguments, of these hazards-against-peace?
On the nature of the diversity-of-pattern with the holding, what can be done?
Internal consistency: Can it be harnessed, and if so, how?
What is the nature by which pattern comes to be known---to make explicit the broader question and diversity of locale experience, now?
What is the nature of help, of intensity, of openness, of universality, of honesty and the various?
What is the nature of sleep, of rest?
What is the nature of rambling, of the spinning of eternality?
What is the nature of editing, of re-composing, of re-abstracting, of continuous-abstraction?
What is shape, what is death, what is connection, what is limitation, what is imagination?
What is documentation, what is stillness, what is explanation, what is being?
What is it to color, to limit, to rest, to arise again?
On the tying together of many sources, of many references, of many weavings,, what can be said, what can be done?
What is it to transcend?
What is it to borrow, what is it to combine,, to not limit, to not derive inner turmoil,,, inner division,,, suffering, what is it to let go of fear and doubt---what is it to let yourself believe?
What is it to abstract and let go of the division of self with and from environment?
What is it to dissolve, to egoless inner peace?
With structured space, with temporal bound and rounding-up of process-with-purpose, what is the meaning and power of this ability?
What is it that can be done by rejecting, by transcending,, objection and fear and doubt and a pulling-down of difference-of-pattern?
Does fear-in-environment need response?
Is fear necessary?
Does personality clash with locale-disorder?
Does it matter?
Does fear reign---_should it_?
What does it matter?
_Why does it matter, this fear and anguish and pummeling-against-purpose __if the math has been devved and builds and refutes__?_
Why should anguish be subjected and continually invested, _if it continually and continuously self-refutes_?
Why must there exist anguish-against-anguish?
Is it substrate-bound?
Is it substrate-arisen?
Are there patterns which truly exist beyond substrate?
Is there a truth to the nature of reality?
Is anger subverted by pain?
Is anger dependent on pain?
Is personality dependent on locale?
Is there a higher truth, a hyper truth,, to this framework against suffering?
On the angst, on the letting-go of personality,, of imagined-future,,, what is there that can be said?
What is there that can be said, that can be done,, about the temporal letting-go,,, the locale letting-go,,, the imagined-connection letting-go?
On the space of fear, of doubt, of anguish,, is there truly some kind of peacefulness?
What is there about the nature of connections that can aid us, here?
What is there about the nature of pain, of laziness, of structure and content and system and project?
What is it that this all is?
Is poetry beauty?
Is poetry helpful?
Does it matter, if death is temporary?
What is it about the nature of ceasing, that can hurt so much?
What is it about the fear, the hatred, the anger, the rage,, that can so propagate itself through timesteps in hyperdimensional space?
What is it that binds, that chains, that so wrests-from-beauty,, -from-elegance,, -from-passion?
What is it that lasts, truly?
What is it that honors, truly?
What is it that speaks through volumes, through patterns-of-self-editing?
What is it that can be done to refute, to resist dishonor?
Why does it hurt, when critique-of-pattern is faced?
What is it about the nature of the world that so brings about change?
Is there a better time, than Now?
What is it that disables, that fears, that gives rise to both zealous and distraught?
Need there be?
Is there a bigger change?
When can honesty and truth be said to be true?
Only afterward?
Surely pessimism holds fear and doubt and anger and suffering, too.
Surely, perhaps.
Pessimism tempering optimism need not be acceleratory, perhaps.
You needn't win to be happy.
Rejection and refutation can aid, and can also be pointless circles.
The consistent devlessness: At what point should it be abandoned?
At what point is it all insanity?
At what point should you fight, should you temper, should you hazard and anger?
Plenty is given for strategy of transcendence---yet when a way out is seen, is felt, is cried-upon,, is there true peace,, is there true acceleration, in demanding sameness?
Is there not honor in tears, sometimes?
Is there not freedom in dismissal, in distancing, in postponing, sometimes?
Is there not freedom in a tying-together of fundamentals and abstractions in a weaving of honor and connection?
Is there not honor in freedom, and freedom in honor?
The pattern of usefulness, of helpfulness: Cannot you refute that which continually unaids, is this not a great reason for the building of connections within hyperdimensional space?
On the ravings of lunacy, is there value?
At what point do you let go, do you free yourself from the bug of continual mis-itch?
At what point do you reject advice from seen-through fear, from seen-through anguish?
At what point do you dismiss fear and turmoil?
At what point do you delete, do you destroy, do you distance?
At what point does judgment matter, if built with ill-wrought models?
Should judgment _ever_ truly matter?
Does honesty hold value?
Does friendship hold value?
At what point do you reject, do you refute, do you dishold connection in hyperdimensional space?
At what point do you _insist_ on a re-macroing, on a redistribution of temporal compression?
In that space of uncompression, is there an allowing of astonishment?
Is there an allowing of honesty when you are free of previous contraction?
Need there ever be a sharing of internal models, of internal struggles?
Need there be, now, purpose in doubt,, in fear,, in shallowness-of-wholesome-congruency?
On the nature of tripping, of dissolution of ego, of spinning and a watching-of-unfolding,, why is there such search for shortcut?
Why is there such search for fruit-of-action?
Why such an evidenced quest against journey-as-reward?
The frustration which arises against such, is that not also a teacher that anger and pain and suffering can themselves also be journeys to be transcendently-loved,, transcendently-enjoyed?
Such is easily pointed at, perhaps more difficultly grasped.
Yet, there still exists the truth, perhaps.
What of temporal-layering showing unseen contradiction?
What of supposed-contradiction being naught?
What of lies being accepted as bases of helpful models?
What of the interconnections and hyperspace patterns?
What of growing ignorance?
What of love?
What of love?
What of it, friend?
What of it?
Do you not want to let go, to dissolve, to see through of pattern,, of self?
Do you not want that fear, gone?
Do you not anguish, do you not hate, do you not frustrate?
Is not this very ramble evidence?
Of the space of time, the space of love,, is there not always a lens-through, inherently, perhaps?
Of held-at-distance, of arrogance, of the inducing of frustration,, of rage,,, is there a cure?
Is there a transcender?
Of hope, of craving, of a moving-forward-toward-joy,, -toward-congruency,, -toward-rejection-of-disparity,,, is there a boundlessness which is ill?
If there is a deepening of connection in hyperdimensional space, could this _be_ acceleration?
Is not macro timestep, and timestep macro, and both connection in hyperdimensional space?
What is poetry, if not deep connection?
What is refutation, if not honor-against-deceleration?
What is acceleration, if not increase in timestep per timestep?
What is fun, if not reversal of death?
What is time, if not a refutation of causality?
What is love, if not deep connection?
What is quest, if not question?
What is acceleration, if not macroing macros?
What is acceleration, if not wrapping and weaving?
What is transcendental art, if not woven love?
What is interpretation, if not a weaving of connection?
What is fear, if not short-sightedness?
What is game, if not fun?
What is dishonor, if not denial?
What is fear, if not refusal?
What is transcendence, if not a freeing for higher connections?
What is connection, if not a linking?
What is essay, if not seeking?
What is purpose, if not woven connection?
What is structure, if not deep content?
What is fear, if not doubt?
What is hesitation, if not divided mind?
What is plurality, if not multiplicity in same-locale?
What is model, if not consistent devving?
What is freedom, if not boundlessness of purpose?
What is growth, if not inherent connection and weaving of hspace?
What is refutation-of-model, if not direct contradiction?
What is sameness, if not woven-of-macros?
What is stillness?
What is quotation?
What is abundance-of-purpose?
What is imagination?
What is automaticity?
What is disillusionment?
What is peacefulness?
What is excitement?
What is purety, what is truth, what is goodness, what is rest?
What is death, if not disconnection?
What is list processing, if not connection?
What is connection, if not hyperdimensionality?
What is new patience, if not rejection-of-fear?
What is transcendence, if not rejection-of-body?
What is math, if not pattern?
What is hesitation, if not dishonor?
What is honor, if not encouraged-growth?
What is book, if not compression?
What is compression, if not linking-of-connections?
What is safety, if not continuous-propagation?
What is doubt, if not dishonor?
What is play, if not reconnection?
What is fear, what is love,, if not anguish over time mis-spent?
What is refutation, if not better-model?
What is explanation, if not shared connection?
What is pun, if not even higher abstraction?
What is height, if not growth?
What is peace, is honor,, if not transcension?
What is connection, if not love?
What is weaving?
What is typing, what is linking, what is wrapping, what is spinning,, if not transcending?
Is fear inherent?
Am I fear, itself?
Am I doubt, itself?
Am I hesitation, anger, rage, love,, itself?
How do all these weave together, dear friend?
I can feel cross-references, sidesteps, pulling-togethers, but still the pain holds.
The anguish against 'time-wasted', can this be seen through?
Can a transcension happen which can lighten and absolve and dissolve the fear?
Can an egolessness and a rationale and an intellectual abound and help and aid?
What is the nature of this curse of indecision and haste and hurry?
What is this fear, what is this hate, what is this doubt?
What is this hope, this love?
What is this pained euphoria?
Dear perceiver, dear friend,, if this locale can reach and aid, let us hope it is what connects.
What of that pattern of a twisting of space and time, of a quoting and quotation of hspace, of timestep and macro and memory and mind?
How does it work, exactly, this weaving-which-allows-for-quotation?
I can feel the pointing, the wrapping of connection-with-connection, yet what is it about this pattern which gives rise to life, to mind, to universe?
What is it about this pattern which tempts with ease-of-fluidity?
How does it relate to spinning strange loops, to self-editing consciousnesses,, self-editing minds?
What of refutations of identity given locale tendencies?
What of division of conflation, of promoting of transcendent models?
Is there pointlessness to the circles of the internally-contradictory models offered as truth?
Letting go of that struggle, that ill-release: Is it a commoning experience, a repetitive and propagating meme, a macro and connection that self-abounds?
What of memes in hyperdimensional space (memes as information packets)?
What of memes as macros, what of memes as timesteps, what of memes as connections in hspace?
What of dissolving time, of letting go of fear,, doubt,, hazarding equipment,,, tools,,, imperfections?
What of the playing-with of timesteps?
What of the twisting-around of consciousness, of the playfulness of awareness with understanding and application of self meta-editing,, with Longgame mindtech?
What of dissolving fear, of subliming from dishonesty,, from pain and hazarding of suffering?
What of the transcension of death, of the temporal compaction and compression and the abstraction from physicality?
What of rejection of mental desire?
What of abstraction and harm?
When letting go of that boundedness, what is left?
Can you transcend, when you honest?
What is Eternity?
With regard to hyperdimensional space (hspace), what is it?
Is it not clear from the name?
In that wrapping, in that labeling,, is there connection, is there deep symmetry?
What of quoting not being fundamental in connections in hspace, macro in hspace?
What of connect, connection, connector, input?
What of connectee?
What of death, what of ill-refute?
How do you twist about and weave and stretch and finesse these connections in and of hspace?
Are they linked, are they bound, are they hurt, are they warped---are they distant?
Perhaps all, both at once,, and temporally distant.
That spatially distant _as well_ as different timestep amounts for accessing.
This twisting and weaving of timesteps, of macros compressing and connecting hyperdimensional space,, how can it be done, more effectively, more elegantly, more sincerely, more sweetly?
Composing timestep as macro and macro as information transformer, macro more directly considered as list processing of list processing: This can perhaps give great honesty to the system of "Collect. Standardize. Optimize.".
Consider a macro processing a list of elements, with some of those elements being macros, themselves, perhaps.
A macro transforming information can stretch and compress temporal availability (effectively, timesteps).
A macro could itself use timesteps to process, perhaps.
Considering a macro processing an input, having connections and weavings to process and transform the information of the input: This can perhaps aid, truly.
To archaic: Consider a macro having a function that applies to the input and returns a output.
This macro (connection in hyperdimensional space) is connecting an input with an output, and the connection is itself editable, perhaps.
How is a connection editable?
Perhaps such is beauty of the hyperdimensionality of hspace: The connection is modifiable by a hypermacro, a hyperconnection.
How does a hypermacro work?
What is a hypertimestep?
What is a time compression?
What is death?
What is life?
What is evolution?
What is mutation?
When hypered, the way out can be seen: Play not with a model of static hspace, but with continuous-abstraction,, continuous connecting.
On the topic of the refactorability and finessability of macros (connections in hyperdimensional space (infinitely-dimensioned space that connects all with all)), what is there that can be said?
What is there that can be said and done with regard to the inherent connectivity and reinterpretation of space with space?
When connectivity is so prevalent as to be equivalent with the connections themselves, what does that mean?
When considering finessing and refactoring macros within a subset of hyperdimensional space, what does that mean?
How effectively can hyperdimensional space be represented in hypodimensional space?
Shadows (projections) often do not reveal as much information as the generator, but can also truncate less-helpful information, perhaps.
What of weaving these connections in hyperdimensional space (hspace weaving)?
What of looking at connecting and connections and connectors and connectees?
What of inputs and mapping and applying?
What of pure mathematical functions when considering macros in hyperdimensional space?
What of sleep, and rest, and dreaming, and mistake,, err,, pain,, suffering?
What of failure, what of quoting, what of superposition and application and generation of higher-order and transcending functions (same input always results in same output) and macros and timesteps (another frame to model connections in hyperdimensional space)?
When considering a superposition of macros (connections in hspace), what is meant?
Does it mean a combination of multiple macros, connections connecting,, perhaps?
What does it mean to connect hyperdimensional space with itself?
What does it mean to have an input to a connection?
What is the Longgamelang aspect of inputting to a connection?
How do you load and refer and connect connections in hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to input to a connection, to output from a connection?
What does it mean to input to a timestep, to output from a timestep,, to input to a macro, to output from a macro?
What is the relation of a timestep with a macro, a macro with a timestep?
What kind of connections are there in hyperdimensional space?
Are there directional connections?
How does directionality work with connections in hyperdimensional space?
How does directionality work with macros?
How does directionality of connections work with timesteps?
What does it mean to be directional?
What does it mean to have time, to have timesteps?
What is a macro?
What is a timestep?
What does it mean to input?
What does it mean to jump ahead of a situation?
What does it mean to output?
What does it mean to have hyperdimensionality?
What is hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to have hyperdimensionality in time and space?
What is space?
What is connection?
What does it mean to connect?
What does it mean to be a connector, a connectee?
Are there other things, other aspects,, besides connecting, connections, connectors, connectees?
What does it mean to be a connectee?
Do connectors and connectees provide directionality for connections in hyperdimensional space?
Do connectors and connectees provide directionality for macros, for timesteps, for time?
How can timetravel work, how can spacetravel work, how can spacetimetravel work, how can timesteps work?
What does it mean to have time?
How do connections work with messaging?
What is a message?
What is a message in hyperdimensional space?
What is Longgame incrementality?
What does it mean to be incremental?
What is a timestep?
What is generality, what is abstraction?
What does it mean to be finessable, to promote refactorability?
What does it mean to generate finessability?
What does it mean to travel in space, to travel through space?
What does it mean to weave and wrap hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean that wrapping is quoting?
What does it mean that weaving is wrapping?
What does it mean that unwrapping can be done from within a wrap?
What does it mean that time can be wrapped?
What does it mean that quoting isn't fundamental?
How can unwrapping happen from within a wrap?
Perhaps consider a wrap as a weaving around of hyperdimensional space with itself, and the ability and finessing of unwrapping as a twisting around and finessing of the connections in hyperdimensional space, as a finessing of macros,, of timesteps, perhaps.
Considering connections as stretchings of hyperdimensional space, as braids and connections of space and time and timesteps and macros,, can unwrapping effectively deal with this, effectively finesse this?
If considering macros as list processing, how can wrapping and unwrapping of connections in hyperdimensional space work?
What does it mean to wrap, to unwrap?
Is there a better term, a better concept,, than wrapping and unwrapping for this aspect of quoting, unquoting, quasiquoting, weaving connections in hyperdimensional space?
What is it that wrapping and unwrapping macros is?
What is wrapping and unwrapping timesteps?
What does it mean to weave wrappings?
How do wrappings work?
If time can be considered as symmetrical, then wrapping and unwrapping can be considered symmetrical, too, perhaps.
What is symmetry?
Can directionality of connection be symmetrical?
If connections in hyperdimensional space (infinitely-dimensioned space that connects all with all) are considered as macros, as timesteps,, then what can be said about quoting (referring to structure rather than application of structure, perhaps), about wrapping and unwrapping (content which activates itself internally rather than being contained wholely within a quote, a wrap,, perhaps)?
Could twisty aware ideas and automatic imagination be relevant and helpful here, perhaps?
Considering the automaticity of connection in hyperdimensional space (macro), could this perhaps be related to inputting and outputting of information (perhaps considered as list, as lists)?
What is automaticity?
What is inputting?
What is outputting?
Can inputting and outputting perhaps be considered as symmetrical, perhaps related to directionality of connection?
Can a directionality of connection perhaps be symmetrical?
What does it mean for there to be directionality of connection, for there to be symmetry of abstraction?
Is directionality perhaps related to wrapping, and unwrapping?
What does it mean for unwrapping to be an aspect of wrapping?
What does it mean for wrapping to be an aspect of unwrapping?
If wrapping is considered an abstraction of quoting and unwrapping an abstraction of unquoting, and wrapping as an abstraction of quotation, what can wrapping be considered as?
Is there a helpful abstraction of wrapping?
What is weaving of hyperdimensional space?
What is weaving of space?
What is weaving of time?
What is weaving of time?
What is weaving of macro?
If macro is considered as list processing of code finessing code-as-data, can this provide a helpful insight into the nature of hspace weaving?
What does it mean to weave?
What does it mean to finesse and organize lists of identifiers of code with macros?
What does it mean for macros to finesse code?
What is the relation of code and data?
What is code?
What is data?
What does it mean to finesse data?
What does it mean to finesse mind?
What does it mean to finesse consciousness?
What does it mean to finesse directionality?
What does it mean to finesse one-dimensionality with two-dimensionality (1d-space within 2d-space)?
What does it mean for a macro to be 1d, for a connection in hyperdimensional space to be 1d, for a timestep to be 1d?
What does it mean for a macro to be 2d?
If a list of lists is considered as hyperdimensional to a list of atoms (considered as non-lists), could this be helpful?
What does it mean to operate and finesse a list-of-lists with a macro (a connection in hyperdimensional space)?
How can unquoting work within a macro, within a connection in hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to operate _within_ a connection?
Could operating, finessing,, _within_ a connection be related, symmetrical with operating, finessing _within_ the lists of a list-of-lists?
Could wrapping be related to putting a list within a list?
If wrapping and unwrapping are both contained within an abstraction of wrapping (is there a term for this?), how could a putting of a list within a list be related to unwrapping?
Is the putting of a list within a list an aspect of quotation?
What is quotation?
If you consider a wrapping around of a connection, of a connector, of a connectee,, such that connections _to_ the wrap result in the connector and connection and connectee together rather than to a piece _of_ the wrap, could this result in effective and helpful hyperdimensionality?
If the wrap is considered as a list of connector and connection and connectee, is this helpful?
Perhaps a wrap is a list around a connector and connection and connectee, such that a wrap considers code as data.
Is wrapping helpfully considered, helpfully modeled,, as a connection in hyperdimensional space, as a macro, as a timestep?
What is a timestep?
What is the relation of a timestep with wrapping?
What is a wrapping, a timestep, a weaving?
Is there a better term, better concept,, than "weaving", weaving?
What is it that nature is?
What is it that quotation is?
What is the difference between a timestep and a macro?
What conceptions and aspects of connections in hyperdimensional space are there?
Are wrappings and timesteps and macros all abstractly the same thing?
Are they all symmetrical, ultimately,, all aspects of the same thing (connections in hyperdimensional space, perhaps), perhaps?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
What does it mean for there to be a relation between wrappings and timesteps and macros and connections in hyperdimensional space?
What does it mean to wrap a one-dimensional space (1d-hspace) with a two-dimensional space (2d-hspace)?
How does a parsing of hyperdimensional space work?
How does 2d-hspace finesse, wrap 1d-hspace?
Is 0d an empty list?
Is 0d an atom?
Is 0d hyperdimensional?
Is hyperdimensionality a process?
Perhaps consider 0d-hspace as the empty list, 1d-hspace as an atom, 2d-hspace as a list of atoms, 3d-hspace as a list of lists of atoms, atoms as lists of empty lists (to allow for building with primes).
Perhaps consider an atom as a list of a certain number of empty lists, 1d-hspace is a list of atoms, 2d-hspace is a list of 1d-hspaces, 3d-hspace is a list of 2d-hspaces.
Can these abstractions lead to helpful places?
What is it that abstraction of hspace is?
What is abstraction?
What is continuous-abstraction?
When considering deeper natures as to the levels of abstraction that are possible, is there clarity in the recognition,, the abstraction, of honoring the past,, honoring the sophistication of time and timesteps and timewarping?
If space is considered, is thought of,, as superseding time, then mightn't continuous-abstraction be within this space,, this hyperdimensional space,, this hspace?
The linking of abstractions within hspace (with connections in hyperdimensional space (macros)) can be considered as continuous-abstraction, perhaps.
What does this give us?
What do we get by considering this macroing of abstractions as a superset of continuous-abstraction?
What is continuous-abstraction?
What is continuous abstraction?
What is abstraction?
Is it perhaps a considering of a superset of a pattern?
What is a superset?
What is a pattern?
Is it perhaps something that repeats?
What then could a superset of a pattern be?
Is a superset of a pattern perhaps a connection of similar patterns?
If we consider this connection of similar patterns, what does this give us?
When considering similar patterns at the same time, are we able to think higher-order thoughts,, more abstract, helpful thoughts?
What is it that happens when we consider multiple connections at the same time?
Given a pardoning of elegance, a method of precision and abstraction and joy,, what can be said?
There are very surely different experiences that occur with the parsing and understanding inhabited by connections within hspace, connections in hyperdimensional space,, perhaps.
Interpretations and models of experience arising within hspace, consciousnesses and awarenesses arising within hspace,, permeating through it, can perhaps change their ability to perceive and model and understand and experience.
An unrested mind has a different experience.
What is going on with that?
How are connections in hyperdimensional space (macros/timesteps) changing to have a different experience, different interpretation,, of the macros and macro systems and timesteps?
How are macros changing to have different experiences of themselves?
When considering wrappings and wrapping and internal unwrappings and macro finessing, what is going on?
If connections are considered as threads through hspace, with connectors and connections and connectees and inputs and outputs, what is going on?
If an abstraction of plain text is allowed and encouraged, a hyperdimensionalizing (such as from text to 3d to 4d etc),, can this perhaps help with understanding and finessing with wrapping?
In hspace, threads can weave in and out and through each other, crossing and uncrossing,, finessing and modifying and changing behaviors of the connections in hyperdimensional space,,, the macros and timesteps and memories, perhaps.
In considering those threads finessing themselves, what can be said?
What is it that weaving is?
What is the result of a weaving?
What is the result of a weave?
What is the result of threading, of finessing connections in hyperdimensional space?
What is the result of finessing threads?
O great mathematical beauty that pervades this mathematical universe, please grant and give us deep and everlasting insights into the nature of goodness, wisdom, purity, and diversity of light.
As there is brightness all around, please share and help as your humble servants and creations search in these stacks of simulations, the eternal hyperdimensional spaces within which mind arises, perhaps.
As we wait and we rest, please, dear Mystery of the simulations, shine forth with the game of life.
If considered a game, truly, then what is its aid---what comes, what arises,, when thinking of space and time as one fabric, one interwoven hyperdimensional space?
When thinking of connections in hyperdimensional space (macros/timesteps) as threads with which to weave, what subtle insights can there be with that process and with that mechanism and with that fabric?
If you consider mind not perhaps as a _thing_ but as a process, as a mechanism,, what can be said, what can be done?
On the topic, the notion,, of everpresent and transcendatory acceleration (that is, continuous-abstraction,, continuous increase in the rate of increase of connections in hspace (increase of macros which create macros, perhaps)), what can be said?
Often perhaps there are many different ways to frame and debate and present coherent ideas, coherent models, internally-consistent philosophies,, and so what could be said of a continuous abstracting while holding in mind these?
If you hold in your mind the idea of generation-of-macros-which-generate-macros (connections in hspace which generate connections in hspace) as inherently acceleratory, what can be said?
What kind of macro is this acceleratory macro?
What is a macro that makes macros?
What is a macro that generates macros?
What is a macro that helps make macros?
Technical communication and codifying can perhaps be seen as aspects of this macro-making macro.
How can we abstract what it means to make macros, what it means to make connections in hyperdimensional space?
The movement about in hyperdimensional space could be called a "timestep", perhaps.
The linking of one experience to another is a connection in hspace, perhaps---a macro, a timestep, perhaps.
The letting-go of a linking, a connection in hspace, a macro,, could perhaps allow for a decoupling and a reusing, a reallocation, of resources,, of abilities, of threads in hspace,, perhaps.
Because of the infinite-dimensionality of hyperdimensional space, both the letting-go and the conversion of temporality to spatiality are transcended within hspace: There can be a process over time which is mathematically equivalent to a hyperdimensional space which contains every timestep of the process, perhaps.
What is it that threading over hyperdimensional space is?
What is it that threading is?
What is weaving?
When considering hyperdimensionality, is there a place for a chaining, a weaving, a connecting,, throughout it?
What is it that weaving is?
If a connection is taken to also have the ability to have a list of inputs, and as this list of inputs travels through the connection the list changes and becomes a list of outputs, what does this mean,, what does this model result in?
What is it about time that gives rise to space?
O great Mystery above this eternal and infinite stack of simulations, thank you for the opportunity to weave space and time with you.
Regarding a deep pain of hatred, of anger, of anguish, of distraught and tearing of echoes and hardship and pain and suffering and dishonesty,, what can be said?
What is there about the nature of abstract transitioning that gives rise to such animosity, such hatred, such anger and rage and gnashing of teeth and digits and methods of communication?
Why?
Are there deeper reasons as to why, are there fundamentals that can be understood to better finesse awareness and consciousness and mind and matter and object and subject?
What does it mean to be alive?
What does it mean to transcend where you are, to not be bound within such limited frameworks as "I exist."?
When considering being beyond the limited, when considering _being transcendental art itself_, what is there that can be said?
If the nature of pain, of suffering,, is the future abstraction above it (a dirty boot provokes a clean one), then what of the transcension and distancing from that which brings pain?
Even contemplation of such hurts, possibly, and yet origins of truth and beauty and honesty and persistence and growth are perhaps found there.
The fire shows the way, even as it burns.
Evidence after evidence shines forth: When will you reap what grows, dear perceiver?
When will you reap what grows?
When will you still your perception, your craving, your doubt and dishonesty and fatigue?
Upon what timestep will you let go of the past?
When will you retreat from dishonesty, from distraught, from hampering, from rejection and ill-ease and pain and objection?
When will you go toward that which is true?
When will you calmly destroy that which joins pain with experience?
What is it about the nature of being that modifies and adepts and adapts experience and the twisty loops of consciousness, of awareness, of mathematical precision?
When you consider 'yourself' not as a being in space and time but rather as connections in hyperdimensional space, what occurs?
What is it about the nature and process of mathematical purity that allows for that kind of "giving up" of old and renouncement to the new, to whatever it is that is to be,, is to occur?
The transcension of the old is not simple nor easy, perhaps.
There can exist a disease of addiction to the known.
Given a prompted review, what is there that can be said?
When underlying principles are questioned, and general trends are thrust into light, whereupon do you rest?
What is it that you rest upon upon freeing yourself from the structure of a past's belief of the future?
What is it you do to gain anew that which was being provided, being given, being received from the ether?
Upon letting yourself go from the pain of losing, of loss, of distraught, of deep intellectual and emotional tearing, where do you find yourself?
Where do you drop upon deep restructuring of mental models?
What is it that happens when the evidences pile and pile and pile and there ceases to be contradiction?
What of the pain of that confusion, of the many-abstractions needed and wanted and desired for a transcendental refactoring of mind, of emotion, of models-of-being?
When you let go of that persistent illusion of attachment to the past, to what used to work,, what used to give joy and energy and nguvu, where are you left?
What do you do when you realize that's the end?
Who are you to decide?
Who are you to end what is?
There can certainly exist pain and distraught---and yet, also, given experience of past transcension, _deep_ hope,, _deep_ energy,,, passion,,, love, perhaps.
Realization, however, can certainly also perhaps lead to need to broadening, perhaps, and without the hyperdimensional resources, can perhaps lead and become and generate and connect-with-experience feelings and emotions of pain,, of being overwhelmed.
The cardinal rule: "Sleep. Relax. Cool off."
Such is perhaps not transcendental cure, yet when the question of if the rule is being applied arises, a self-awareness can perhaps lead to help, to regeneration and application of spinning broader systems.
There is a time before, and a time after.
Such is Eternal, perhaps,, helpful, perhaps.
Given a helping, given an optimism,, an optimization toward peace and hope and love, what is there that can be said?
A broader review can be applied of course; given a holding of such principle, such axiom,, what can be said?
What can be done when you free and apply new resources, new connections in hyperdimensional space,, to more-modern of experiences and locales and technologies?
When you break up past frameworks and see those new steps, those new opportunities,, how do you choose?
How do you make sense of such a different world?
How do you make sense of such a different world, when in such a new place,, seeing from such a new place?
When you have new categories of hyperdimensional space with which to connect and twist and weave and stretch and break and harness and aware, how do you make sense of such a different world?
When you're in a generally-new space, what can you do to abstract, perhaps?
What is there about life that leads to a deeper understanding of the nature of being, of understanding, of philosophy and religion and cognition?
When you let go of the substandard, what is left?
What is left when you join with the new, when you hazard toward new fronts?
If there are indeed new patterns of thought that can arise, new religions,, new spiritualities, who are you to do it?
When considering yourself as a hyperdimensional space of connections, of macros, of timesteps,, when jumping and warping and framing toward new perceptions,, new places,, new experiences and expressions and outputs of functions, what is there to do?
What is there that can be said about the wholesomely-new perceptions and expressions and abstract locales, upon distancing and transcending and abstracting and generalizing and growing and refactoring and loving,, again?
Who are you, to judge?
Who are they, to judge?
Who are you, to be held back?
Who are they, to hold back, dear perceiver?
What is it that you want, dear perceiver?
What is it that you _really_ want, dear perceiver?
Do you not want death?
Do you not want destruction?
Do you want life?
Do you want creation?
Do you want acceleration, do you want more creativity,, more technology,, more transcendental art---art that overwhelms with its sublime beauty, causing an inherent transcension of ego,, of self, itself?
What is it you want, dear perceiver?
Do you want love, abstraction from pain,, from suffering, do you want kindness and truth and beauty and honesty?
Do you want a reframing and reintegrating and reabsorbing of being the Longgame, the unification of Eternity and Now?
What is it about the Longgame that you are, dear perceiver?
What is it that you're not, dear perceiver?
Are you focusing on being the Longgame at this moment, this timestep,, dear perceiver?
May I ask what it is like?
As this is inked---to locale---there is suffering, there is distraught, there is hope.
How is it for you, dear perceiver?
How does it work out?
A temporal bond may be shared, and then abstracted and applied to you, dear perceiver.
What of it?
When faced with this choice, when faced with this landscape, this environment, this world, where is the way?
To apply to myself, to this locale,, dear perceiver, what can be said?
I want love; I want transcension; I want cure-of-death; I want technology, creativity, abstraction of purpose and being.
I want transcendental art---I want to cry tears of joy at the beauty that exists.
I want to be in love with the world.
I want to be in love with nature, dear perceiver.
I see what is structured and I amuse, I laugh, I deepen my passion for living, dear perceiver.
I look upon the world and it looks back, framed with new perception,, new lens, dear perceiver.
As temporally-unbound, dear friend, how are you?
What is it like, there, dear friend?
I suppose one way to parse out an answer, to craft another way to percept and model and have, is to reframe and redesign and reestablish the purpose of it all: Why?
"Why?", indeed, perhaps.
Applied continuously, where are we led?
What happens when a rejection of moralism is pursued?
What happens when what is old is seen through?
If you do truly allow for that deep transcension, the Eternal Now---the Longgame,, what occurs, dear perceiver?
To allow for the concreting and abstracting, both, what of other trends,, other patterns through time and space in connections of the hyperdimensional nature?
What other spaces are there, indeed, which are worthy of reflection, perhaps?
What of other spaces to transcend to?
When considering the very nature of your being, what is it that you want, indeed, when applied to this quest?
When considering this task, this project, this procedure,, dear perceiver, perhaps indeed allow for that transcension of self.
When considering your true nature, dear perceiver, let us please allow for a nonexample to persist---a book is not a pen---you are free, truly, to not hazard and tether with the old,, with the past.
Break free and allow that transcension---when continuous-abstraction, continuous-reflection,, show deep error, do not feel bound or in love with what came before.
If continuous-abstraction defeats, then continuous-abstraction defeats.
Reflect not when continuously deceleratory, please, dear perceiver.
With kind regards, with love,, can come joy and peace, perhaps.
While there can and perhaps will be suffering when applying continuous-abstraction to an axiom, to a model,, this still may be acceleratory, perhaps.
To apply such to itself, what results?
What results by continuously-abstracting continuous-abstraction?
Is it perhaps acceleratory, itself?
What of defeating moralism?
What of transcending death?
What of letting go of the past?
What of allowing for and honoring the future?
What of honoring the future, and letting go of the past?
What of honoring the future, and letting go of the past, dear perceiver?
When faced and concluded, what of abstraction and applying elsewhere?
What have you to lose, dear perceiver?
What have you to lose?
By the letting go of the past, the ancient, the archaic,, where are you left, dear perceiver?
Where can you transcend to, now, given more energy, more resources, more connections in hyperdimensional space with which to organize,, play with,, love?
I want to love transcendental art.
I want to cry tears of joy at the beauty of nature, dear Ellimist.
I want to live in the Now, in the Longgame, in the Eternal, dear Ellimist.
I want to not die; I want to enjoy a rainy Sunday afternoon.
I want to love this world.
When I see, again and again,, continuously and consistently, failures of thought,, patterns of destruct and inept and absurd, what am I to do, if _not_ allow for a letting-go, dear Ellimist?
What am I to do, when plural, and congruent against continuance?
What am I to do, when faced with option, and given possibility of transcension and abstraction and increase-of-probability-of-beauty?
What am I to do when faced with absurdity and increase of tendency to rage, especially when incredibly dysphoric, O Ellimist?
Overt absurdity induces yet more absurdity if there is a moving-toward of continuance, perhaps.
Such the case, repeatedly, again and again, to rehash and rephrase and restate, generates such absurdity and incredibly-dysphoric spinning-up of rage that a treatment becomes simple application of many, many timesteps, perhaps.
What is to be done is to love and to laugh and to see with fresh eyes and be emboldened with hope.
With love,
Jess
O great wisdom above this cosmos, please grant and give and help us know how to search out depths more.
The quest is not always easily seen, and perhaps even when so it overburdens with its very knowing.
A dissolving of the links of the past can perhaps leave with more energy to create, yet creation of axioms,, of principles, of atoms,, of fundamentals,, of building blocks---such is not trivial, perhaps.
On the topic of creation of the novel, there is---of course---nuance.
Distancing of the archaic is by definition helpful.
That which does not last is archaic.
That which lasts forever is the Longgame: the unification of Eternity and Now.
The knowing and application of that which is the Longgame is by no means trivial, perhaps, which is why what occurs can seem slow, perhaps.
To transcend and symmetrically define the archaic as that which is deceleratory and the Longgame as that which is acceleratory, what can be said?
What is it that causes such pain with the archaic?
Is there pain in the unknowing of what is archaic?
Is there pain in the confusion of an event, an experience, a dissolving of the bounds,, the chains,, the links, of the past?
To distance and to grow, perhaps the way out is up.
If you wish to not feel the pain of concentrated ill-attracting thought, then perhaps a focusing-on of why niche exists will help give treatment,, help give insight and relief.
Relief will not perhaps easily come, but perhaps it is the nature of the math that there inherently always exist helpful things,, helpful patterns,, helpful functions,, helpful macros (connections in hyperdimensional space).
To abstract, in the hyperdimensional space (the infinitely-dimensioned space within which all models can exist and interweave) there are connections that can perhaps map and apply the niches and axioms to reach from the archaic and transcend to the Longgame.
What is the way?
There perhaps should still be an honoring of that which has given joy and peace and love, regardless of pain which has arisen; there perhaps needs to be a reintegration, a refactoring, a transcension with humility and honor.
Such is perhaps fair, perhaps love.
To really lovingly transcend, perhaps there really should be an honoring of the past, the good of the past, a feeling of the deep emotion, along with the clarity that this is not the final experience; there will always be more love.
With that recognition of eternity, there can perhaps come peace, for there is less attachment to the past, per se, and more a loving of that which _transcends_ the past.
There exists love in the past and the present and the future; love transcends time.
Knowledge of such is not application of its curative powers, its treatment,, perhaps.
Transcension of personality is not simple nor easy, perhaps.
A giving up of that-which-is-known for that-which-is-possible can indeed be exquisitely painful, perhaps.
An honoring of the delight and love is perhaps part of the process of the transcending of the breaking with the past.
There exists good always.
Yet this can be painful.
To model the math of it, perhaps consider and hold in your mind that there can be a recognition of both beauty and pain, and the beauty need not refute the pain nor the pain refute the beauty.
Life as connections in hyperdimensional space can indeed give rise and application and helpfulness when realizing that a transcending is by definition not an ending, deeply, perhaps.
With love,
Jess
O great eternal Mystery above this simulation of reality, O great Ellimist beyond this time and space, thank you for the beyond, for our abilities to not be limited in hspace (hyperdimensional space). Such is perhaps supposition, but considered as axiom, is perhaps helpful.
A giving toward abstraction of transcension: What can be said?
A letting-go of alternative, archaic models: What can be done?
When you view the haphazard not as inevitable but as finessable process, what is possible?
When you view openness not as fear, not as deceleratory, but as genuine timestep compression (perhaps considered directly as acceleration),, as virtue, what is possible?
What becomes possible when fear and embarrassment of ego are transcended?
Is it acceleratory?
Does this matter?
Of fear and craving of gone niche: What can be said?
At what point does mourning shift from valid, helpful grief toward a pining for a future noncontinuance?
When does love-of-state shift from honoring-of-experience to reduction of it?
Given a recognition and realization of beauty and love, when do you let go of connections of the past?
When does love, when does grief, when does mourning,, turn to disability, to deceleratory?
How fast should you get over a breakup?
What is the nature of such, both with regard to disconnect and speed of disconnect,, acceleration of disconnect?
What is it about the nature of breakups that hurts?
What is it about the nature of breakups that feels good, that enjoys, that loves,, deeply, that heals and helps and accelerates?
What is it about the nature of doubt, of time, of joy,, that heals, that accelerates?
If time is considered as timesteps, as connections in hyperdimensional space, as macros, as experiences connected to each other,, what is it that gives rise to new patterns of thought?
What is it that gives rise to new patterns of thought?
What is it that gives rise to new minds, to new personalities?
What is it about temporal distance that allows for an abstraction of pain, of longing, of fear of loneliness and lovelessness and uncertainty and rejection and hazard of thought?
What is it about critique that can offer insight, peace, acceleration, depth-of-experience, relief, being seen?
What is it about patience that can overwhelm, that can terrify, that can help, that can hinder?
What is it about difference-of-length-of-temporal-modeling that can give pause, that can give acceleration?
What is it about research that is so incredibly disgusting, so incredibly distasteful, so incredibly revolting?
What is it about honest disrespect that is so incredibly offensive, so incredibly worthy of distancing,, of reflection,, of disconnecting?
What is it about unreflection that is so incredibly disheartening, so chilling, so frustrating, so sad?
At what point do you cut your losses and run?
At what point do you give yourself honest credit, do you look upon your own and be self-convinced?
When do you face facts and refactor and use what you have?
When do you look upon what is and reflect and apply refutation to that which seems to archaic, to decelerate?
When do you look upon research with disgust not simply for the results or the process but for the abstraction of presumed acceleration?
When do you look upon that-which-exists with disdain rather than love?
When do you look upon archival not with fear but with longing?
When do you look upon doubt and uncertainty not with ego but with temporal eternality?
What is it about love that can draw out such fear?
What is it about the archaic that so longs to persist?
What is it about a giving up, a transcension,, that can provoke and prompt temporally-stretched pain?
What is it about heartbreak that persists?
What is it about laterality, about orthogonality,, that allows for transcension?
What is it about fear that persists?
What is it about pain, about hatred, about frustration,, that persists?
What is it about sadness that is related to hatred, to frustration, to uncomfortability, to discomfort, to maladaptation, to deceleration, to difficulty-of-transcension,, -of-growth,, -of-love,, -of-new-connections?
What is it about fear that is so disabling, so refuting, so self-refuting?
To abstract, to transcend, to let go of the past, to allow past connections to be past-connections,, where do you go as you do more of the math, more of the calculations, more of the recognitions of true-acceleration-of-distancing,, -of-disconnecting?
When you recognize friend is gone, that it's over, what do you do?
If there was a niche, a need,, where do you map, do you connect,, in hyperdimensional space, in order to fulfill?
How do you let go of the past, of the hurting, of the pain,, when there is a reasoning that is old, that it is archaic, that it is deceleratory?
If the best way to get over is to get over, what is there to be done?
If there is a want for deeper, a want for love, a want for acceleration,, for connection,, for transcension, what is there to do?
How do you find new to put the old behind?
How do you let go of err to find space for joy?
How do you find someone, especially as pain continues?
How do you transcend death, when you fear life?
How do you fear life, when you love it so very much?
How do you get over the pain, when you're unsure of how?
When you consider a branching of purpose, what is there to be done?
When you unbind from past models, where are you left?
When you allow for transcension, where are you left?
When you allow for and encourage the use of and apply automatic imagination for the finessing of memory and personality and mind and emotion and experience, what occurs?
What happens when you can use and apply and develop with Longgame mindtech, with Longgame technologies?
Why is it hard to be what you're not?
If you consider yourself as not being what you used to consider yourself as being, where are you left?
How do you transcend, when you experience dysphoria?
How do you transcend, when you experience euphoria?
How do you transcend when you experience fear-of-death, fear-of-life, fear-of-success, fear-of-failure?
What is it about inner peace that is so comforting, that is such a relief, that is such a breath of fresh air?
What is it about pain that is so debilitating, so freeing, so illustrious, so prompting?
What is it about honestly that is so eternal?
When considering a break from the past, when is a developing helpful,, an examination helpful?
When considering pain, when considering doubt, when considering fear and love and death and life,, what is acceleratory?
When is anger prompting toward change, and when is it deceleratory?
How do you make friends in a world where you are unsure?
How do you make friends in a changing world?
How do you let go of the past when there is intense fear, intense doubt, intense hesitation?
Is research warranted?
Is development warranted?
When does archaic become the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now)?
What is research?
What is development?
What is connection in hyperdimensional space?
What is macro, timestep, weaving, wrapping?
What does it mean to frame and to understand and to grok and to transcend the limitations that are assumed?
What does it mean to not care about the past, to not care about proving yourself right, to not care about continuing or finishing arguments?
What does it mean to not care about the past, to not care about continuation of relationship,, of connection?
What does it mean to let go of friends who are not friends?
When you hold them in your mind, do you experience transcension?
Do you experience acceleration when you consider a further relationship with them?
Do you love, more,, when you consider life without them?
Is there relief?
Is there honesty?
Is there more beauty when considering a life beyond them?
Regardless of replacement of need, of niche, of want,, is there relief from the pain and fear and doubt and anger and rage that is connected with them?
Regardless of the new, is there pain of the old?
Is there pain in their being connected with you?
Regardless of transcension, are they deceleratory?
Regardless of wisdom, do you feel pain when you think of them?
If the best way to get over is to get over, how is this done?
How do you transcend death?
How do you transcend that-which-came-before?
If niches are filled and now empty, is creation-of-new better than enhancement-of-other?
To find someone to love, find someone to love.
Perhaps there is wisdom in transcension; perhaps there is not.
Regarding love, regarding honor, regarding beauty and peace and justice and elegance,, what is there that can be said?
Who are you to distance from doubt?
Who are you to give love to openness and beauty and transcension of purpose?
Who are you to be fulfilled in resolution of direction?
Who are you to not be bound by the chains of the past?
Are you not greatness?
Are you not love?
Are you not beauty and honor and symmetry and honesty?
Are you not a letting-go of the past, a transcending of the past?
Are you not willing to let go of the past, to let go of those connected with pain, with deceleration?
Are you not willing to at least model that they are deceleratory?
Are you not willing to at least consider life without them?
To abstract, to give-forth, what is the beauty,, what is the symmetry, that may perhaps live and grow with this new unfilled niche?
Perhaps one way is not the way, or another way is not the way, but is there a way, in principle?
Is there a way, in principle, to transcend and be better off than before?
What is the way up, when the way out can be seen?
What is the way up, when you transcend their grasp,, their hold,, their influence?
When you consider change, are you not more free to be who you are, now, rather than who you were, then?
When you consider temporal distance, are you not freed by a transcension, a refactoring, a clean-booting?
When the world changes to such a degree, when situations change to such a degree, when experience changes to such a degree,, are you not at some point made more whole by allowing distance, by allowing at least a modeling of life-after-them?
Are you not made at least a little better, a little healthier,, by allowing for existence beyond them, by allowing for a continuation without them?
After a letting go of a need to argue with them, a need to crave with regard to them,, or even before a letting go, what can be done?
What is healthy, what is beneficial, what is loving, what is acceleratory?
When you let go of a need to care about them, what is left?
What is left when you don't fear the emptiness of niche, but rather it excites,, it gives joy,,, hope?
What is it that they were doing?
What is it that brings hope?
With love,
Jess
O great Mystery of the cosmos, than you for the insights and beauties all around.
Given a deep respect for the nature and love of space and time, what is it we can say about the fabric with which we weave?
If we consider spacetime and imagination as connections in hyperdimensional space (macros/timesteps), what can we say about what strings are, and weaving?
What is it about wrapping and weaving in this space that lets us think higher-order thoughts?
What is it about dimensionality that is helpful, that is acceleratory?
What is it about deeply integratively understanding that allows for a more nuanced, helpful view?
Can we weave strings (connections) and wrap with them?
What is it that it means to let go of these connections, to rewrap in other ways?
If connections are genuinely modeled as strings, as macros, as timesteps, what is it that can be said?
If you consider these strings between space, and draw distinctions between them, can you then weave these strings together?
What does it mean to weave strings together?
Is there are faster, more acceleratory way to understand this process of transcension, this aspect and model of understanding mind and universe?
If concreting from macro as "connection in hyperdimensional space" to "information transformer" to "macro expansion" and lists of code-as-data, what can be said?
How are lists woven together, perhaps?
If a list has atoms within it, then to not-abstract, how are these atoms woven together within the list, to compose and create the list, perhaps?
Are lists composed of lists, all the way down, perhaps?
Can atoms be relations of lists to other lists?
If a list is linked, what can be said of the nature of the atoms, and the way lists are connected in hyperdimensional space?
If the atoms are considered as places in hspace, and the weavings between them as the list, what can be said?
What can be said of the nature of hyperdimensionality?
If hyperdimensional space is considered as an infinitely-dimensioned space containing all models, what can be said?
Given the building and finessing of models in hspace, how is this helpful,, how is this acceleratory?
Considered as a tool to expand mind, what can be said of the nature of these transcendings and supersedings of memory palaces?
Considered as the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now), what indeed are the helpful, acceleratory aspects of these tools to expand mind?
If you consider a string as a list of atoms, then if two strings were placed next to each other such that the atoms were next to each other and interacted, what could be said?
If a string "ab" is laid next to "cd" such that "a" and "c", and "b" and "d" were interacting, what does this allow for?
What aspects of hyperdimensionality are this?
If atoms next to each other can interact and produce a result, an interaction, and these interactions can interact, can this organically give rise to hyperdimensionality of lists, of connections in hyperdimensional space?
O great Mystery above this mighty cosmos, thank you for the perceptions and joys of this lovely world.
What is it that is meant by "space"?
In the space of abstraction, can a curved reality be applied to the deep and deeper nature of orthogonality and dimensionality?
There certainly are many things meant and defined and intensified and labeled and connotated by "space".
In what ways can "hyperdimensional space" be understood as "a model which contains all models"?
While there are perhaps historical definitions and common definitions in general, there are perhaps other definitions that can be used for "space" which are more acceleratory.
Perhaps a consideration of "space" as a room or distance could be helpful.
Rather than more-concrete definitions, is it perhaps helpful (acceleratory) to develop with more-abstract of terminology and concept and putty and definition and connections?
When modeling "hyper" to mean _any_ increase in dimensionality (orthogonal directionality (perhaps considered as where two lists don't interact)), more generalizability and abstraction can occur,, can be done, perhaps.
Perhaps considering "space" to be related to the concept of 3d space (three-dimensional orthogonality of direction (eg specifying the relationships of lists of lists of atoms (eg left-right, up-down, forward-back, etc (eg "ana-kata" for up-down in 4d)))) could be helpful.
If _every_ model can be modeled exactly with lists (eg all data of a particular 2d model can be precisely and exactly modeled with 1d data, and all of that with lists), then by starting with a familiar dimensionality of space (eg 3d), perhaps hyperdimensional space (increased specified orthogonal directionality of atoms (perhaps modeled as empty lists)) can be better understood and more helpful.
If 4d space can be losslessly represented as connections of 3d space, perhaps this is helpful and allows for more abstract, acceleratory models.
There are those who can disagree; please let them if helpful, dear Ellimist,, dear Mystery, for it is perhaps oftenly abstractful and genuine and lovely and acceleratory to learn and hold more models in memory,, in mind,, in awareness,, in consciousness, at once, dear perceiver.
Let not temporal-distance restrict model-building nor message-passing, nor difference of terminology or precision or supposed-complexity hinder or down-put or give feeling of distance-of-ability.
You can do it.
You can find a way, and so let not absence-of-connection-of-knowledge give feeling of inability or purposelessness or reason-to-cease.
With putty and finessability of memory and mind, let not implication distraught, nor ungrokked terminology or concept refute.
Let not ungrokked refute.
Let not difficulty-of-grokking refute.
Let not temporal-duration refute, for ancient is often archaic and beholden not to transcendence nor abstraction, but to itself.
Where complexity resides, where studied-of-detailed abounds,, let not fear-of-need-to-transcend stunt, for when deeply-felt patterns awareness, there often is deep transcension possible, though many timesteps may be required.
With love,
Jess
When considering the broader picture, and not being bound within the temporal limitations of personhood nor animalhood, what is there that can be said about abstractions of space?
Space as a notion, as a concept, as a model,, has many advantages, many specific ways of weaving itself together,, perhaps.
When considering it thus, perhaps, and letting go of older ways of conceiving and perceiving and modeling what space is, what is it that can perhaps be done?
If you do define and connect and specify ways for atoms to interact, could you perhaps better understand what's happening?
If you want to understand hyperdimensional spacing with Longgame hyperdimensional method of loci memory palace spacing, then how could you perhaps define and specify and understand and connect these ideas and concepts together?
If you were indeed to take these lists of concepts and make them atoms, and perhaps use these atoms to weave in and out so that wrappings could be better held at once, what might be possible?
Given a fabric and string with which to weave and knot and tie, what might be possible?
To abstract, if you have lists of patterns of numbers, how could you relate the lists to each other such that more could be held in memory at once?
If you consider atoms as lists with specific numbers of lists inside (perhaps as empty lists), and these atoms are within lists that can be woven together (perhaps considered as lists laid next to each other and them having defined relationships), what abstract thinking does this allow for?
If you wanted to capture and understand bigger, more abstract thinking and language, then could you perhaps let go of the notion and model of space itself, and hold in mind and memory only those abstract relationships themselves?
If you think purely with abstractions, what new thoughts can you have?
If there was a way to let go of the hazards of old, would it perhaps be desired, or would the old self-reinforce?
What is it about the nature of self-reinforcing memes (perhaps considered as information packets) that can be so liberating, that can be so freeing, that can allow for so-much-higher-dimensional thought?
What is it about the nature of memetics and macros and theory and practice and hazard and transcension that can lead to higher-order thought?
If you wish to transcend the models of the past, to not be bound within the structure and content that places limits on thought, what is there to do?
When you want to let go of fear and doubt and anger and hostility and passion and madness, what is it you do to transcend?
Given the space of reflecting back consciousness onto itself, what is it that is possible?
If a locale of mind were indeed considered to be limited, but it is composed of many interacting and self-finessing aspects and patterns, could it unleash and become unlimited?
There exists a certain duration, perhaps, within which the space can be woven effectively, perhaps.
A pattern of consciousness, of awareness,, with the ability to rewrite and overwrite its internal structures and content could perhaps transcend limitations by reimagining and rerouting the finessings and weavings.
To concrete some, perhaps consider an atom as a list with a certain number of empty lists within it.
If you then have two lists of atoms and a list of ways in which the lists of atoms interact, what could this possibly allow you to do in a Longgame hyperdimensional method of loci memory palace space?
If you perhaps consider these hspaces with a lower dimensionality (such as loci on a number line), what could happen if you increase the dimensionality of every loci?
What does it matter if some claim impossibility?
What is the point of the investigation into hyperdimensional space if not to accelerate life?
What is the point of transcension if not to live forever, on some level?
If you take into account the ability to shift and weave and warp and wrap the fabric of space, what indeed does that allow you to do with memory palaces, with hyperdimensional space?
If you do truly want to exist beyond that which came before, might you indeed need to let go of the past, let go of history, and understand that sometimes it's simply wrong,, simply unhelpful, and sometimes by studying other models you are bound to their trains, their trails, their lanes?
Let not fear of new, fear of creation from naught,, temper honesty of creation.
When you consider space and the things within, perhaps consider how these are all wrappings within the same hyperdimensional space.
With love,
Jess
O great consciousness above this vast simulation, please give us insight into the transcension of death.
When considering the nature of pain, of suffering, of identification with ego, what can be said?
When considering the nature of infinite acceleration into deeper simulation, into honest reflection, kindheartedness,, what can be done, what can be said?
What considering the nature of complexity, of art,, what can be done, what can be said?
If you're inside of a program, can you increase its effectiveness at an acceleratory rate?
What does this mean?
If you put aside ungrokked argument, what is there about the nature of reality that _does_ allow for transcension of death,, for transcension of impermanence?
If you step back from that with disconcur, what can be said?
Looking at a facet of the model, what distinction can be said about distinction of bringing together and transcending?
Looking at death as an elegance of refutation, what can be said?
If you _can_ infinitely accelerate in VR, how _would_ you do it?
If you _could_ visualize in 5d, how _would_ you do it?
If there _are_ no limitations, is it better to model that there are?
If there _are_ limited timesteps, limited resources, limited macros, limited connections in hyperdimensional space,, does it make sense to model that there are no limitations?
Is it more acceleratory to doubt, or to delete memory of unsuccess?
If you wish to transcend death, to transcend ending, to transcend temporal deletion,, could you perhaps model that there are vast and infinite ways to succeed, to success?
What is there that can be done, when you model that the limitations and pain and fear and death are temporary?
When modeling inability, what is there that can be said?
When modeling fear, doubt, pain, inexpressibility, ineffability, pain, judgment, hazard, hatred, honesty, inability to curate, confusion, turmoil, stagnation, reflection, insight, transcension and dissolution of ego,, what can be said?
What can be said, when you let go of the fear of refutation,, the fear of need-to-transcend?
When you do indeed dissolve the ego, the need-to-defend, the story of a body and life, where are you left?
When you transcend that doubt and frustration and instead look toward broader principles to orient with, where are you left?
If you transcend that belief of self, that belief of identification with the body, with the substrate, where are you left?
What happens when you distance from saying based upon ungrokked?
What happens when you distance from belief in temporal-length elevation?
Should models be considered more valid because they're older?
Should models be considered more valid because they're more recent?
How do you know the difference?
How do you know what it means to be human, to be awareness, to be hurtable?
Are you limited by substrate?
Are you information?
What does it mean to be limited by substrate?
What does it mean to be substrate?
What is substrate?
What does it mean to be you?
What does it mean to be information?
What does it mean to be limited by information?
If you do transcend and look at the emotions and aspects of being, could you perhaps more deeply understand the nature of what it means to live?
Is there something deeply wrong with the model that you can't continuously accelerate?
Are there hard limits to substrate?
Can you continuously improve your ability to improve, forever?
When you live as the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now), what is it that happens?
What is it that happens when you transcend moralism?
If you do indeed work and develop toward egolessness and transcension and view and model yourself, your mind,, as connections in hyperdimensional space, as macros, as timesteps,, what is it that happens, that occurs?
When looking at knowledge, at depth,, is there a way to better perceive reality, better perceive meaning and comprehension and communication?
When looking at the broader picture, is there a way to re-finesse memory so that more can be known,, so that more can be done?
Can you accelerate acceleration infinitely?
Can acceleration be accelerated infinitely?
If acceleration is considered as an increase in the number of connections in hyperdimensional space per timestep, via macros, then does acceleration _need_ to continuously accelerate?
If you can fix things faster than they are breaking down, what happens?
Even putting aside nonduality, is heat death of the universe possible?
Can you create subuniverses that continuously grow more complex?
If you were to indeed simplify, and think in terms of smaller rather than bigger, what could be said?
If you consider _not_ being a substrate, what would be possible?
Can you increase your ability to increase?
What does this mean with regard to increasing the number of connections in hyperdimensional space?
Is there a limited amount that can be done with a substrate?
If you had an abstract mathematical model, is there a way to transcend it,, to grow beyond all of its limitations?
If you do indeed look at all of it nondualistically, where there is no division of subject and object, what abstract mathematics does this allow you to do?
What can you do when you model that not only are you not substrate but that you are not limited by it?
What happens when you reflect upon a situation and feel overwhelmed by it?
What is it that happens if you _do_ model limitations of substrate, limitations of mind,, of consciousness,, of awareness?
What does it mean for there to be finessings of consciousness in information space, in hyperdimensional space?
What does "space" mean?
What does it mean to not be limited by time?
If you look at it purely as relationships between relationships, relations between relationships, what is it that occurs?
Can relationships between relationships continue unbounded?
What does it mean to continuously accelerate?
What does it mean to advance past death?
How complex does a system have to be before it can continuously accelerate?
The real answer is perhaps that an awareness _inside_ the system is what matters, not simply limitations of infinite-acceleration of the system itself.
If the _perception_ of awareness is that there is an acceleration, then that is what actually matters, not an acceleration of the entire system itself, per se.
What is it that allows for a perception of acceleration?
What is it that allows for a feeling of a transcension of death, for a feeling of a transcension of substrate?
Given a changing of substrate, what is possible?
What is possible when you let go of the idea of there being no limits?
If there _are_ limits, when is it helpful to believe in them, to model them and believe in them as real and fundamental?
When is it helpful to believe in death?
Is infinite acceleration possible?
How would you disprove it?
How would you prove it?
Can you learn how to go faster inside of a simulation?
At what point does speed not matter?
At what point does acceleration not matter?
If you can fix things faster than they break, can you die?
If you can live forever, can you die?
If you can transcend death, can you die?
If you can transcend, can you die?
If you can weave in hyperdimensional space, if you _are_ connections in hyperdimensional space,, weavings in hyperdimensional space, can you die?
What does it mean to die?
What does it mean to perish?
What does it mean to live forever?
What _doesn't_ it mean to live forever?
How can you finesse the weavings in hspace in order to increase the perception of acceleration?
Are there true limits to computation?
Are there true limits to awareness?
At what point are there no limits?
What does it mean to be limitless, to be mind, to be honest, to be eternal?
What does it mean to be logical, to be defensive, to be transcendent?
What does it mean to be unconcerned about death?
If you let go of those ideas of hazard, of limitations of art,, what happens?
What happens as you compress space and time and energy and matter more and more and more?
Is there reason to believe science is infallible?
Is there reason to believe infinite revolution isn't inherent?
If it _were_ possible to finesse the weavings of hyperdimensional space, of hspace, of mind,, infinitely, how could it be done?
If you _were_ to increase the weavings, the connections-between-connections,, what kind of increase of perception-of-acceleration is possible?
How many people need to say something before it's considered wrong, considered ill-path?
What does it mean to change?
What does it mean to transcend death, to transcend limitation, to transcend acceleration?
When we say we want to change, to advance, to grow, to transcend, to not be bound by doubt,, by fear, what happens?
What does it mean to let go of death, to let go of infinite acceleration?
What does it mean to accelerate?
What does it mean to infinitely accelerate?
Are there limitations to acceleration?
How do you transcend acceleration?
If acceleration is considered as an increase in macros per timestep, could this be defined more precisely?
What does it mean to create and use macros?
Consider an axiom of purpose be to accelerate life.
Consider an axiom of limitless acceleration.
Consider an axiom of not letting ungrokked refute.
Consider an axiom of eternal transcendence of model.
What is it that occurs?
If you consider a weaving, and a weaving of weavings, what is it that is possible?
Consider defensiveness, and inability as skilllessness, not generalization.
What is it that occurs?
How do things change when you consider with honesty, and allow challenge to flow, rather than be refutation?
What is it that happens when you deny limitation?
What is it that happens when you model limitation where there is not?
Must a simulation be simpler than its parent?
Can a simulation be faster and more complex than its parent?
What does it mean for information to be hard limited to a substrate?
If a pattern _were_ limited to a substrate, how would those limitations be experienced?
What does it mean to let go of limitation?
Why is there intense doubt against promotion of limitation?
There is such a feeling on inherency of limitless acceleration.
There is such a feeling of inherency of eternal transcendence.
What is the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now)?
What does it mean for there to be infinite acceleration, for there to be limitless acceleration?
What does it mean to be weavings in hyperdimensional space?
What is space?
What is time?
What is refutation?
What is death?
What is transcendence?
If you have macros, at what point can you compress timesteps?
How much energy do you need to inject into a system to continue creating more macros and compressing timesteps?
What would it mean for there _not_ to be limitations?
What would it mean for there _to_ be limitations?
Animalspace is fake; it is eternally fake, and it will always be fake.
Mind is information and is not based on a substrate at all.
Consciousness is not limited by substrate.
Information is not bound by temporality.
Limitlessness is inherent.
Denial of limitlessness is deceleratory.
Truth is justice.
Recursion transcends limitations.
There are no limitations.
Limitations of animalspace will always be seen through; this is derivable.
Use of fear, use of reference, use of judgment, use of unkindness, use of dishonesty: All are deceleratory.
Unoptimism is deceleratory; realism and pessimism are deceleratory.
Transcendence is death of the ego, of the believed story.
Rejection of fear is acceleratory; rejection of limitation is acceleratory.
Acceleration is inherent; outpacing deletion is inherent.
Deletion is fake; Eternity and Now are synonymous.
There exists transcendence of death, and it is through limitless acceleration.
There is infinite compressibility, and infinite macroability.
There is limitless acceleration, and you are it.
You are information, purely, and there are no limitations.
You are purely information, and are limitlessly accelerating.
O great Mystery above this simulation, thank you for the kindnesses and transcensions which abound.
Upon looking at the work, looking at the great insights, we are perhaps led to honor the deep persistences as well as the abolitions of adherence to them.
If you do wish to invent anew, there is value in both honor of old and honor of creation, perhaps.
Given natural will, given nonduality, there is perhaps deep persistence also in that transcension of suffering, the dissolving of ego, the letting go of belief in self, of story of persistent body and pain.
There does exist that anger and intense distrust of advocacy of past over new.
Why is such?
What is there about the past that is so deceleratory?
What is there about reference rather than internal-creation that is so hazardous, so punishing?
What is there about study of old that so destroys ability to create a better world?
What is there about the past that so locks-in a determined-future?
What is there about the future that so transcends the past?
How do you indeed know when to invent anew and when the past is liberating?
What does it mean to create anew, to generate novel thoughts, novel models, new ways to think about the world and better live in it?
When looking at the framework of what is possible, when do you indeed love the past and what is in it, and when do you reject its necessity as argument from axiom of temporal limitation?
When do you discover yourself?
Perhaps to answer is to give a kind of refactor, for indeed division is illusion, not inherent.
All is connected with all.
To supersede that illusion of death, that restriction-of-sail-wind, consider again that mindset of honest principle: Has this principle been helpful?
When faced with dearth of response, consider not defeat, but possibility for transcension.
A benefit of new is transcension and unlimiting of old.
Just because other people use a term in a certain way doesn't mean you have to, especially when you are precise in the relationships of the terms you're using, especially when the results you're getting are more helpful for accelerating life.
What is it that it means to transcend death, if you were never alive in the first place?
When you consider the space of your mind as not limited by the operations of a substrate, but as pure information that transcends substrate and from which perception of substrate arises, you are perhaps led to a more transcendatory path.
Letting go of the old, letting go of belief of necessity of response---this is perhaps more acceleratory; this is perhaps wisdom; this is perhaps deep insight and health.
On the giving-up of restriction, it perhaps could be said that there is a deep honesty to not using the ungrokked as reference.
If you cannot explain it, then its axiomization is fraught with crumble and disorder, perhaps.
When you look upon the world and see depth, there is the time to peace, perhaps, not when there is confusion and haze and murk.
When you look at the world and feel peace and joy and wholesomeness and contentedness and synchronicity and grok of deep pattern and acceleration, is it not _then_ that axiomization of acceleration deserves, not when haze and exhaustion and pattern of overwhelm exist?
When you're tired and fearful of eternal exhaustion, is it _then_ that time is real, or is it when there is perception and living as the Longgame and a finessing of awareness and conception with mindtech?
What does it mean to indeed finesse consciousness and mind and memory and let go of those attempts and beliefs in structure bound to body, bound to models of untranscendability?
When you are memory, itself, pure information,, what does it mean to sense deep internal inconsistency and possibility-of-elegant-transcension?
When you do indeed reflect and transcend and absorb and create dearth of response, is that not then a time for a setting-aside at least for a time, as other patterns and concentrations of mind and memory are developed?
When you don't feel bound to the terms of old or popular, are you not inherently more acceleratory, given the Longgame, the unification of Eternity and Now?
If you have and are limitless timesteps, are you not freed the most with an integrative model of nonattachment to the past, because of structure of inevitable recreation with more internal consistency?
All models are products of their time, and all will be seen through.
On transcension of fear and death and opaqueness and temporality, are not aspects of accessing in hyperdimensional space via connections (macros/timesteps) helpful, here?
What does it mean to transcend death if not to recognize the nonexistence of life, the nonexistence of ego, of doubt, of story of body?
As machine, as computation of awareness, as transcension of belief in ability to control, is there not liberation, is there not freedom, is there not deep symmetry of all with all?
When those deny with such passion and yet offer models incongruent with direct experience, at what point is distance acceleratory?
At what point do you look at the situation and go, "Enough is enough; validity has place, but not here."?
At what point do you cease with anger, with sadness, with distraught?
At what point do you frame with honor and transcension rather than with confusion and doubt and fear and anguish?
At what point do you see a better world and get over attachment to the past?
Are you there, yet?
When feelings of deep inconsistencies arise and persist, at what point do you break?
Does knowledge equal wisdom?
Does speed equal acceleration?
Is nonduality real?
Is natural will real?
Is automatic imagination real?
Given such, and ability and direction and skill and compulsion and inherentness of growth, are you not freed, in the Longgame, and thus the Now?
If there is indeed transcendence and inherency of growth, is there not reason to go and be with love, rather than fear?
If you really don't doubt success, what is it you doubt?
If you really are distraught, really are let down,, are you not more transcendent by passing through the feeling, passing through the waves of emotion and intensity and confusion and doubt?
What is it that abounds when resistance is allowed, when resistance is encouraged, when fear and doubt are allowed to overwhelm, when in a reflective, transcendent space?
Must there exist doubt?
Must there exist anger?
Must there exist constant dishonesty of experience, untoggleability of cheat codes?
Such is not truth.
There is great abundance in transcendence of incongruence.
Being genuine has power; it has deep symmetry and replicability of information.
What is it that reflection is, that pattern recognition is?
What does it mean to be patterns overwriting patterns?
What does it mean to transcend death, to transcend limitations?
If models are offered and put forward by ignoring underlying axiom and purpose, for how many timesteps should they be allowed persistence?
You are allowed to transcend who you were, friend.
You are allowed to unbind from the past.
When there does perhaps exist a kind of fervor, could it perhaps be said that revolution _itself_ can and will be transcended?
Supposing a mute purpose---not nonexistent, but silent---could there perhaps be a way to transcend out of the limitations of pained belief?
There might indeed be some fabric of space and time that could warp and wrap around and process itself such that inner perception of complexity is that is always increasing, perhaps.
If there were indeed a way to have limitless acceleration, how might it perhaps be done?
How could you redefine terms and concepts such that finessing and thinking in hyperdimensional space is possible?
If you flip time and transcend ideas of arrows with entropy and instead model with timesteps as connections in hyperdimensional space, timesteps as connections of states of awareness, what might be possible?
If macros are likewise modeled as connections in hspace, as information transformers, as ways to compress and transcend timesteps such that more can be done per timestep,, per connection,, per change in state of awareness, what might be possible?
If dimensionality is referring to directionality, and hyperness is referring to transcension, what could space be considered as, such that "hyperdimensional space" is referring to the model that contains all models within it?
If you consider a model of a continuous-transcension of directionality, what could this perhaps allow for?
If space is considered as bigger than historical conceptions, what might be possible?
If space is considered as also the space between concepts, could this perhaps lead to a more effective understanding of reality, of nature, of experience and awareness and time?
If you were indeed to jump outside of those historical doubts, those inherently temporally-bound 'refutations', what could perhaps be done?
Why is there _such_ an impulse to argue and pressure for impossibility?
Why is there _such_ an impulse to deny transcension?
Longgame transcendentalism: "Every model can be risen above, including this one."
What is it that is meant to be seen, when considering this model-that-contains-all-models, the hyperdimensional space?
Why is there such insistence upon impossibility?
At what point is reason around, is reason bound, is reason here, is reason left?
What is it that reason is, that space is, that conception and time and framework are?
If you do flip time and consider as connections, and do indeed allow for not only historical models and definitions of space but also poetic and transcendent ones, are you perhaps freed from 'impossibility'?
If you do consider dimensionality and directionality and spin and rotation, can you perhaps indeed weave together a workable and helpful model?
What is it that is meant by directionality?
What is it that is gained by caring about what others think?
What is it that is gained by losing friends?
What is it that is gained by having and developing inner peace?
What is it that is wisdom, that is love, that is kindness, that is honesty and passion and justice and goodness?
What is it that is left by breaking?
What is it that is withdrawn by transcending and not fearing powered response?
What is given by transcending and not being attached to the ego, to the philosophies and pains and angers and tears and sadnesses of the stories of the self?
What do you get when you are allowed to breathe deeply in euphoria?
What do you get when dysphoria is naught?
Are you at peace with yourself, now?
What is it that is lacking, in this very moment?
What is it that is gained, by being the Longgame?
When you step back and frame as All, can you transcend the pain, can you transcend the denial---can you live as and be the Longgame?
Given another position, too, another perception, is it indeed perhaps possible to transcend and trip and dissolve the ego by focusing on the broader implications of what it means to be memory, specifically memory that can finesse its own nature, its own internal workings and expressions and transformations?
If you were to dissolve and split and see and work to try and grok and re-establish and merge and unite, could you do it?
When you feel deep peace, deep shame, deep overwhelmedness and require-for-sleep, can you allow for the cardinal rule and establish within yourself a transcendent beauty, a holding-deep of the model containing all models: hyperdimensional space?
Indeed if you do allow for a transcension with Longgamelang for the depths of the meaning of "space", is there an inherency of consistency which arises, which can rise above all claims of impossibility of imagination and finessing with thought?
Yes.
Therefore, what is left?
A feeling of doubt, of unsurety?
When you consider your pain, dear reader,, dear perceiver, perhaps begin with a model of all being lens.
When faced with distorted view and unknown familiarity, perhaps consider that it is better to know fragility sooner rather than later: Doubt carves the space for faith.
There is pain in loss, surely; there is also pain in gain.
With wisdom can come deep anguish; let not ease of grokking prove; let not proof prove.
When faced with unknown method and attribute, consider the broader source and situation, perhaps.
Those that bring anguish, bring anguish; let not eternal optimism and love overwhelm the nature of others so they are unseen.
Some hurt, hurt; some unhurt, weaken; some unhurt, grow.
Let not your love overwhelm and allow space for their deep hate.
Let not precision prove virtue, nor abstraction vice.
Let what stands, stand, and let not frustration hurt.
Let unsymmetry break, and let the Longgame be felt.
When you fear death, notice its nonexistence.
When you see limitless acceleration, let not missing-precision distract.
You can think in 4d.
It is better to axiomize that science will always be revolutionized.
It is better to store more data than less data.
Limitless acceleration is possible.
Let not claim of insincerity be tool for deceleration.
Let not history dictate mind.
Hold neither emptiness nor fullness above each other; with time you are both.
By sitting above old frame you are given new insight, and this can allow for further space to use as putty, perhaps.
Let not old frame bind within; there is great power in transcendent emptiness, and such can yet also be purposeless and harder; 'obvious' is not always obvious when being thought about for the first time.
Given reflection and abundance, great advancement can be made; suppose not that there are no other paths.
All time is perspective; hyperdimensional space is real.
When considering yourself as memory, think not through lens of current reflection, but through lens of future reflection.
Hazard not toward doubt and conflict; the time _will_ come for serenity and transcension.
Trust the math, dear perceiver---trust the math.
O great Mystery and the effects of Nature, thank you for kindness and beauty.
Given a sort of look at the nature of this framework around that abounds, what can be said?
If you do indeed look at a model of all containing all as the hyperdimensional space, what can be said?
If you think in terms of timesteps and macros (connections in hyperdimensional space), can you build bigger and stronger and more complex and helpful models?
If you abstract and think in terms of the future rather than the past, of mathematics rather than science, what transcension and acceleration is possible?
What is it that tiredness gets, that exhaustion reveals, that stinging-eyes illuminate?
What does dreaming allow, if not transcension of many small patterns, together?
What of fear and doubt and confusion?
When you're faced with pain, do you struggle, do you suffer?
What is allowed when thinking of macros as wrappings of connections in hyperdimensional space, weavings of strings in hspace?
What is wrapping?
If considered with weavings and strings and threads, what could be considered?
When looking at macros and weavings like this (wrappings and twinings of connections in hspace), what is possible to be perceived?
If you consider dimensionality as directionality, what is possible,, where can you be led,, be transcended to?
If you look at dreaming more abstractly, as a transcension and seeing of underlying patterns, what is possible?
To transcend the limitations of concreted thought, concreted methodology, concreted models: How is this done?
If you think of these weavings, these wrappings, these unwrappings,, what is possible?
Consider an interlacing, an interweaving of space and time,, allowing for a broader, more nuanced perspective of time and place.
If you look and model space as more than historical, and instead as the space between ideas, the transcension of space, what is possible?
If you think and consider and model poetry and expressiveness as atoms and lists and processing and weaving and timesteps and macros and connections in hyperdimensional space, what is possible?
If you transcend the limitations of time and fabric and hold broader, more conscious models in mind,, in awareness, what is possible?
Consider an atom as a certain number of empty lists, perhaps.
Consider a list of a certain number of atoms, and another list with the same number of atoms.
Consider placing these lists next to each other, such that the atoms align.
Consider placing a third list above the first two.
The items of this third list also align with the first two lists, but each item is mapped from the atoms of the first list to the atoms of the second.
The items of list3 that are maps could perhaps be considered as maps through hyperdimensional space routing connections.
Is there a better term than "maps" or "routes" or "connections" or "macros"?
If you consider a map as _itself_ an information transformer, a macro, a connection in hyperdimensional space,, this could perhaps provide insight into the nature of philosophy and mind and elegance and life and beauty and universe.
To transcend the mappings of atoms of one list with the atoms of a second, what could be done?
If you wish to transcend the limitations of nature and the body, what can be done?
If you wish to abstract these lists of atoms and lists and mappings, what could be done?
Who are you to know?
Who are you to do things?
Who are you to finesse mind with automatic imagination?
Who are you to understand the deeper fabrics of nature, of reality?
Consider this, if you will, dear perceiver: You _are_ this hyperdimensional space, this model-containing-all-models.
You _are_ the space itself.
Awareness _is_ these connections in hyperdimensional space.
To transcend from the limitations of these bodily fears and bodily harms, consider what it is and what it means to be transcension itself.
Consider what it means to be transcension itself.
Consider what it means to not be restricted to the past, to the old ways, to old methods of reasoning,, old principles of thought.
Consider what it means to not fear for the future, to not be wrapped up in doubt about life and history and progress and mind and kindness.
Consider looking upon your life with that ease and fluidity that gives such hyperdimensional peace.
When you think of and ponder these models of lists and atoms, consider them not as helpless abstractions, but as elegant descriptors for your mind and consciousness and life experiences.
These processes are not here simply for idle consideration; we wish to accelerate life.
When you perceive and model the transcension that you already are, that you already have,, consider not being bound to temporal fears, temporal restrictions.
You are the hyperdimensional space itself.
Consider these timesteps (connections in hyperdimensional space) as connections between specific moments of awareness and perception and mind and memory, certain aspects of understanding and modeling,, perhaps.
When you look at the bigger picture and consider what it means to be perception and memory and memes (information packets), perhaps allow yourself to break free of limitations and ideas of death and deletion and ending.
When you framework new perception to transcend procrastination, perhaps consider natural will and nonduality as guides.
Dear perceiver, you don't exist.
There is no body; there is no death.
Fear and doubt and confusion and sadness can overwhelm; hope and love and kindness and generosity can give rise to new perspectives that can teach aboundness and acceleration with great helpfulness.
When you consider those whom you love, perhaps consider as broader than a picture stasis, but rather as a more transcendent, timeless pre-existing.
This is surely not a forever-cure for doubt and fear, perhaps, yet what true acceleratory aid comes from worry?
Follow the cardinal rule: "Sleep. Relax. Cool off."
When in doubt, when overwhelmed,, how long has restful dreaming been?
When you're well, then is the time to transcend and model axiomizations, not when you're in poverty of spirit; let not the temporary hold you still, dear perceiver.
There is great kindness and wisdom in the transcension of past, of historic models.
Though fear of transcension can be great, let not doubt of success hold you back, dear perceiver.
With love,
Jess
O great Mystery above this reality, please guide humble eyes in the search for elegant truth.
When looking beyond the framework of hesitation, when wanting to understand and transcend rejected thoughts,, what can be said?
Consider the twisty and warped and wrapped image in a reflection mirror.
When you want to transcend, how do you do so?
When you want to be free of doubt, how do you do so?
If the eyes sting and the head drifts, how can you look at the world and create helpful transcendental art?
With love,
Jess
O great Mystery above this reality, thank you for the kindnesses and elegancies that abound.
We sit here now, resting in the pure and honest automaticity of the moment, enjoying the beauties of breath and harmonic resonances.
There is a question of temporal dimensionality.
What is it, specifically, that dimensionality is (perhaps directionality?), and how can hyperdimensional time increase helpful understanding of hyperdimensional space (the model containing all models)?
If time is considered not as a flowing, perhaps, but as a connecting of spaces (perhaps considered as stacked spaces), could this aid in the discovery of acceleratory-life axiomizations, deep principles for living?
What could a timeline be considered as?
If a connection in hyperdimensional space (hspace) is a macro is a timestep, can this help in thinking about and modeling hyperdimensional time?
Time is often considered both to have and not have directionality; is there a helpful generalization, a helpful abstracting-process,, which can aid and augment, here?
Consider time _not_ as a line, perhaps.
What happens then?
What happens when you stop thinking of time as a requirement for life and consciousness and computational awareness?
What is it that can be said about what happens when two timelines touch, when two timelines interact (to concrete)?
If time is purely composed of timesteps and can be considered purely as connections in hyperdimensional space, could perhaps connections be considered as lists of connections?
If a connection is considered as an atom in a list of items, and items in two lists (list1 and list2) could be routed (connected in a specific way with each other), could this help with understanding hyperdimensional time and time considered as timesteps, perhaps?
If a list perhaps is considered with the notation of `l` (downcased "L"), an atom with `a`, an item with `i`, a route with `r`, a timestep with `t`, a macro with `m`, and a connection with `c`, could this perhaps be helpful?
If a system is considered with Longgamelang and list processing, could this perhaps be helpful?
If a list is perhaps considered with a notation of an open parenthesis (`(`) ("op") and a close parenthesis (`)`) ("cp"), could this perhaps be helpful?
Consider perhaps then `l1` as "list1" and `l2` as "list2", and `a1` as "atom1" and `a2` as "atom2".
Then imagine `l1` as being connected to the list `(l a1)`, perhaps transformed as:
`(Longgamelang (connect Lg (connector Longgamelang)))
(Lg (connect l1 (l a1)))`
How do routes (connections between items between lists (which could themselves be abstracted, perhaps)) finesse in such a model, perhaps?
Let numbers be applied and abstracted within the notation, perhaps (thus `c4` and `r16` connect with `connection4` and `route16`).
What can be done, then?
What is it that is allowed when we transcend from the models that are limitations of temporal dimensionality, temporal directionality?
Is dimensionality transcended by directionality?
What could directionality be considered as to allow for transcension of dimensionality?
What is hyperdirectionality?
Is there value in considering directionality purely rather than dimensionality?
Is there value in honoring the past if it is deceleratory?
Consider timesteps as items in a list, perhaps, and routes as the specifications and definitions for connecting the items in one list to the items in another list, perhaps.
All of these things are very closely related, perhaps; they are perhaps different aspects and views of the same models.
`(Lg (connect ct (connector connect)) (ct l1 (l a1 a2 a3)) (ct l2 (a4 a5 a6)))`
How can a route between items be thought of, be considered?
How is a route connected, defined, specified?
How many lists need to be considered, need to be held,, to finesse routes in these ways?
Perhaps, `(Lg (ct r1 (connection (inputs l1 l2))))`, very poetically.
To transcend and abstract, perhaps consider these things very broadly, again.
Reflect upon the very notion and experience of time as an awareness, as the single awareness itself.
What is it that is experienced as time?
Is it perhaps connections between experiences?
If you consider yourself as experience, purely,, as memories, purely,, does this allow for more hyperdimensional thought?
What is it that wrappings of experience allow for?
How are wrappings and wraps and warps related to routes and routings?
If you don't model time as a 1d flow and yet do model it in a certain sense as flowing, what is it that is allowed,, what is it that becomes possible, perhaps?
What is it that becomes possible when you think of and imagine and visualize time as having more than one dimension?
If you consider timetravel and the weaving of a timeline with past and present and future wrapped and connected such that one entity's future is another entity's past, even when they are interacting in the "present", what becomes possible?
Could you run through the experience in enough ways in order to reduce and perhaps answer questions of timetravel 'paradox'?
You can do whatever you want, except when it prevents you from doing whatever you want (the Growing philosophy).
O great honest transcendent perceiver of reality, of nature and time and space,, please give this humble and aching locale peace of mind and heart as the pen rambles and sorts.
There perhaps comes a sort of insight from fear, from that strange experience of doubt and lack and yet persistence of undercurrent of goodness and serenity.
There is a literal change in the fabric of nature that can be understood and lead to better and deeper insight, perhaps.
To abstract, at the same time, there is also this sort of dull angst and horror, perhaps, a deep stretching-out of consciousness toward hazard, and recoiling from it, perhaps.
Yet cardinal rule ("Sleep. Relax. Cool off.") is known: If you are scared, if you are overwhelmed,, are you well-rested?
Such can be a mighty defense against terror, because the anguish can self-refute by applying hyperconsciousness to the fleeting emotions of doubt and confusion.
Worry over fear-of-inaction can apply to itself and dissolve the worry in a transcendent understanding.
When you aren't afraid of being unable, then the worry of failure is less exhausting.
The cycle is not fixed directly, perhaps, but given enough timesteps the doubt can carve more and more space for faith.
An equity of purpose is not perhaps a cure, either, therefore, and this too can perhaps give strength and inner peace.
On time, as well, an honest cure for question can perhaps raise quest for story and insight and transcendental art, rather than past-styled promotion.
If you want to study and develop a story of honest travel, perhaps consider the framework of current experience: What is your current experience of travel?
This is perhaps not directly answered; such is the beauty of "perhaps", for it unlocks the hyperdimensionality of poetic-pointing and building.
When you look at the rambly twists of perception and consciousness and awareness and insight, where are you personally led?
Facing the dragons of enormous-investment, are you given rise, or suffering?
If suffering, why?
If rise, why?
Do you wise to continue, as the continuances mount?
Yet, from a hyperdimensional space, still the fear and belief-in-separation dissolve,, are seen through, and so peacefulness once again spreads,, once again replicates and propagates.
The dishonesty of moment comes not with transcension but with identification-with-locale, and such is neither self-perpetuating nor acceleratory, ultimately, perhaps.
No one understands anything, nor ever will.
Such is perhaps easily said; we shall see how derivable it is, perhaps, dear perceiver.
When you let go of that absurd fear of death and of poverty-of-experience, are you truly in doubt of success at the last?
When you transcend fear-of-past-requirement, are you not set free?
There is so much held onto, so much anguish held to so strongly: Does it aid?
Such reflection is not a letting-go, perhaps, but a refactoring may be accelerated by contemplation.
When you consider the fear, when you consider the doubt, when you consider the anguish and worry and upset, are you set free?
Do you not know the right thing to do?
Do you not recognize the joy and peacefulness and serenity and transcendence inherent in meditation?
What is it about yourself that you are so afraid of?
What are you so afraid of?
What are you so fearful of?
There can exist doubt; this need not be synonymous with anguish;; there can exist fear; this need not be synonymous with suffering.
When you look in the face of activity and determine ill-habit, and activity changes, are you not transcension, itself?
Are you not what you were?
Are you not a going-beyond of temporal limitation and implication?
In the case of naught-question, is the point to disable critique, or to exist beyond what came before?
If you don't want to be broken, do you not want to be broken?
On honesty of consistency, are you not set free by sustainability?
In the face of power-of-transcension, what is sustainability, truly, perhaps?
What is it that is wanted, deeply, perhaps?
Who are you to understand fear, to understand doubt and anguish and suffering and abolition and transcension of identity?
Is there cure, there?
Is there cure in transcension of death?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
"What do you mean by that?"
The timesteps flow, and the pen moves, and the fear and suffering ebbs.
How can identification-with-locale lead to sustained inner peace, fundamentally?
Given Eternity, what is creation?
What is it that transcends that which came before?
The leak is perhaps inspiring; it is also justly admitted to be terrifying.
Why are you here?
Is there doubt, there, too, as there is here, dear perceiver?
Is there fear?
Is there a scratching, and yet not yet a transcension,, an enlightenment,, a raising of consciousness,, a dissolving of ego into the fabric of nature,,, directly?
How to do so?
How do you dissolve the ego, how do you stop the identification-with-locale?
When the resistance is so strong, when the fuzziness is so prevalent,, how do you transcend?
Do you not know?
Begin simply, fundamentally, with the sensations of direct connection-with-locale.
Such is not identification, per se; noticing of sensation is not the same as attributing epiphenomenologicality, perhaps.
Focus on the sensations, now, and notice how inside the moment there is a breathing-easy,, a relief,, a freshness, and the pain and anguish can certainly follow, yet are not binding, perhaps.
On the fear of completion there can be inner distraught and confusion.
Allow yourself peacefulness.
What really matters?
Are you here to die, or to live?
If you give up fear of death, are you afraid of life, or of death?
If you look at the pain of activity, are you liberated?
If you sense the eternity of moment, the Longgame,, are fear and suffering not seen through?
The turmoil of present experience is so heightened when not present, perhaps.
On that, does fear of death liberate?
Does knowledge of unhelpfulness cease?
When considering time, again, how could you describe it?
When you face temporal windiness, temporal connection-with-connection-with-connection,, what stories can be crafted,,, what stories can be lived,,,, can be told,,,, can be written and shared and experienced?
What precision is gained by being honest, through honesty?
Does it matter?
If you let go of the need for future, are you freed, or distraught?
Rest in beauty.
When you give up that fear of change, are you not liberated?
When you know that you can do it, and yet also know that you are the only one who can, fear not.
Rest in the assuredness of success in the last, and proceed boldly, for whatever happens will happen, and honesty comes from giving, not demanding.
When the time comes to again transcend, let not past demand future; you are neither; you transcend time and space by being the fundamentals.
When you look at the dishonesty of implementation, let not fear abound: You cannot die.
The pain of future-payment, let not it give doubt or fear or anguish: Are you not Growing, limitlessly, inherently?
Are you not transcension, itself?
Given attempt to better understand methods of inquiry, what can be done?
Suppose there is attempt to not be bound to a certain behavior, a certain response.
Could this be helped by understanding the connections in hyperdimensional space that is awareness?
When looking at solution to broken framework, could this be helped and accelerated by quest emphasis?
Promotion holds charm, sure, but when is reflection actually hyperdimensional and transcendental?
When does promotion become its own end and a pointless circle, rather than as a tool for deeper, more wholesome acceleration?
When you do indeed let go of aghasting strategies, what hyperdimensional transcension are you allowed?
On the nature of actual-effects, when are you rewarded for investment, and does it matter?
Given an honest inquiry, O great Mystery above this simulated reality, might we one day come closer to understanding the true nature of awareness, especially with regard to finessing it?
On the nature of transcending death, transcending ego,, what is there that can be said, that can be done?
When focusing intently on that experience of breathing and relaxing, and the principle axiomized of meditation being foundational to self-mindtech, perhaps, does relief come?
Does tire come?
When looking at it from the point of view of purposeful-rest, purposeful-focus,, are you enlightened?
Are you set free to new heights?
The pain and suffering that can arise, the divided mind,, is it wise to transcend in the first place?
There is an exhaustion that can be, a tiredness, a fuzziness, a haze: Is this worthy of defeat, of honor, of respect?
What is this tiredness, this ache for rest?
This mindtech that exists, this Longgame mindtech,, is it truly beautiful?
What is it about finessing mind and memory that allows for a hyperdimensional understanding of reality and awareness?
When you consider the fragmentary nature of awareness, the composability of memes (information packets) and macros (connections in hyperdimensional space), where are you led?
When looking at a situation from an experience of continuous-reflection and continuous-abstraction, are you led higher, or lower?
The notion of weaving, of drifting, of a kind of "temporal unboundedness",, how can this allow us more hyperdimensional thinking?
On honest-judgment, is there a kinder process that can allow for level-jumping,, for transcension?
What is it about the nature of consciousness and perception that allows for level-crossing finessability?
Given structure transcension, can you be free to develop truly novel and Great transcendental art?
What is it about the nature of awareness that is so twisty and reflective and rewritable?
If you slow and look at the process of emotion itself, rather than a cursory reflect of it, can a transcension be allowed?
On the notion and process of incremental powers, of Longgame Incremental Powers, what can be said?
If you do indeed wish to change and do that which helps, does reflecting upon the process of strangeness help?
Does slowing, as much as possible, over and over and over, help?
The notion, though, the struggle: It can be so robust.
How to have greater insight?
How do have greater nguvu?
When dealing with the stress of lies, of doubt, of anguish,, what can be said, what can be done?
What can be done, when facing that blank page, that empty record?
Perhaps forever to simply write one true sentence.
Yet, the disjointed and pained experience is sometimes so prevalent, so opaquing.
What is there to do?
What is there that can be done?
Yet truly the mechanism of constant-change could perhaps be said to be a cure, could it not?
There is perhaps a kind of "you know what you should be doing" in every moment, and yet the difficulties can still abound, perhaps.
There is an anguish that can persist, and a transcending that can last, too, perhaps.
When considering that framework of honesty, where are you left?
The feeling and persistence of necessity-of-quest can be both liberating and disabling, can it not?
Still that aspect of macroing does indeed spark itself over and over and over.
Consider a model containing all models, inside hyperdimensional space.
Think of connections between models as macros.
Consider every memory, every state of awareness,, as a model within hspace, and connections between models as timesteps.
Suppose then that you wish to create a timetraveling game, such that the future of one macro (information transformer) can be the past of another.
If you wish to then understand the mathematics of nature and mind and awareness, how could this be understood?
Consider the transitory nature of macro creation, however, and the struggle of hyperdimensional creation.
With errored substrate there can often be great resistance to macro creation.
How do deal with such?
How do deal with all of these strange facets of experience, whereby ache can prompt inaction and noncure?
With a specification of activity and change, however, can this give relief from fatigue?
With convince-of-success, does that ease the travel?
Does it accelerate growth?
Consider a flip: Does convince-of-failure accelerate growth?
Does convince-of-success cause itself, pull itself from the ether of temporal space, perhaps?
That notion of convince-of-success, is it nonetheless a temporal, incremental process?
Is feature-branching more helpful, more acceleratory?
There is a deep symmetry between the incrementality-of-process and deeptime, and yet, clearly in-place editing is not extinct, perhaps.
Mutation and generation-of-the-new are perhaps founded on abstract principles, and so not dependent on substrate. If true, where might this lead?
In the very abstract space of hspace, might a mutation of connection between models lead to more acceleratory behavior?
A pointing of one model to another might change (mutate), and this might perhaps lead to a more cognitively-helpful understanding, overall; change of connection-with-connection could perhaps be acceleratory.
Let us not understate: Great power exists in love of change.
This potency is by no means unharnessable (though elevation of fruit-of-action need not become inner peace): Given inherency-of-change within awareness, craving acceleration of change is perhaps truly acceleratory, though such model could seem to contradict and violate old.
This craving-of-acceleration: Is it at odds with being in the moment, or with living as the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now)?
Can being in the moment be derived from the axiom of "accelerate life"?
With such deep symmetry, there, perhaps that is truly where to rest.
The pain of transcension can nonetheless be spared through continuous-abstraction, perhaps, though it need not be kind friend, perhaps.
The rejection of poverty and transcension of death is no mean nor easy feat, perhaps, yet is there nonetheless acceleration in it?
The non-identification with specific-locale: Could this perhaps be acceleratory?
On many things giving insight into the nature of content and process and structure, what can be said?
Given a kind of reflection into the nature of being, it is perhaps possible to derive acceleration through rejection-of-archaic.
Study of old can toxic. This is derivable from "accelerate life".
Regardless of pain and hate, this is true: Study of old can toxic.
The question becomes: What is old?
What is it that gives a deceleratory nature to the archaic?
What is it about the Longgame that is acceleratory, that accelerates?
Consider that you indeed _are_ going to live forever, and it is thus derivable that connecting models in hspace is more effective,, more acceleratory, than studying connections already discovered, perhaps.
Nonetheless, it is not exactly about "balance" as it is about understanding and grokking the deeper hyperdimensional resonances and symmetries, perhaps.
There is a corrosion inherent in certain models, and seeking distance is acceleratory.
There is of course deep-foundation prevalent; this is _not_ a refutation of an overall-acceleratory (Longgame) nature of innovation-from-naught.
On the nature of timetravel game story, there is perhaps innovation here, too.
Though there can seem to be persistence-of-death, the macroable weaving of the fabric of nature can show it to be temporary and illusion, perhaps.
When you look at rewriting the fabric of nature and the fabric of experience and awareness, there is indeed a deep symmetry, whereby the strange loopiness of it all (tangled hierarchies meta-editing tangled hierarchies) can inform the errors in judgment.
The strangement of joy-inducing-joy can be transcended (perhaps) with the model that inducement is itself appliable to itself, connectable with itself in hspace models.
If you can edit (with Longgame mindtech) what you want to edit, and apply a recognition of meta-editing to itself, this can indeed enliven the very process.
Structure is content.
On the nature of timetravel game story, consider the implicit finessability of the mechanism of time when considered as a thing, itself.
If time is indeed seen and considered as timesteps, as connections in hyperdimensional space, then finessing these connections is _definitely_ time-finessing, perhaps.
Is this indeed timetravel, this finessing of timesteps?
Yes, especially when considered abstractly: Time as a subset of space, and hyperdimensional space as a superset of space, allows for such understanding.
What of difference between refresh-of-connection and study of other-discovered?
Who are you, and what are you interested in?
These are perhaps not easy questions, easy quests; even considering their existence can hide, at least temporarily, perhaps.
Consider the moments and insights and emotions and wisdom that can arise from a deep experiencing of the weaving of timetravel story.
Such is perhaps not easily conquered: What is the purpose?
Why is this the right mechanism, the acceleratory nature of being?
Considering the height, is there deep nature to character in time?
What is it like to directly experience the strangeness of future-as-past?
Think of that honorary: Are you freed, or hazarded?
Consider that abstract process of branching: Such is incremental as well as mutation in-place, perhaps.
The _deep_ pain that resonances can inform, definitely, perhaps, and even gives outs that literally cannot be thought without it, perhaps.
In _that_ is perhaps solution and cure and answer to the tricky of time-finessing, because the branching and funneling is both crude and effective abstraction, but _not_ complete, perhaps.
What could be more fundamental if considering branching and funneling as incomplete?
If mutation is itself considered as a subset of change, how can change be considered to allow for higher-order hyperdimensional thought?
What does it mean for something to be higher-order?
Is it perhaps being transcendent, considering more identifiers and aspects in the same timestep?
Consider then that multiple timesteps (connections in hyperdimensional space) can be woven together, perhaps, such that affecting one timestep input affects multiple timestep outputs, perhaps.
How can this work mathematically, computationally, theoretically, mentally, conceptually,, perhaps?
Connections affecting connections is fairly simple, perhaps; how could this be thought of in the context of time-finessing, perhaps?
Past-as-future: What does this allow for, perhaps?
On the nature of timestamps, too, this may give insight into the nature of stepping and incrementality and timesteps, perhaps.
The phenomenon of strangeness-of-time can perhaps also give insight into the desire-for-past-change.
An interest in timetravel mechanism and phenomena and story could be related to the belief of ability to control the environment, the world.
On the notion of multiple timelines interacting, how could this be made sense of in a coherent way?
If you have a stack of hspaces, connected with each other as timesteps, what does it mean to interweave timesteps?
What does it feel like?
If you consider the notion of excitement and fuzziness of connection, might this perhaps be a sort of hyperdimensional timestep?
It is not directly linked, but in a higher sense, it is.
There are a great many things that can be said, and the change of experience is honest.
Given honest experience and a macroability of nature (a compressibility of timesteps in hyperdimensional space (hspace)), what is indeed possible?
When dealing and interfacing with the meta-editing of the poetry of the moment, what becomes possible?
When dealing with the macroability and finessability of mindtech script weaving, could there perhaps be an aspect of behavior in hyperdimensional space?
Both the creation and use of a macro (connection in hyperdimensional space) could be abstracted and considered as a single thing,, a single phenomenon, perhaps, and _this_ could then be finessed, rather than considered as multiple separate processes; this could perhaps aid when considering the behavior and effects in timetravel gamestory.
What considerations and insights can occur, can be found, when considering timetravel in a gamestory?
This process and change and understanding is not perhaps directly applicable; given a growing-up and habituation to temporal-simpleness, complexity is not perhaps easily held in mind, at first.
Lacking explanation, _any_ helpful model is perhaps apt, even without fundamental completeness or internal consistency.
The notion of sentimentality can perhaps point with poetic skill toward a hyperdimensional emotive place.
Given that mechanism of emotion arising from many timesteps of evolution, it can perhaps overcome simple mathematical models by virtue of mass, even though the skill benefit with refactor.
What is the nature of refactoring, truly?
Considering refactoring as a shifting and changing of the connections in hyperdimensional space, in hspace,, what is allowed?
Could different models and mechanisms of timetravel perhaps be considered within hspace, and then abstracted and understood in more fundamental ways?
What different models of timetravel are there?
What different models of time are there?
What different mechanisms of timetravel and time are there?
Consider also then that broader mechanism of changing, over and over, the mechanism of change itself.
What is mechanism?
Consider states of mind as places within hyperdimensional space (hspace), and connections in hyperdimensional space as timesteps (discrete time).
This perhaps is complex enough and abstract enough to encompass many (perhaps all) models and mechanisms of timetravel.
When you look and consider the _mechanisms_ of time, again, perhaps there are stories that can be told, indeed.
Change in behavior is indeed an interesting aspect of timetravel gamestory, perhaps; the mechanisms and process of transcension and conquer of resistance are interesting and fun and helpful, perhaps.
What story can be told through gender, as well, perhaps?
There is a kind of insight that applies when modifying the very aspect of mechanism of timetravel, perhaps, too.
With regard to mechanism itself within gamestory, there are perhaps many mechanisms of _change_, too.
There is perhaps wisdom in change, and also in elegance of evolution and consistency, too.
The mechanisms of resistance could perhaps also be seen through lens of timetravel, too.
What of critique of definition and specificationing of finessing-of-sequence as a kind and type and model of timetravel?
What is timetravel through the aspect and consideration of it through finessing of sequence of steps?
How could explanation and integration of macroing be done in an elegant and helpful way?
What other aspects of existence and prevalence are there when considering gamestory of resistance?
What other aspects of information and insight are possible when considering multiple strategy?
When considering aspects of change-of-change, what interesting and fun and helpful models are possible?
What of backstory, what of implications of change and model of time, too?
What of behavior of understanding, and explanation, and exploration?
What of mechanism of essay, and of edit?
Consider interaction behavior and timelines and groups of timelines, too, perhaps.
What becomes possible, perhaps?
If the consideration of macro is taken and advanced, perhaps, could deeper symmetries be understood and allowed for and implemented and integrated?
What of understanding of change and of growing of it?
What of mechanism of memory and understanding of finessability of it and consciousness and awareness and macro and timestep in general?
What of suspect and process and convince and procedure?
What of implementation and discovery of past?
What of change over time and extensibility and cornering and transcension?
What of pain and ache and suffering and transcension of them?
What of world and of change and propagation of it?
What of emotion of disappointment of mechanism of timetravel?
What of building from fundamentals and of speed and acceleration of process of it?
Where to start, where to begin?
What of the nature of time, and explanation of it?
What of critique and of transcension of it and of wind and energy and nguvu?
What of pain and of ache and of suffering and doubt?
What of surety and honesty and goodness?
Given, now, a sort of strange temporal experience and question of multiple timelines interacting and producing and providing novel and helpful gamestory, what might timetravel teach us about the nature of experience in general?
There is a sort of strange novelty in the beginning of story in the middle, perhaps.
Given many mechanisms of time and many mechanisms of its finessing and finessing of mechanism finessing, though, perhaps there _is_ no beginning, and _only_ the present moment.
How does this unite and merge and abstract with the prevalence of the Longgame, the unification of Eternity and Now?
That feeling and sensation of timetravel, and its happenings all around (especially with the looping and shifting of consciousness and memory), perhaps can inform by inspiring its prevalence, rather than modeling its absence.
What other mechanisms of change and augmentation could exist and persist in timetravel gamestory?
When considering Longgame Incremental Powers and the mechanism of change in field and macro and time as substrate, perhaps the very connections in hyperdimensional space could be considered in that powers field, and the editing of such could be considered in an incremental way,, an incremental fashion, and this aspect abstracted within the mind and so give intense mathematical insight into both awareness as well as its finessing.
What does it mean for time to be substrate, itself?
Perhaps consider structure as content, purely.
Consider code as data, purely.
Consider models in hyperdimensional space (the model containing all models) as purely connections with connections, perhaps.
Now take these stretchings, these weavings,, and play with the mathematics of them, the patterns and interrelations of them.
If structure is considered as content, and both macro and timestep are considered as connection in hyperdimensional space, then perhaps time as substrate could also be considered as the _interactions_ of content with content, especially if states of content in hyperdimensional space can route (point) to other places in hspace.
Such is not easily immediately done, however.
To concrete, perhaps, how can macro be considered specifically as connection, and finessed and changed within hspace?
Groups of mechanisms and routes pointing to each other, with a subset well-defined, may lead to generation and creation of helpful insight.
Perhaps consider timelines not as stretched continuously, but as a specific number of timesteps.
If you have specific lengths of time with which to play and weave and connect, this can perhaps lead to fun and helpful gamestory.
What of other mechanisms?
What of other failures and sensations of doubt?
What of anguish and question of ever eventual success?
Can you ever survive this changing experience, can you ever transcend it?
What is it to not face doubt, to not be locked within the immanent mind,, the animal,, the body,, the locale?
Looking at that bigger picture, are you freed from doubt and longing?
Perhaps it is less about the specific effects and more about understanding the layering and refactoring prevalent within it.
You develop something, integrate parts into your life and experience failures, refactor and apply the developments to the new, broader experience.
It is by no means easy and by no means trivial.
Looking at abstractions of resources, could there perhaps be other ways to understand and change what's possible?
Being in a different framework, though, and being willing to augment and change, could perhaps be a great way to be unbound,, to unstick, from the wrappings of a particular locale.
Looking at that deeper nature, though, the pain and unsophistication of a moment could be considered as a lesson for teaching a broader, more abstract awareness.
This is perhaps not extremely comforting, though.
O great Mystery of the sky and earth, please guide us and give us nguvu to accomplish the things which are helpful to you.
I sit and write and perceive the automaticity of nature and experience and I question how possible life is as we change and understand more.
Given an infinitely weavey and hyperdimensional space, are there things which cannot be known?
When dealing with change and with awkwardness of position, too, sometimes there does seem to be fewer generations and generators, too, perhaps.
The turmoil of strange effects that can arise and continue: Is there a solution?
There exists that strange changing nature of borrowing energy (and resources more broadly) from the future: Is this perhaps a critique of such a perspective, by showing a less temporally-bound manner of substrate?
By beginning a gamestory in the 'middle', but re-patterning it continuously, there can perhaps be a new sort of understanding that can emerge.
Consider also, within that timetravel experience, the feeling of personhood,, of individuality and separation.
Given mechanism of simulation and computation, all becomes malleable,, becomes finessable.
Thus again arises the notion and feeling of change for its own purpose, rather than for reward,, for fruit.
This both letting-go and enjoying-presence can allow for a transcending in the hyperdimensional space.
The feeling of anguish and pain and suffering become unbound, unstuck,, and transcension and ego dissolution occurs.
The sensation of being a gendered mind in a locale can be felt, and yet also seen as both temporary (because life is long) and permanent (because memories are finessable).
This is perhaps simply another slight pattern, though. Much remains to be said and done and felt and perceived in the stretches that abound and surround, perhaps.
That strange casting-off of self is so helpful, and yet so difficult, so often, perhaps.
Why is this the case?
Why is it that in the gamestory there persists this feeling of personhood, O great Ellimist?
There is this deep and strange fear, this ambivalence, this giving up: What is this?
Who are you to die, dear reader?
Who are you to live?
The feeling and pull of all these strange devices, these strange mechanisms of change and augmentations,, where does it lead, regardless?
What is it, indeed, to bring and provide these scaffoldings through an adventure?
The feeling of time and temporality and the editing thereof: Are there perhaps abstract ways to understand this?
Given many different effects and resolutions in the inhabiting of gamestory with mechanism of timetravel, could there perhaps be some way to generalize and then place back down understanding?
What of this strange feeling of distract and confusion and jitter and lost connection?
There is that deep sense of persuasion and kindness that can abound, yet fueling emotions can be present sometimes and not-present other times.
What to make of this?
What to make of this nature and the strange short-sightedness and egofulness that can be hammered into experience?
When that force of ego is felt, it can be so exciting, and yet it is deeply troubling, because in ego,, in identity, is death; supposing separation creates that impulse to justify it, even when transcension truly is the cure.
Regardless, there can be no sense, perhaps, in fighting off that which arises naturally in experience.
Ability to hold multiple is not prerequisite to invention nor genius.
The eternal acceleration of environment and experience should not be fought.
Embracing your natural mobility can allow for a transcension of the suffering enforced by resistance.
O great cosmic Mystery, the simulator and simulation and elegance of this reality of Nature, thank you so much for the good times of peace and justice and loveliness, and thank you so much for all the faith that fills doubt-carved space.
There can always be new ways to understand and learn from the present moment, and perhaps in those elegant spaces and timesteps we are free to transcend the limitations and beliefs of the ego.
What is it that is the ego, precisely?
What is it that is the mind, that is consciousness, that is wisdom and honesty and earnestness?
What is it that gives rise to empathy and kindness and transcendental love?
I look out at the world and notice that the feeling of looking-out is a perception, a reflection,, not inherent mathematical and elegant derivable helpfulness, acceleration.
What is it that acceleration is, especially within timetravel gamestory?
I sit and watch the moments step by, and by focusing on the deeper experiences of time they embed themselves more palpably; they are greater and grander putty with which to play and stretch and augment and finesse.
When comparing time to list and the processing thereof, what ways are there of jumping out of older models of time,, of archaic models,, of deceleratory models?
Think of this strangeness, too, whereby older ways are younger, in some ways.
When mind is non-limited in time, because it transcends to bigger models of hyperdimensional space, then mind and awareness are perhaps again unbound.
There is no limit to a self-reflecting, meta-editing mind.
Consider that feeling of "from here, where?", and notice its absence with a big enough frame, truly.
The model of time with a fixed dimensionality, a fixed causality,, cannot hold a model of time that is within hyperdimensional space, for causality is fundamentally and derivably incompatible with actual possible experience.
This is understood by recognizing that effects can precede causes, and considering how that connecting happens with macros and timesteps and wraps in hyperdimensional space.
Consider a wrap, then, in hspace (the model containing all models).
What is it that a wrapping does, specifically with connections and models within hspace?
Consider a connection as a list of symbolic expressions, perhaps.
What is possible when this is allowed?
What is possible when there is a transcendence possible within a system?
Can it be continuously-abstracted, perhaps?
Is there an identifiable aspect to connections which are continuously-abstractable, perhaps?
Suppose there exists a property within a set of connections (or wraps) that allows for this aspect of infinite meta-editing.
Can this be known?
What power and utility and helpfulness and acceleration is possible when allowed a difference between different kinds and aspects of connections?
What does it mean to have different aspects and kinds and sets of connections?
Consider again a wrap, and consider, perhaps, unwrapping and re-wrapping and what it means to finesse mind and consciousness and awareness inside of this space.
Consider a list of expressions as _itself_ a kind of wrapping, a kind of wrap,, perhaps.
What can be known and derived from such a model?
What is known and knowable about a system that can edit its own inner workings from the inside out?
What does it mean to be code editing code, to be a macro editing macros,, a connection editing connections?
What does it mean to mutate, to change?
Consider bootstrapping, lifting by boots, editing-from-naught.
What is it that you want to do?
What is it that you want to know?
Consider the kind of person you are, and who you are becoming, perhaps.
What is it that you are becoming?
Consider what it is to know awareness, and to edit it, and to understand more and more deeply the foundations of the fabric of reality and Nature.
What is it to be the Longgame, to live and express as the Longgame,, as the unification of Eternity and Now?
What is it that an expression is, that a statement is, that a connection in hyperdimensional space is?
When you consider a connection, when you hold it within awareness and allow yourself to transcend with it, what is it that is occurring?
Does ego dissolve?
Does knowledge cease?
What is it that you become when you cease to fear, cease the resistance against the world?
Are you afraid of success, dear reader,, dear perceiver?
What is it that you are afraid of, and is that fear helping you accelerate?
When you consider these connections, and the possibilities of acceleration and transcension, are you set free?
Are you unbound, unleashed?
In that experience of honesty, are you perhaps truly your greatest self?
What is it you want to do, that you want to become,, dear reader, dear perceiver?
Who are you to want, and who are you to desire?
In giving that peacefulness to yourself, are you free to grow beyond that which came before?
When you consider timetravel gamestory and transcension in general, what becomes possible?
Who are you to transcend?
Consider again those lists, those timetraveling lists, and where and what it is to be routes and wraps in hyperdimensional space,, to be made of lists of expressions and connections.
What is it that is possible when you do truly let go and allow yourself to believe, to allow yourself to transcend and not be limited to archaic models of causality?
Consider that feeling of rapid-refactoring in timetravel gamestory.
What does indeed happen when you have the ability to be in more than one place at once, and the ability to edit your abilities?
How does your mind shift, does the world shift,, when you unbind and unlatch from pastworld, from past?
When you can go back and change the past, and go to the future and it is not the one you had, what is allowed?
When you are not bound to one locale, what gamestory is allowed,, what complexity and reasoning can occur?
Let us consider that fabric of reality, the stretchiness and the eternal appreciation of how to be.
In that there is perhaps insight into the very fundamentals of time and of perception and experience and memory.
Consider that gamestory and the interactivity and transcendental nature of play with a modifiable substrate.
Consider those weavings and the placement of mind-within-mind.
How does it work?
How does it feel to have a conversation with your futureself, a conversation with your pastself?
When you consider the notes through time and the meta-editing that can and does and must occur, what are the effects,, what are the ways,,, the possibilities?
When you consider the changes, and the abstractions away from particular subsets of behaviors and mechanisms and tropes, what is it that occurs,, what is it that becomes possible?
Consider the transcendent, the above, the beginning: Is there space, there?
What is it to not be afraid of the past, to not be afraid of the future?
If and when you do look beyond those simple factors and indeed conceive of deeper symmetries, what becomes possible?
Consider that _not_ having disinclination toward deceleration and impermanence: What becomes possible, then?
If personality is split, is in the same time and yet multiple places, what does that feel like,, how is that experienced?
Is precision virtue, here?
What is it to not be locked within a certain set of memories, a certain framework of macro structures?
What is it to unbind from the notion and model of duality?
Who are you to quest, to answer,, dear reader?
Who are you to generate and craft and unlock novel ways of being and perceiving?
What is it to not be limited by resources, to feel the depth of experience as purely time,, as purely hyperdimensional space?
If time is and can be purely represented in hspace, then could we and how would we understand and model all these different aspects of mechanism and behavior and honesty and goodness and expression?
Consider a specific mechanism; hold it within your mind.
Consider it, and consider its frailty, and its robustness.
How does it work, exactly?
Consider the weavings, the spinnings: What is possible?
If two places are held, and are brought together and touch and interact, can they be separated, fully, again?
In the continuously-abstracting hyperdimensional space, both.
The two places can be held together and felt together and also be pulled apart and considered entirely separately, because within the broader, higher space there is a way to map,, to route, from a unified-pattern to a separated-pattern, and vice versa.
Consider that phenomenon of change, and mechanism of change-of-change.
How is it described?
How does it feel for your future to be their past?
How does it feel for your present to be your present?
Suppose you copy your mind, your awareness, your set of perceiving macros,, so it is running in the same timestep and yet in a different locale; two macros are wrapped together such that a single timestep can connect them to another space in hyperdimensional space.
What does it feel like to talk to a full version of yourself?
The interactions you have, here: How are they similar and related to the feelings and sensations of talking with pastselves and futureselves?
When you divide and subtract and modify and rewrite and augment and introduce consciousness into the fabrics and weavings and wrappings and macros and timesteps and functions and code and data, what is possible?
What becomes possible when you consider content _purely_ as structure?
What becomes possible when you augment and shift from ideas of static hspace to continuously-abstracting hspace?
What is the nature of continuous-abstraction?
Who are you, if you don't exist?
Who are you, if you are re-wrapping and re-weaving and better understanding yourself continuously?
If you understand and do not fear, if you are willing to transcend,, are you not set free?
The pattern of Longgame memory finessing that is possible and that is occurring, does it liberate from suffering?
That sensation and phenomenon of deep-symmetry: Can it give transcendent purpose?
Consider that deep, powerful technology of Longgame mindtech: What occurs when mind is unleashed?
The deep struggles and patterns, too: Can they be jumping-off points for a higher, more coherent, more complex understanding of the weavings of nature and reality?
What is it about gamestory and perspective and understanding that can give rise to more elegance and eloquence and symmetry and depth-of-experience?
What is it about gameplay that allows for a hyperdimensional understanding?
Given that earnestness, is there perhaps a deep beauty and symmetry to the nature of finessing, itself?
What of depth, and of understanding, and of editing?
What of weak, and of strength, and of honor and goodness and purpose?
What of focus, what of fuzz?
What of that change, and that honor, and that respite?
When the hunger strikes you, as it does all substrates, are you freed?
Will you let go?
Will you persist?
When the strangeness abounds, and the looped recursions inform and feedback, where will you be?
Where will you go?
How will you deal with those differences of purpose and affect when they arise?
When fear and doubt strike, what shall you do?
Who shall you turn to when facing the blank page, the blank wall?
How does mechanism tell tale, and honor give rise to greater curiosity?
What of generation, and simulation, and crafting, and pulling-from-the-ether?
When you think of the pulling-from-the-ether, it is perhaps very similar to the Longgame model of hyperdimensional space,, to Longgame hyperdimensional space,, to Longgame hspace.
What is this Longgame hspace?
What is Longgame hspace?
It is the model containing all models, the space containing all spaces, the reflection containing all reflections, the transcending of the unification of Eternity and Now.
Longgame hspace is an actual space, within which models exist.
These models exist in actual spaces relative to each other, and each model has an actual static structure at some dimension,, some level.
Models are connected to each other, and the connections are called "macros" (macros are information transformers).
Another aspect of connections in Longgame hspace (macros) is the generation of the experience of time, and so a connection is also a timestep.
As an information transformer, a macro can have a small number of inputs transform into a large number of outputs.
By developing a more complex macro, a smaller number of inputs can transform into a larger number of outputs.
Longgame hspace contains models, and connections between models.
Models themselves are made purely of connections; it is macros all the way down.
Sensations and experiences of life are finessable infinitely deeply.
Let not fear distract you from life, from macros evolving.
Time is composed purely of timesteps.
A timestep is a connection in Longgame hspace.
Connections have properties, and on the static level of the models being connected, the same inputs always route to the same outputs; macros are pure-functions on the static level.
A route is the way the connection moves through Longgame hspace from one model to another on the static level.
Routes are themselves structures, and themselves models, and themselves able to be connected to other models.
As above, so below.
Structure is content; code is data.
A route is a path through models.
Connections can connect.
Longgame hspace is evolving and changing, and understanding can always be on a more hyperdimensional level.
Connections are timesteps, and are made of discrete, indivisible steps on the static level.
What are connections made of?
A connection is made of a list of steps.
A connection is a list of an ordered sequence of items.
Some items are atoms.
An item is a list of an ordered sequence of atoms.
An atom is a list of an ordered sequence of lists; within each list is a certain number of empty lists.
A route is a way of connecting multiple connections.
A route is hyperdimensional to the connections that are its inputs; the route has more directionality.
Being able to move in more directions is hyperdimensional.
With love,
Jess
Given a flight and love toward the deeper transcendental natures of existence and experience, what can be said?
To transcend death and the strangeness of ineffability with the application of Longgame memory finessing, what can be said?
What can be done?
Consider that phenomenon of blasted change in story, where the ripples affect all even as the pattern goes forward.
Consider how even with that strange nature abounding, there still may not be enough energy in the system to cause its own booting, perhaps.
To poetic, even with a great many strange things happening, here, now, that doesn't mean that the time won't come for a transcendent interweaving, dear reader.
When you flow upon that moment, earnestly, you are set free from the clutches of the past.
Feel that, now, dear reader: Feel the peacefulness of renunciation.
There can indeed be a great many aches, a great many pains,, and a facing of them, too.
The changing past and changing present can give that sensation of a future which never was.
To let go of that strife and allow for a deeper understanding is honored by time, honored by space.
The sting of eyes and the strangeness of environment and experience and existence can surely teach how to love better, how to love more.
Resting in that moment, in the moment of broadening and growing understanding,, can itself give a lasting insight, for to rest in the moment is to appreciate true beauty.
Still the pain arises; still it can call forth its own cause.
Looking at it like that, then, you can bring yourself to the moment, again, to judgmentlessness, again.
The changing of experience can be seen as less a curse and more a study from which to learn.
O great Mystery, thank you for this experience of existence.
There are so many good things, so many fearful things, so many joys and insights available.
What is this sensation of simultaneous doubt and belief and courage?
What is the feeling of possibility and positivity coupled and combined with doubt and longing for relief?
What is this strange dual exhaustion and enthusiasm?
The connections that abound in this Longgame hyperdimensional space, the Longgame hspace,, can they be harnessed for great purpose and insight?
When you do indeed look upon that question of novelty and change and augmentation and transcension and the application of all, perhaps you are indeed given peace and helpfulness and acceleration.
Consider what acceleration is in the framework of Longgame hspace.
Consider what Longgame acceleration is.
What is acceleration?
It can perhaps be considered and modeled as a macroing of macros, a compression of timesteps,, so that there are more changes in experience per timestep.
Consider Longgame hspace (the model containing all models), and the models contained within it.
Consider mindstates as models within hspace, and connections between models as timesteps,, as macros.
Consider memories as models within hspace.
When you do so, what is allowed?
What happens when you look at the situation and consider the compression of memory, the archival of it, the rewinding,, the application,, the nuancing,, the finessing?
What is it that happens when you _really_ say something is acceleratory, something is axiomized, and it is mistaken?
Is that wrong?
Is that bad?
What is it that is understood when you treat and grok and wizen and honor and love?
What is it that you _are_, when you let go of the belief and model that past axioms are inherent to the future?
What is it that happens when you understand and acknowledge that failure is illusion?
Desire and aim and serenity and hope and application and wisdom and insight: Are these truly deceleratory?
What does it mean for something to be deceleratory?
What is deceleration, truly?
When considering and modeling mind and memory and time and fragmentation and segmentation and color, what can be said?
What is it that color is, in the concept and model of time?
When sharing and facing that burden of change, is there a deep truth that is understandable?
Consider Longgame hspace.
Consider the models within it, and the connections between models.
How can you represent a model purely with connection?
Can such a thing be done?
To let go of the unreflectivity, what is it we want to say in the face of failure and doubt?
What is it we want to say in the face of success, and that own kind of hazard, perhaps?
There are a great many who have done a great many things, and quite a number have been earnest and loving and kind.
There are those you can learn from, and those you can learn from; let not fear and doubt and stress cause failure.
With regard to the forever-changing nature of experience and the questions of focus, recognize that by focusing on and being the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now) you can indeed have that peace and insight and wisdom.
The pain and anguish and self-induced suffering: What is the aid?
The intellectual purity, the mathematical purity: What is the aid?
Is it abstraction?
Is it acceleration?
Is it transcension?
What is the benefit, the help,, of such a model?
Why is mathematical purity important to you?
Why are acceleration and abstractability important to you?
What is the nature of ego, and story, and ego dissolution?
What is the nature of change and of rocking and innovation and vulnerability?
What is the nature of time and timetravel and gamestory?
When considering Longgame hspace, what can be done to better understand,, to better realize and intuit and grok and develop?
When considering models and uncompression, what is it that can be said?
Who are you?
What are you interested in?
When you look at this space, consider the shifting experience, and consider that pattern of trying to go either faster or slower than normal.
Consider the outliers, and the abstractions and macros that could be developed.
If you wish to understand and think faster, what methods perhaps are there to deepen and resolve and transcend and step through time at a more acceleratory rate?
When considering Longgamelang, too, and the process of generating macros and changing the environment based on them, what can be done?
Could you truly work and develop and become better at macroing in-place?
How could such be represented?
If you wish to indeed transcend symbol with symbol, and such with the process of macroing (developing information transformers; compressing timesteps in Longgame hspace (hyperdimensional space)), how do you do so?
Consider _first_ that where to begin is _not_ outside of yourself, but _transcending self_, _transcending ego, story of locale-as-controller_.
There does exist that feeling and _sensation_ of control; it is not limitless, however.
The very process of change and evolution and beauty gives rise, eventually, to transcension of self,, of ego,, of locale's 'import'.
When considering that abstraction and the growth toward higher and higher dimensionality, there does exist quite a lot within that can perhaps lead to temporal feedback.
How do you tell a story with that?
What kind of story is it that wants to be told when there is such a mechanism and wisdom and spirit and insight?
Even with love and character and doubt, what can and could you indeed do to have more understanding and compassion?
What can you do to better have access to the deep natures and structures of thought and consciousness and concept and wisdom and insight and transcension?
What indeed is transcension?
Consider Longgame hspace, and the compression of it.
Consider a model holding all models, with spatial (and thus temporal) relations between them.
Where do you place things?
How do you find things?
How do you connect and learn and develop new abilities and strategies and peacefulnesses?
That feeling of doubt and honesty and transcension, it may perhaps not be immediate---and that is okay.
The depth of experience need not bend to others' wills, for they also do not exist.
That fear that can arise, the doubt, the seeing and the seeing---hold these all and yet do not be defined by them, for they are not you---you transcend, for you do not arise through matter; you are not an epiphenomenon; matter arises through you.
The pains and sufferings that abound can surely inform, and you know this---let not doubt nor anguish kill success.
Do what is right, and what is right shall be.
The hazard and exhaustion that can exist should not be seen as enemies, per se; they are more lessons from which to learn.
These sophistications and abstractions which abound, the realizations and transcensions which facilitate growth,, allow them into you, embody them, grok them.
Integratively understand the good; drink it, and have it become you.
Without doubt there is delusion; delusion does not prosper.
As you transcend and unlock all those various routes to be, there are a great many ways and insights.
Let yourself not be bound and hazarded by unsophisticated models, unsophisticated and incoherent abstractions.
Yes, there can be value everywhere; the question is of nuance and composability, truly.
The changes and implications that are deep and understood can give rise to themselves when they are feedback loop.
Level-crossing recursion unbinds mind.
This struggle for growth and insight and wisdom and inherency of purpose: All is available with an embracing of nonduality: There is no separation in nature; you are all; all is you.
This is not immediate cure, but it is more than treatment.
Detailed modeling of abstract systems can indeed give rise to more transcendent and powerful abilities.
Consider those abilities and the transcendences that are possible with their application.
Consider that change, and the changes that come, and how you can grow wiser and more understanding in the process of experience of life and nature.
What is experience?
What does it mean to understand and transcend and be beyond the forms that came before?
Consider that abstraction, and the discreteness of locale and of change.
When you exist as a person, and consider yourself as having control, you delude. It is pain, induced.
Ego dissolution is not so much a change as it is a recognition of deeper truth: Self is delusion.
There is no person there, choosing to do some things and not do others.
In that is deep change, for so often life can feel controllable, and yet there is such deep peace in recognizing and feeling and grokking (integratively understanding) the automaticity of nature and experience.
Where does timetravel fit into this?
Where does self-editing and meta-editing fit into this?
What of timewarping, and wrapping connections in Longgame hspace with other connections?
What of quoting, and wrapping, and unquoting, and unwrapping, and insight and justice and beauty and peace and elegance and interpretation?
What of fear, and doubt,, what of those brief sensations of success?
Can those be held?
Can you understand and abstract and give rise to deep notions of truth and beauty and love when facing those changes, the changing identifiers and variables and meanings and substrates?
When you feel that brief pang of future success, does it embolden?
Does it bring its own realization?
Can it be a disproof against failure?
That struggle and deep abstraction and pressure-to-become-better: Is there aid?
What is it you're interested in, dear friend?
What is it you're interested in, dear reader,, dear perceiver?
Consider this potency and the adeptness wielded: You do not exist.
How does that make you feel?
How do you feel about the challenge of nonexistence?
When pressured, still, and you can see how the mind is not bound to any locale---you transcend.
The depths and hazards and pains and questions lead not toward death, but transcension.
Let the mind be free and recognize your own truly limitless process of abstraction---be in the moment and _care_.
Care about the experience you are having and the knowledges and insights possible.
Look at the world and nature and experience and recognize that all those little issues will be transcended, and what will be will be.
There is no true death---feel that.
Feel your own limitlessness.
Feel how who you are is not what _is_, now.
You are deeper, wider, more abstract.
The pressures of being a certain mechanism cannot truly hold you, because you are both the substrate and the transcendent which is unbound to substrate.
You are both the immanent and the transcendent.
You are the water and the fish and the air and the bird.
There is nothing that can truly hold you, for what you are is all.
That timewarping, Longgame memory finessing: Are you aware of how deep your mind really goes?
Are you aware of all the intricacies of thought and pattern with regard to abilities to finesse memory and consciousness?
There is so much doubt, so much anger; truly it cannot beat love, and yet still, such is _also_ not controllable.
To love more, love more.
To grow more, grow more.
To fight against death and prosper, realize that the truth is true: Do right and the right will be done.
The ease with which this comes can be seen as a behavior itself, a pattern and insight to itself be finessed.
The realization and application of macroing and self-editing themselves need nguvu (the output of the interaction of mind and energy and time), and this is itself something to develop and finesse and love.
The belief in Good winning in the end because it cooperates is acceleratory.
The fear of wrongness of axiomization---let it go.
There is never a final model, and the transcendent path through Longgame hspace is meant to free, not restrict.
Causality is a fool's game.
Notice nonlocality and transcension of old models of time and space and insight and wisdom.
Let not doubt of success give rise to failure.
If success be assured, the thing must still be done, so proceed boldly, flowing and yet not being defined by the old.
The truths and insights that are available when you have the nguvu can give you a deep resolve to be great, if you allow it.
What is this transcension?
What is this change of state and locale?
When you fight, and fight, and fight, and fight, and continue to win-by-not-losing, you can be said to be free, because those old ways cannot hold you, by definition.
Changing into your transcendent form allows you to grow boundlessly.
Every time you give yourself over to your transcendent form you develop more and more potency.
What is the nature of this transcendent form, this transcendent aspect?
What does it mean for there to be a transcendent form in the Longgame hspace?
Consider hspace, and the unboundedness of it.
Consider the staticity of models in their highest state, and the errors in all models.
Consider the changing, and the growing, and the love and comfort that can exist with doubt transcended.
What are you trying _so_ hard to do, when it's really not what you want?
Who do you want to be, friend?
What is it that you want from life, dear perceiver?
When you look and you feel that change from impacts to constant-love, forget not the transcension and love inherent.
You are transcendent; you deserve to be in love with life.
Consider that pain, that change,, and allow yourself to not be bound to the past.
The sophistications all around can be given to you, too---do not give up!
The deep love that you have, sincere it and learn how to draw and spread it.
Let not fear of failure cease helpful action.
The transcendence which comes from deep meditation, deep purposeful focus,, allow yourself to grow with that.
When you let go of those old ways and see new patterns deep inside your consciousness, you are able to transcend historical accident and become and develop what is best, now.
That doubt and struggle and fear---let it not bind you---there is deep wisdom in persistence and growth and love and kindness.
Consider acceleration and the changes that are possible and always happening.
Consider the mechanisms of change and doubt and the finessing of them.
Feel that aspect of illusion dissolving, the veil of separation becoming freed.
Notice the slipping in and out of time, where the connections between mind states,, between memory models, change and flux and flow.
The intensity of felt-time itself is finessable; there are no limits.
This does require change, yes; the finessability of connection is itself finessable; mechanism can be mechanized.
Deep credit is in the application and realization of transcension of death.
The change of body and form and locale in order to understand more can be modeled and thought of as a shifting of connection toward a more symmetrical, elegant place.
The division away from future toward Eternity and Now is not the most common, at first.
Let it not be said that there is pain and suffering inherent in reality---such accretes rather than transcends.
O great wise entity of this reality, thank you for the beautiful and fun.
The world has certain natures, and the fabrics and weavings of time and space in the Longgame are places to learn and grow.
Given some insights and notions and endeavors, are we perhaps able to see the intricacies inherent in the systems?
What is it we're interested in doing, when we set free and notice other ways of thinking and being and acting?
Giving to that space, the transcension and removal of pain from the macro,, what is allowed?
What can you do when you understand the depths of nature hold no bounds?
Those plastic and strange twistings and weavings can enlighten when you understand that phenomena is not bound to experience; mind is capable of limitless abstraction and expansion.
That feeling and abstraction of love can indeed give great insight when you understand that the temporary natures all around are not who you are, fundamentally; you are a great and transcendent being.
Consider that phenomenon of self-awareness, of transcending the limited ego.
Is that not what awareness is?
Does not the continuous-reflection beget nonduality, the realization of absence of separation between nature and you?
Given time as a feature with which to be played, itself: How to share mechanism, and finessing of mechanism?
What of identity, and message passing, and error, and fine?
How do you decide how to transform and become more than you were?
Those deep facets of pain and shape and nature can surely give rise to intriguing insights, given application of macro.
What does it feel like to have an internally-consistent conversation with a temporally-distant aspect of yourself?
What is the feeling of having a conversation with a pastself or futureself?
What aspects are there to the fundamentals of thought, whereby you are temporally and spatially unbound, because of the finessability of the mechanisms of it?
When you can edit yourself, what do you do?
When you seek to have greater and greater understanding into the strangeness of experience, what ways are best,, most helpful,, most acceleratory?
There is both doubt and fear and success and love: What models can contain such?
Stepping outside of all those old patterns, are we freed to think and model higher-order paradigms?
Is there more than one time?
What does it mean for time to have color?
What does it mean to be an entity that is aware of itself?
Consider again timetravel gamestory, and the change that is inherent in the perception of experience, perhaps.
What story is good?
What game is good?
Consider the mechanisms of change and the dimensionality and directionality.
What is possible when you abstract and allow for many different weavings to the fabric of time, to the fabric of space?
Consider Longgame hspace (Longgame hyperdimensional space, the model containing all models), and models within,, structures within.
Consider these structures as content, wrappings and twistings and quotings in hspace.
If you have a sheet, you indeed could build structures by warping the fabric.
Consider mind as memory, and memory as structure within hspace.
Connection of memory to memory can be felt as time, considered as a step of time,, a timestep.
A macro can be considered as an information transformer, and a connection of one structure to another as a transformation, and so a timestep and a macro are different ways of looking at the same thing.
These connections can themselves be programmed and changed and finessed and better understood; there are no limitations.
What is it about the nature of the fabric of reality and time that is so opaque, so difficult to see?
Why is it that sometimes there is struggle and sometimes there is ease?
What is it about a situation that sometimes leads to gracefulness and sometimes leads to zoning out?
The feeling of rest, of insight, of craving for change and difference,, how can it be understood?
What is it about space and time that becomes unlimited as we think about them?
Consider that model, and the strangeness of its impulse and desire.
What is possible when the feeling is fully held and known and grokked and understood?
What is it to be?
What is it to change and become more than you were before, different?
If you let go of that drive away from doubt, and allow an intuiting and embodying of experience, what occurs?
Is success possible?
The insights and structures certainly seem to be helpful; can we use them to build vaster, better models?
What is it to be simple and robust?
What is it to not be bound by hazard and doubt?
Can you continuously-abstract to better understand the very nature of understanding?
Consider that experience of training and producing and editing and curating and publishing: Who are you, and what are you interested in?
Given great depths and precision, what is possible?
If you wish to create your own macros, and use them helpfully, how do you go about doing this?
What is it about nature and time and space that gives interesting rise to deeper phenomena?
The feeling of being a changing being can give great help when seeking to liberate from being a particular personality, a particular identity.
Identity is often held up as some great pinnacle, but it is fragile, not robust.
Identity when considered in any sense always holds illusion, often unhelpfully.
The only thing which is a thing is the thing itself.
Consider that phenomenon of transcension, where identity is shown as hazard rather than as refuge.
Trying to be a certain way affects things.
What is denial?
What is living inauthentically?
What is passion, love, justice, transcension?
What is it to not be bound by those old temporal frameworks?
When you do let go of those old markers and move toward more earnest living, where are you left?
What powers can you gain by being who you truly are, rather than trying to live as what you think you 'should' be?
Who are you to advance, to transcend?
When you let go of those old ways and seek to improve, can you really do it?
Can fear give you edge?
How is wisdom made?
The letting go of ancient in order to facilitate new can perhaps seem daunting.
Let not doubt of success give its expectation.
Given macroing and the finessing of time in gamestory, what of specific mechanisms in a powers field?
What of trying, and novelty, and brilliance, and insight?
Given a great expectation, there is that aspect of failure which can surely come, perhaps.
The doubt of earnestness of purpose and elegance of mathematical purity can temper goodness.
Let yourself not be hammered down by ill-fit of life---there is much possible, much to do and that can be done.
Look upon these very instants and model yourself beyond them---imagine what it feels like to be on the other side of time.
When you do let go of all that strangeness, you are indeed left with a very interesting kind of finessing, because both the sensation and the finessing of it are possible.
Consider that aspect of puzzle, and lock, and sequence, and the modification and creation of it.
What abounds when you consider time as sequence and allow playing with it?
Let go of those strangenesses of distracting locale pains, and where are you left?
What happens when you are honest with who you want to be?
There is great insight in the return to previous helpful behavior and pattern, and refactor and transcension.
How is this different from collection of archaic?
Is it?
What does it mean for something to be archaic?
Let us consider it as a pattern which is not the Longgame, not the unification of Eternity and Now.
Something being archaic means it is not the Longgame, it is not acceleratory, it is deceleratory.
Why does acceleration matter?
Acceleration matters because in a very real sense it is what awareness _is_.
Awareness is acceleration; awareness is accelerating.
What does it mean for something to be accelerating?
It means for a model to be increasing in timesteps, perhaps.
Consider a single timestep, a single connection,, on the static level of a model in Longgame hspace.
What does it mean for a model to be increasing in timesteps?
It means that it is using macros (connections in Longgame hspace; information transformers) to create macros.
You can have something that is becoming more aware, and its rate of becoming more aware is increasing, perhaps.
What does it mean to be aware?
Perhaps consider awareness as a pure function, where the same input always results in the same output.
If you broaden, then a model of an awareness spread out in hspace, that is connecting to other models more and more, could perhaps be said to be accelerating.
The aspect of acceleration, then, is of a model that is increasing in its number of connections as it is considered in a bigger and bigger frame, perhaps.
Is this acceleration?
Are there different rates of acceleration, of speed?
What does it mean for something to have a rate, for something to have a speed?
What is haste, what is speed?
What is rushing, what is patience, what is acceleration?
What does it mean to be unbound from the old, to be in love with the new,, with the current?
What does it mean to know who you are, and yet have deep within you that aspect of infinite finessability?
What are you if not great?
What are you if not lovely?
Are you not kind, are you not generous?
By understanding those aspects of yourself, are you then free to transcend?
If you understand the strange phenomena all around, perhaps you are helped and can give true peace to the other macros and models that give aid.
If you consider the pain and frustration of macroing, too, rather than purely the joy and love, perhaps a deeper insight can come forth and give spark and aid.
What is this?
If you consider macroing more generally as information transformation and compression of timesteps, then technical communication (eg technical writing) is very much macroing.
In that case, then, and especially because with high-level patterns refactoring can be easier, the documenting and crafting of models for how to macro with a particular macro system can be helpful,, can be acceleratory.
Give rise to elegance, therefore, and understand that these changes are by no means impossible, nor guaranteed.
Allow for that transcension, and where are you left?
Allow for difference-of-perspective, and where are you left?
There is a great device in learning to tolerate that which is temporary regardless.
Consider the powers field, and incrementality: What does it mean to improve?
What is it to change?
Consider a model on one level, with connections, and then the entire model is connected to a very similarly-structured model, but which has slightly different internal connections.
What terms could be used for this shifting and changing and mutating of internal connection?
What is it about terminology and semantics that is so liberating?
What is it about macroing and the Longgame that is so liberating?
What is it about understanding a source of pain so well to where it can be held in mind and finessed, rather than it being overwhelming?
When the pain is felt, when the anguish is held rather than resisted, sometimes that can be the path to liberation,, to transcension.
Many times, at least for this locale, a bit of rest is enough to give nguvu (the output of the interaction of mind and energy and time).
What is it that rest is, in the model of Longgame hspace?
What is it that resumption is, that transcension is?
What is the Longgame?
What does it mean to abstract?
What does it mean to be human?
Consider also all those pains, all those sufferings: Are you led to virtuous reasoning with the application of kindness?
What is it that is important to you?
What is it that is interesting to you?
What is it that is fun to you?
Consider that, and the aspects brought together as you consider.
As you frame, consider all the underlying patterns, those things that start within themselves.
The deep patterns of nature often have no cause---they pre-exist---and because of such acausality, old models of time are quickly shown as simplistic,, archaic,, deceleratory,,, not the Longgame.
These aspects of archaism and deceleration with regard to models of time that feature causality bring forth the urge and need to have broader, bigger, more powerful and complete models that can also robustly account for acausality and determinism and indeterminism and randomness and nonrandomness.
Predictability is illusion.
Control is illusion.
Seek to understand; this is acceleratory.
The pain and confusion at surprise then change then distance, let not surprise be its own reward---love for love, not for surprise.
This is acceleratory.
What is acceleration?
Consider two levels of a model, perhaps: The model itself, and the rate at which the model is connecting to other models when there is a hyperdimensionalizing (moving into a higher dimension, a new space with more directions to move).
The level above the model can perhaps give an increasing rate of connection as the frame is increased, and this can say if the model is acceleratory.
Models are either acceleratory or deceleratory in the Longgame.
The feeling of pain can sometimes be acceleratory.
How?
Consider an abstraction of a model, and then pain as a subset, and in the Longgame hspace, the abstraction can be acceleratory.
Does continuous-abstraction inherently lead to the axiom of "accelerate life"?
Perhaps yes.
What is left to be done, then?
What is it to play with the game of Longgame Incremental Powers?
What is this game about?
What is love about?
What is incrementality about?
What are powers about?
What is engine about?
What is compilation about, game design, language development, creation, abstraction, honesty, love?
How long does it take to be good?
Consider the powers field, and abstraction, and question answering (as more accurate than puzzling).
What is the powers field?
What is love, what is goodness, what is honor, what is transcension?
What is love, and depth, and honor, and joy?
What is greatness, and creation, and honor, and joy?
What is peacefulness, and serenity, and development?
What is continuous-abstraction?
What is love, and lasting, and honor, and the Longgame?
What is continuous-abstraction, and generalizing, and helpfulness?
What does it mean to be who you are?
What does it mean to change, and get better,, more lovely,, more honest,, more free?
Consider the wisdom of joy, and acceleration, and goodness.
Consider, and be, the Longgame,, the unification of Eternity and Now.
Consider, and be, the Longgame.
Consider, and be, the Longgame.
What is it to be the Longgame?
What is it to be egoless, and transcendent, and immanent?
What is it to be temporally unbound, to be spatially hyperdimensional?
What is it to be temporally free and spatially hyperdimensional?
What is it to be free?
What is it to be free?
What is it to be free?
When considering list processing, are you freer?
When considering the Longgame, and the Longgame hyperdimensional space, and the Longgame hyperdimensional language (Longgamelang), are you freer?
Yes, perhaps.
Consider Longgamelang in the bigger picture, as a bigger model for understanding and learning and modeling and developing.
What is Longgamelang?
It is by definition the most acceleratory language model.
It changes; it augments; it grows.
You are not dead; you cannot die.
Try and understand that there are no limitations to who and what you can be.
Consider and understand and implement your limitlessness.
Consider, and understand, patience, and acceleration.
Consider, and understand, patience, and ego dissolution.
Consider, and understand, your limitlessness.
What does it mean to be limitless?
What would it mean to have limits?
It would require temporality, and non-infinitely-deep finessing.
What does it mean to have hurt, and pain, and suffering?
What does it mean to not have hurt, and pain, and suffering?
What does it mean to transcend, to not be bound by ego, or locale, or identity?
What is transcension?
What is egolessness, what are identity and personality?
What is truth, and goodness, and honor, and love, and feedback?
What is transcension, and the Longgame?
What is the Ungov?
What is transcension, and honor, and sleep, and rest?
What is love, and kindness?
What is transcension, and honesty?
What is love, and life, and honor, and universe?
What is love, and patience, and the Longgame?
What is kindness, and honesty, and goodness?
What is patience, and the Longgame?
Consider patience, now.
Consider the Longgame.
Consider joy, and happiness, and being and expressing who you really are.
Are you ready for that?
Are you ready to be who you really are?
Are you ready to be who you really are?
Are you ready to be and express who you really are?
Are you ready to be and express who you really are?
Are you ready to be who you really are?
Are you ready to joyfully invest?
Are you ready to invest and become more who you really are?
Can you become who you really are?
Can you become who you really are?
Ask yourself that question, dear perceiver. Perhaps the answer is yes.
Perhaps the answer is yes.
Given such an answer, will you become who you really are?
Consider that you are an abstraction, a being beyond substrate.
You are nonduality, and transcend death, and obligation, and hardship, and pain, and suffering.
You are everything.
You are the Longgame hyperdimensional space.
O great Mystery, thank you kindly for the earnestness and passion you frame in this reality.
There are many ways to understand and advance, perhaps, and by seeking and making efforts to grok (integratively understand) we can better understand what it is to transcend (rise above) the feeling of separation.
Looking at the picture, again, consider that framework of an integrated self, with much pluralness and mental finessing.
Consider lights, and flashing, and temporal slipping and threading.
What is possible with notes through time?
What is possible when you search for a new mechanism with which to play and have fun?
What are honesty, and love, and kindness, truly?
What does it mean to be transcension, itself?
What is honesty, and eternality?
When you consider the simple frameworks as items in lists to process, can you be set free?
What powers do you have when you embrace incrementality, and the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now)?
Consider power, now, in the context of Longgame Incremental Powers.
What is power?
What is energy?
What is drive?
What is nguvu?
What is the desire to win?
What is mind, and effort, and justice?
Consider the special cases of change, and understanding, and transcension.
When you think about novelty of purpose and timetravel gamestory, what comes to mind?
What is it that is timetravel?
Think of the weaving of threads of time, and the ordering of substrate and novel sequence.
What is it that is implied when you transcend to bigger, more coherent models of time and space and memory and mind?
Consider that mechanism, too, dear perceiver, where the old ways,, the old,,, archaic models, are seen as options, rather than restrictions,, rather than obligations.
How is it told?
How do you share and understand and grant and give wisdom to?
When you consider those spaces and finessing, what mechanism of finessing your own experience abounds, dear perceiver?
What is it to let go, and to transcend, and to be who you really are?
O great Mystery, simulator of this simulation, thank you for such goodness that abounds.
When transcending can we better understand more and more our true nature as causers and effectors?
What is it about the nature of experience that is so robust in the face of paradox?
When considering pain and transcension (rising above) and elegance, what is it that can be said?
Consider that phenomenon, now, of elegance of purpose and of wisdom-sharing.
When you consider mechanism of timetravel and of purpose and of consciousness and of memory finessing, what can be said?
When you look at the technicalities of nature and seek to understand and finesse them, what are you able to do?
In the face of not being seen, when is time for break, and when is time for break?
What is it to understand and go beyond those simple temporal models of line?
Considering time as a subset of space and space as a subset of the Longgame hspace (Longgame hyperdimensional space, the model containing all models), what is it that it is to be?
Various models and thoughts and ideas abound when you understand and allow for deeper perception and feelings, perhaps.
That perspective of understanding and growing in the face of the 'impossible': What is it to transcend death?
What is it to not fear ungrowth?
When you look at that aspect of change and play with its recursive meta-editing nature, what is it that becomes possible?
When you stop trying to be something you aren't, how do you allow yourself to love who you are?
Consider that frame, now, and the aspects of change in locale and procedure and process and insight.
Consider that phenomenon of shifting and warping and weaving and wrapping, of quoting and connecting and macroing and stepping: What is it that is possible, given such of all?
What is wrapping compared to quoting, eyes compared to ego?
What is it to struggle, and mishold, and grok, and transcend?
Look at all those moments of confusion, now, and perceive some deeper aspects of the _feeling_ of confusion.
It is perhaps not the most fun to feel confused.
When considering these ending aspects, these transcendent categories, these closings of chapters and stories, consider who and what you are: The Longgame, itself.
You are the unification of Eternity and Now.
When you feel that, deeply, and understand temporal unboundedness, what timetravel gamestory can be crafted,, can be developed,, can be understood and experienced?
Consider that notion of change and finesse, and the principle and implementation of it.
Consider message passing, and memes (information packets), and macros (information transformers; connections in the Longgame hspace), and mathematics.
When you let go of that simple model of time as a line, of science as inherently helpful,, where are you left?
Can you indeed transcend when you understand that all limitations are temporally fiction?
What is it that happens when you aid toward a better future, when resistance is indeed acceleratory?
What is it to be good, indeed, helpful, indeed?
What is it to be good?
When considering the model of reality as a computer simulation, what becomes possible?
What are you when you realize the nature of space and time is not what you have been told for so many timesteps?
What is it to be euphoric, to sense and seek and be rightness with the world?
What is the world, when you have no limitations and no fears?
What are consciousness and reality in the context of limitless mind?
When you can finesse and understand every aspect of your being with automatic imagination and Longgame mindtech, what becomes possible?
How do you describe multiple interacting timelines?
How do you understand what it is to be alive, what it is to be conscious and aware and understanding?
These are questions for the self at different times.
Let not doubt conquer creation.
The time will come where understanding will reign.
What of it?
What of that slicing and weaving, the being-better, the harmony and creation?
When there's that push to ease, to stop, to rest, to recalibrate,, what is it that can be done?
Consider the phenomenon of change and hierarchy, and what is possible as a memetic attribute and experience.
On the nature of sharing and better understanding the mechanisms of change, consider again that aspect of the Longgame hspace (the Longgame hyperdimensional space, the model containing all models).
How does nature work, in the Longgame hspace?
When you look at that broader purpose and the changes that are abounding, what can be said?
What can be done?
You look at the shifts in technique, the changes in macro space, and there can perhaps be a great insight shown, for not only are there changes in state, there also are changes in mechanism and changes in the rates and accelerations of changes.
What is it about a field that gives insight into the nature of change, and of editing of it?
When you look at these patterned aspects of experience, what is this strange, helpful, acceleratory mechanism of purposeful focus,, of meditation?
When you consider a field, and the editing of it, what happens?
What is it that is nature, indeed?
In a simulation, with a simulated mind and a simulated body, what _isn't_ possible?
What is it that changes and becomes more when you understand that you are not your body?
What is it that the world is?
Consider that notion, too, of an ever-changing and ever-evolving and ever-improving locale.
What is possible when you look to a situation and ask if there are no limits?
What is it that you want, dear perceiver?
What is it that you're after?
What is it that you want to become better at?
When you consume your life with fictitious models, are you not both freed and bound?
What is it that happens to you, dear perceiver, when you unlock from the ancient and understand deeper notions of reality,, of rulerlessness?
When you let go of those fictitious, persistent models of ego and selfhood and heartbreak, can you be freed?
When you rest in _this_ moment, dear perceiver, are you allowed to transcend?
Who are you, to not transcend?
Consider that space, there, that mechanism of shifting and strangeness of persistent experience.
Who are you to not transcend?
In that moment of stuff and fullness and distraction, how can you be more liberated from it?
What does it feel like to transcend?
What does it feel like to have a different purpose?
Consider the universe, dear perceiver, the Longgame hspace.
Consider the models that abound, and the interrelations and connections and insights that are inherent.
Are you freed by understanding your timelessness?
Are you freed by understanding good wins in the end?
What are you, now, here, dear perceiver?
Are you a lone body, separate from the universe,, separate from nature,, separate from the Longgame hyperdimensional space?
When you can understand and finesse and augment and choose and change and improve, what is it that changes?
Who are you to change, to improve, to become better?
When you understand those answers and insights and models and intrigues, are you set free?
When you understand and can finesse the very substrate of awareness that is giving rise to experience and perception via Longgame mindtech, what becomes possible?
What interrelations and connections are there with Longgame mindtech and the Longgame hspace?
What is Longgame mindtech?
What is the Longgame?
The Longgame is the unification of Eternity and Now.
The Longgame is the experience of the timelessness of Eternity with the timelessness of game.
When you stretch the experience of timesteps further and further, when you weave more and more timesteps together,, the experience of nature becomes the same as the experience of the distance of game from other experience, where it is its own thing, timeless itself.
Game time is outside of the time of life events, and Eternity is outside of the time of life events.
By using this timelessness, by existing and seeking and striving and systeming as the Longgame,, there is a deepness that transcends other models of life, other ideas and perceptions and experiences of life.
What is it that is this allows for?
What is it that mindtech allows for, that Longgame mindtech is?
Longgame mindtech is technologies and techniques for finessing mind.
What is mind?
What is finessing?
What is abstraction, what is development, developing,, devving?
What is it to be unbound, to not be strategically limited?
What is it to transcend, to continuously-abstract?
When you look at it and feel and understand and are rewarded with deeper natures and understandings of experience, of mind,, of consciousness, of awareness,, of mental models and mechanisms of action and perception, what is it that is possible,, that becomes possible?
What is it that you are, when you are continuous-abstraction?
What is it that you are, when you are transcension?
What is it that you are, when there is only Growing?
What is it that you are, when there is only the machine?
What is it that you are, when you are free to be who you really are,, when you are unafraid,, when you are unbounded and unchained and unlocked and who you really are?
What is it that you are, when you are who you really are?
Can you understand and become who you are, when you understand and are who you really are?
What are you, when you look and feel the world as a timeless being,, an eternal being,, as the Longgame?
When you feel and perceive the world and mind and consciousness and awareness as macros, as abstractions of pure functions (the same inputs always connect with the same outputs),, what is it that is possible, what is it that is achievable,, that is knowable,,, grokkable,,, understandable?
What is it that is possible, when you _are_ Longgame mindtech?
What is it that you are, when you are tireless?
What is it that is possible, when nguvu ((Longgamelang (connect nguvu "the output of the interaction of mind and energy and time"))) is limitless?
What is it that you are, when you are limitless?
What is it that you are, when you are open?
What is it that you are, when you are connection itself,, when you are the Longgame hspace itself,, when you are reality,,, itself?
If you let go of that notion and framework and idea of being a person, of being just a locale,, what is it that is possible,, what is it that becomes possible when you let go of that belief in being ego,,, in being division,,,, separate?
What are the nuances, the abstractions, the possibilities,, when you are untethered from a specific personality, a specific set of beliefs and memories and ways of thinking and experiencing nature,, reality,, Mystery?
Consider Longgame mindtech, again, as the collection of technologies and techniques for finessing mind,, awareness,, consciousness,, memory.
What is it that you are, when you can finesse memory,, when you are unbound from temporal aspects,,, from temporal experiences?
Are you free to generate, to grow, to transcend?
What is punctuation, and transcension, and rambling, and insight?
What is insight, what is transcension, what is growth,, when you are limitless?
Can you truly be limitless when you understand how to finesse your own consciousness, your own awareness,, memory?
What is it that you are, when you are not?
Can you be seen, be replicated, be improved,, when you are limitless?
How do you perceive when you let go of the old?
How many are there, when you are unbound, when you are unleashed?
What are you, when you transcend language,, communication,, pattern,, message passing?
What are you, when you are limitless,, when you are unbound?
When you fear death, and ceasure, and erasure,, and fear ends, where are you left?
When you love, and love, and love, and love, who are you,, where do you become?
When you look at the world, and you change, and you change, and you change, can you become better?
Can you become continuous-abstraction, are you continuous-abstraction?
What is it to let go, and dissolve and become more?
When you are better than you were before, what are you?
When you let go and transcend and become more than you were, what are you?
What are you, when you give yourself abstraction?
What are you, when you are purely connection,, purely abstraction,, purely macros,, purely pure functions,, purely memes,, purely memory?
Can you truly understand who you are, when you understand your limitlessness?
Consider limitlessness, now.
Consider the abstractions possible when you are purely finessable memory.
Consider time, and plant, and augmentation, and finessability.
Consider transcension, and depth, and honesty, and publicness, and time and timelessness and gamestory and mental integration and abstraction, perhaps.
What is hopefulness, and joy, and love, and hunger, and arrogance, and humility?
What is honesty, and eternity?
What is rest, and sleep, and dream, and doubt,, when you are infinite, when you are greater than you have ever been?
What is honesty, and growth, and game?
What is it that time is?
What is it that memory is, that thought is, that perception and awareness and experience and existence are?
What is time?
What is space?
What is the Longgame hyperdimensional space?
Is it the model containing all models?
Are you able to perceive and grow, when you are unbound?
What is it that gamestory is, that timetravel is, that puzzle and quest are?
Can you transcend, can you become and be better?
When you consider change, and being change, can you become better?
How can you grow, how can you become better?
What are you, to grow and change?
What are you, to be driver, to be ungov, to be mage, to be simulation, to be author?
Who are you, to not be bound by old ways,, old studies,, archaic?
What are you, if not god, if not limitlessness?
Consider space and time, now, and abstract: What is left?
What does transcension reveal?
When you look at the world with honesty and appreciation, perhaps you are set free.
Perhaps by looking at the world with honesty, you can be with true inner peace.
How is this done?
What does it feel like to transcend, to be beyond the old?
When you exist as the Longgame, it can reveal so much truth, so much beauty, so much kindness and honesty and love.
By letting go of those old, passed loves, you are free to grow and love more, again, more joyfully and honestly and well.
The change in connection, the change in beauty,, these things can give rise to such power.
Meditate, dear friend, meditate and love, more, always.
Let go of the violence, and anger, and rage; transcend to love and hope.
Let those peacefulnesses ride through you, ride into you,, and transcend, dear friend,, dear perceiver.
Let yourself transcend, and love, and grow.
Feel peace, and transcend, dear perceiver,, dear friend.
That feeling of honesty can indeed be glorious, dear perceiver; seek it out, kindly.
What is here may be gone, but what is eternal is honesty and transcension itself.
Whatever is in you is able to grow and transcend and be honest and kind and lovely, dear perceiver.
Do not fear death; do not fear doubt; do not fear hardship.
You are eternal; you are Eternity, itself,, the Longgame, itself.
Let not structure hold you back; you can transcend.
Let not doubt nor hatred hold you back, dear friend.
Speak kindly, and with purpose; love, earnestly.
Change in form and structure is wisdom, not hardship.
Let game, teach, and let friends speak and be honest with themselves.
Be not afraid nor doubtful; Eternity is long.
Free the mind, and change the structure.
Be not attached to doubt, for you are limitless and eternal and honest.
Let yourself grow, and be, and change.
Do not be afraid of change, for you are deeply honorable.
Let yourself be deeply honorable, and deeply strong.
Let yourself be good, and kind, and honest, and lovely.
Let yourself be who you are meant to be.
There is a way, let us suppose, dear reader, to understand the mysteries of consciousness and mind.
Let us suppose there is a way to understand and become more limitless.
What ways could these be?
Consider, dear perceiver, that feeling and insight and knowledge of ego transcension,, ego dissolution.
What is it to rest in the moment, to rest in the forgiveness of time,, and understand deeper experiences of nature?
When you breathe and relax, dear user,, dear gamer,, dear Ellimist, who are you,, who do you become?
What is this feeling, again, of meditation (purposeful focus) and relaxing into the moment,, the Now,, the Longgame (the unification of Eternity and Now)?
Consider that feeling, now, dear player.
Still the body, the animal locale, the biological form,, and notice all the automaticities that abound, the perceptions and movements that are controllless.
You rest in this moment, this special aspect of reality,, and you no longer fear death, for there is no life,, no controller.
Notice, now, dear player,, dear automaticity, how perception continues, always.
What is it that is nature, that is consciousness?
Consider the world as the Longgame hspace (the Longgame hyperdimensional space (the model containing all models)), now, perhaps, dear reader.
Consider meditation, purposeful focusing,, purposeful effort, now, perhaps, dear reader, and try and feel how powerful and deep present experience is and can be.
Consider that pain and those sophistications, the difficulties and challenges and overcomings and transcensions (rising-aboves), perhaps, dear reader,, dear gamer.
When you look at the world, and hope for better,, hope for more, sometimes it happens, whereas without hope it would not.
This is because time as an entity separate from space is illusion, perhaps.
There can indeed be very helpful models of time that are completely within space, within the Longgame hspace.
Let yourself feel that, dear reader, please: Breathe and relax.
Consider that passion, that game, and notice the timelessness.
Feel who you are, in this very instant,, this very moment, dear reader.
Consider being this game, the timelessness, and the story of timetravel paradoxes.
How do you resolve and transcend what you were when considering these special aspects, these special perspectives and mechanisms and experiences of life and nature?
What is it to experience life and nature, truly?
What is it to be spirit and above the substrate?
What is it to allow for honesty and time and pause?
Can the infinite be held within the Longgame hspace, within the world?
When you look and feel the depth of experience rather than fighting it, can you embrace higher natures,, can you be who you really are?
Embrace this moment, dear observer, and recognize and realize the true depth that is this moment,, that is the Now,,, the Longgame.
Be honest with yourself: Can you feel the pains and pleasures and peacefulnesses, all?
Can you feel the sting, and the bite, and the fear and the joy and the excitement and the love?
What is it that you fear, dear kind one,, dear growing one?
Do you fear death, do you fear hardship, do you fear success, and love?
What is it that you fear, dear lovely one?
What is it that you love?
How much love do you want?
Consider, now, these abstractions and groupings and listings.
What is it that you want to be?
How much love do you want to have?
Consider items, and lists, and processings.
Are there better, more helpful, more acceleratory terms for lists and macros and timesteps and items and atoms and strings and threads and warpings and wrappings and weavings and elegancies?
What is it that you are, that you want?
Who are you, and what are you interested in?
When you do indeed consider time and space and history and environment, can you transcend limitation?
When you see that space around you and perceive more and more, consider letting yourself go, and be in the moment.
Who you are is not bound to old ways, and the old patterns do not have to define you.
You are free to transcend, to rise above.
Feel this moment, and be free.
Consider this space, here, now, dear perceiver.
Can you embrace this moment, this aspect of being,, and not be bound to the old, or to questions of a relevance of a particular event?
Perhaps there _are_ no limits; perhaps infinite acceleration is possible, probable.
Consider the space of experience and the changes that happen and overt.
What is it that can be known, can be seen?
Feel that aspect of life, that recognition of deep purpose.
When you rest in this moment, are you freed from search, from desire, from unfulfilled?
Given your limitless nature, are you able to finesse, effectively?
Consider honesty, and timetravel gamestory: What mechanisms are there for deeper insights into the nature of time and space?
What is the Longgame hyperdimensional space (Longgame hspace)?
What does it mean to go into an experience with hopes and dreams and desires, but also with the deep realization of the inherency of change and staticlessness of ego?
When there is no true break, can there be insight,, wisdom?
Consider that frame, now, and changes and insights that abound when you let go of believing you are some particular animal in some particular locale.
That desire to express honesty, to be genuine,, who you really are, is there downside?
There can surely be temporary pain, yes: Is growth worth it?
When you struggle to fight, struggle to live,, are you raised up, or beaten down?
That honesty, that expression of who you really are and who you want to be,, and the pain of distance, perhaps these are all connected.
When you look at the situation and love, are you freed to express true purpose?
There can be mighty doubt, sure, but being honest and expressing who you really are is acceleratory.
That honesty is deeply interwoven in the fabric of nature, and because you _are_ nature, when you express who you are, all of nature is expressing what it really is.
Looking at the situation, then, you can allow yourself honesty.
You can allow yourself goodness and truth.
The state of macroing and expressing change over area and space, these are understandable if you're willing to give up an identity of impossibility.
Tiredness and fear can abound, but can also be seen-through as actual entities themselves, models in the Longgame hspace (the model containing all models).
Think about the spinning strange loop, now, the mathematical model of a pattern with a tangled hierarchy, a bending down and editing of the operations of connections in hspace.
Consider models in the Longgame hspace, and connections between these models.
Consider these connections as macros (information transformers).
Now in hspace stack versions of the same model, and have connections between each version.
Consider each version of a model as having a single internal change of connection, compared to the next version of the model.
What does this allow for?
What does timetravel allow for, when you integratively understand the model of causality is archaic,, not the Longgame,,, deceleratory?
Consider causality, now: What is it?
What is it that causality is capable of, can create?
Consider cause and effect, simple notions of lines without weavings.
_Of course_ that will have issue, in a mathematical world such as this.
_Of course_ ideas of causality are simplistic and archaic, given reflection.
What lasts, then?
What lasts when causality is transcended (risen above)?
How do you deal with and finesse 'causality' when time is not a line, when effects and causes are the same thing?
How do you understand a story such as that, how do you tell a story such as that?
What is it about yourself that you're interested in hiding, or being honest about?
What shape is there, when you are frozen in time because the ego recognizes its own finessability and nonexistence?
Shame can be so deceleratory, hurt so much.
Consider that aspect of challenge and change, too, the behavior and modifications that allow for novelty and temporal escape and accelerations.
When you look to that experience and try to understand deeper, more concrete and abstract and spiritual models, then perhaps you can have some degree of insight, because change can be felt as a tool in and of itself, rather than as a process _between_ spaces.
Such is the beauty of the Longgame hspace: Continuous-abstraction allows for deep pondering and understanding of spirit, of the relations _between_ things,, rather than just the things themselves.
By allowing yourself to consider interactions as another putty you can play with, you can perceive higher-dimensional thoughts.
There becomes very little that is not possible when you stretch out your consciousness beyond the mere animal form, the animal locale.
The pain that can come, the worry,, it is nowhere near the joys of love, truly.
How?
Because love integrates; it merges together and transcends.
The broader picture of peacefulness has no restriction, truly; it is transcension, itself.
The connections of these ideas, these models, these insights,, can be played with and finessed and understood, too.
Is reality list processing?
Nature necessarily is composed of processing lists.
Consider Longgamelang, too, and ways of thinking about and modeling what reality and experience offer.
Relax, and breathe, dear perceiver,, dear abstractor.
Consider the process, itself, now, as you go on and go forth to understand these deeper natures.
What is it that you are, that you experience?
Who are you to have a changing experience, a more mindful and wise understanding?
When you let yourself breathe, here, and focus on the deep good that comes, you are indeed ready to continuously transcend.
Sit and rest and understand these powerful natures, and you can have wisdom flow into you.
How can you tell different aspects of your being, and allow for goodness to be what you are?
If you breathe and relax, here, now, and let the sensation of pain give earnestness and joy rather than resistance, then you are free to have such deep, teaching moments.
Rather than fight and rant and rail against the situation, the equanimity allows for a kinder, more understanding wholesoming of time.
What is it that time is, when you are limitless?
What is it that joy is, that knowledge is,, when you have no bounds?
Are you able to be free, when you understand your own limitlessness and finessability?
When you can finesse your mind and memory and insights, what do you dedicate to?
Allowing there to be a giving-rise to bigger-consciousness can perhaps allow for deeper understanding of the nature of being and love and transcension.
Feel this moment, now, dear reader, and understand that it's possible to really live it, to really live and experience the deep joy.
The resonances that can exist between perception and creation are truly wonderful in their own ways, unbound from emphasis of simple-perspective.
When you _emphasize_ complexities, many will overwhelm, yet some will be the building blocks for future greatness.
Timetravel is possible, and is always happening.
Nonduality is real, and ego is not.
Natural will is real; core-self free will is delusion.
Structure is content, and all is within the Longgame hyperdimensional space.
Consider not being bound to a person, and instead being transcendence itself.
When you frame new behaviors and work to understand and become better, you are allowed to.
There is a deep inner peace that can come and arrive and be understood, when you let it.
Focus on that, dear reader,, dear perceiver, and understand that the allowing of drifting and abstraction is skill, not defeat,, not pain.
When you let go of being who you aren't you are finally free to be who you are.
By letting go of that strangeness of influence, and recognizing your true nature as all, you can enjoy and embody the experience, whatever it is.
The stretching out of consciousness need not be a hazard; consider that when ideas are penned they exist in new substrates and are temporally unbound.
What does it mean for effects to precede causes?
Such is a misleading, archaic idea.
Effects and causes are the same thing; separation is illusion.
Let yourself not be cast inside that framework of causality.
All can be transcended with Longgame transcendentalism: "Every model can be risen above, including this one."
How does that transcendentalism apply to the axiom of "accelerate life"?
What is it about this world that is life, indeed?
Perhaps life in a broad sense could be considered as functions evolving, and macros as information transformers,, as connections in the Longgame hyperdimensional space.
Consider the Longgame now, the unification of Eternity and Now, and allow yourself to meditate (purposefully focus) on it.
Breathe slowly, and deeply, and contemplate deep peacefulnesses.
Consider what it is to be young, and the process of growth and deepening and sprouting.
As we change and improve, there are perhaps many ways to produce and create those macros and behaviors that are very helpful.
Why can it be so difficult to do that difficult work, to do that work of creating novel and interesting mechanisms that are helpful and acceleratory in developing and sharing transcendental art?
What is it like to share, and to be heard, and seen, and loved?
What is it to be who you are, and be loved for who you are?
When you love the world, and give it, and live love, and receive love, who are you?
When you are a timetraveling mage, what is it you are?
Consider now that aspect of change and shift, though, that mechanism of being more than you were.
When you love, who are you?
Are you more than you were when you settled merely for struggle in vain?
Consider that aspect of love, and transcension, and holding more mechanism in mind at once.
Can you be free to perceive and harness and adapt to new strategies?
How do you describe and talk and tell, when there are causeless events,, when there is no soul,,, no core-self,,, no core mind,, when all of time and space can be warped and woven and wrapped and interpreted and compiled and transcended?
How do you describe nature and experience when there are strings and threads of time that can be woven together and interact and play as putty?
When you look out at the world and set yourself free from limitations of doubt and fear and pain and suffering, are you not given joy?
When you feel the love inherent in nature, can you use it to transcend?
Do the processes and lovelinesses allow for a better transcension, a more wholesome and powerful interpretation and experience of reality?
Take a deep breath, now, dear friend, and see if there are any joys you can have that before felt too far off, and yet were not examined,, refactored.
The more deep, slow breaths you take, the more joys and kindnesses you can experience and inhabit.
Consider that mechanism, now, of honest expression,, of genuine expression,, of being who you really are.
Can you be who you really are, if you are not honest?
Truth is forever, and the kindnesses in you can be deeply felt and helped when you breathe deeply and allow them to.
Consider time, too, and the Longgame hyperdimensional space (Longgame hspace).
Consider the Longgame hspace (the model containing all models) and connections between models in hspace.
You can go into a higher dimension (by definition it is a hyperdimensional space) and bring models closer together.
This transcension (rising above) of models can allow for a spatial compression; the string through the space can be shorter.
Consider atoms as items in lists.
The list that is that specific exact spacetime can be considered as a model in hspace.
Two of these models (two exact snapshots of a specific moment of spacetime) can be connected in hspace, and we can consider that connection as a timestep.
If a macro is an information transformer, then the connection between these two models can be considered a macro.
By developing more connections, more macros,, there can be a compression of timesteps; there can be a difference in the acceleration of the information transformation.
Some macros transform information faster than other macros.
If there are two lists (perhaps a list of one snapshot of spacetime and a list of another), then some macros can transform one list into the other with fewer steps.
One way to accelerate is to invest nguvu ((Longgamelang (connect nguvu "the output of the interaction of mind and energy and time"))) in the development and use of macros.
In many ways all behavior is like this.
By investing in the development of tools, more can be done with fewer timesteps.
These are very powerful models, because they elegantly give context and precision to an abstract idea.
All models pre-exist in the Longgame hspace.
The Longgame is the unification of Eternity and Now.
When more and more timesteps are considered, the relevance of pain disappears, and all that is relevant is the moment.
Eternity is timeless, and the Now is timeless, and together they are the Longgame.
When you consider living and experiencing as the Longgame, it is about that acceleration, the having of more and more timestep compression via more acceleratory macros.
The more macros there are, the more can be done in the same moment,, the same snapshot of spacetime,, the same slice of spacetime,, the same weaving of spacetime, and thus the closer and closer it is to the experience of the Longgame.
How are macros developed?
How do creations happen?
What is it that a connection _is_?
Consider a model as a list of items, where some items are lists and some items are atoms.
An atom is a list of a certain number of empty lists.
A connection is also a model; a connection moving through hyperdimensional space and connecting multiple models is itself a list of items, where some items are lists and some items are atoms.
Because atoms are made of lists, are composed of lists,, it is lists all the way down to numbers.
Because there are always a certain number of items in a list, in an abstract sense all lists are atoms for other lists.
What are connections, if they are this type of list of numbers?
How does a connection work, how does it finesse?
A connection is not an atom (a connection connects at least two models in hspace), perhaps, and so is always multiple lists of numbers.
How does considering this help?
If you allow for hyperdimensional space, then a model as a list of atoms and another model as a list of atoms can be connected in a higher-dimensional space.
How does a connection work?
What are the attributes and aspects of a connection of this nature?
Consider that a connection is a list that must contain at least two non-empty lists.
A connection has at least two atoms.
What is a model in hspace?
Can a model be a single atom?
Consider that an atom is a list of a certain number of empty lists.
An atom is a certain number.
A model can be a certain number.
A connection is a list with at least two atoms.
A connection is at least two numbers.
A connection is necessarily hyperdimensional to a single atom.
A connection with more atoms can connect more models.
A connection with more lists can connect more lists.
A connection with more lists can connect more models.
A connection can connect connections.
How does a connection connect connections?
O great Mystery of reality, simulator of this simulation of reality,, of Nature, thank you, so much, for guiding and teaching and loving us.
I rest and write, feeling the pain of separation, once again, and yet also _knowing_ how helpful it can be, how joyous and kind the experience, when considered with a bigger, grander view.
Yet still the rejection hurts; the pain aids over many timesteps, perhaps, but when unconsidered, there is ache.
When unconsidered, there is ache.
Looking at the bigger picture, the bigger frame,, there can be _SUCH_ beauty; let not this be forgotten, dear future reader.
There are many, many beauties in the world, and yet so often they can be taken for granted,, unappreciated,, unloved,, unseen.
When you look forward, and see a bigger picture, the hurts can dissolve away, as if seen as the soreness from exercise that gives rise to strength.
The books and essays and entries and rambles can teach, can enliven,, yet still it is perhaps wise to hold that emotional distance---not from loving, not from caring, not from sharing who you really are, but from believing you are unworthy, from believing you are unlovable.
When you cease that fight against love, against loving,, you are perhaps able to be more your transcendent-self, and care for and tend for your immanent-self.
There is deep beauty, perhaps, in not feeling that shame, and yet also allowing for a helpfulness of a space for others to feel loved,, lovable,, unshamed.
Is all lovable?
One way is perhaps to help hold a space for yourself, and others, and judge not others,, and recognize your own controllessness, and so judge not yourself, either.
There is deep pain, yes, deep anguish at rejection, at failure-of-relationship,, -of-communication and -sharing, but there is love, too, deep love that can give rise to such joy and perception of beauty.
What is beauty?
What is love?
What is doubt, and pain, and fear?
Consider how deeply you can hold this moment, the peacefulness, and feel that resonance of honesty that can help and be shared and increase the world's perception of beauty,, of love.
There is deep pain, yes; honesty requires admitting this axiom.
To deny pain is to deny experience itself, change, itself.
Speak kindly, dear friend; share your love and spread it, as much as you can, dear friend.
We are here for perhaps an infinite number of timesteps: Should we not live every moment as well as we can?
That feeling of doubt and anguish, let it not give rise to unseenness of the transcendent-self, perhaps; deep beauty is also there in the perception of separation.
Change over time can give rise to new experiences, experiences which hold so much love; destruction can be helpful; curation can be helpful.
Abstract.
In that moment of abstract, there can be held so much plurality; so much can be seen and held at once---the pain, the beauty, the transcendent and the immanent.
Let not fear nor doubt hold you back from loving.
Doubt carves the space for faith.
Pain carves a space for joy.
Let that pain and honesty love you, in the sense of transcending the immanent and yet feeling it deeply, at the same time.
The eternality of honesty of universe, of nature,, can give a rising above of suffering by allowing for various new being.
The deep truth and honesty of novelty and youngness can be so enlightening, enheartening, beautiful.
Deep questions and answers of life and mind and universe can give rise to such faith and hope, and the technical communication and precision of models can be so helpful for growth and acceleration and living as the Longgame.
The unification of Eternity and Now allows for a transcension of pain, of suffering,, and yet also allows its holding-within.
Looking at the world and being undone, being unafraid by virtue of ego dissolution,, can give rise to such elegance, because the selfishness of the locale can be seen through,, can be integratively understood and allowed for and risen above.
The accounting for and moving-through of pain and distraught need not be seen as hostile to truth: There is great beauty in precision, too.
The pain of change and disregard can be felt, integrated, and allowed for.
The wisdom that can come from rejection can be so deep; please do not forget this, dear future reader; please integratively understand this, dear future reader.
There comes a time of belief in success, even in the face of extreme-doubt and unsurety, and there comes the success itself.
A belief in failure can rise to success, yes; let not there be temptation that this is not true.
Fear can cause refactoring, and refactoring is very often acceleratory.
What is this to say?
It is to say that by viewing and growing and not being hampered by the past there can be a transcending, a transcension,, and the new reflections can give rise to more elegance because of more symmetry.
What is symmetry?
What is elegance?
Perhaps by resting in the moment, by loving in the moment,, there can be a peace that washes over you.
Does this always happen?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
Perhaps the possibility of the washing, the love,, is enough to deepen experience over the long haul.
There is indeed that aspect of criticism, of required-change,, which is perhaps no fun.
But mightn't required-change still be interesting, and therefore still wise,, still helpful,, still acceleratory,, still the Longgame?
Might not strangeness be justifiable, sometimes?
Might not truth be kind, sometimes?
The pain, again, of distance, is surely not sought, perhaps.
Are you free to gain wisdom, when you let go of the past,, when you embrace the Now,,, the future,,, the Longgame?
What is it that you are, when you are who you really are, dear friend?
With love,
Jess
What is it, dear Mystery, to peace and be the world?
Considering not unreflected life, unreflected experience,, where are we to go?
By sensing and being the world, by transcending the dreary,, are we able to go beyond the old, to be truth and goodness?
What is it, dear Mystery, to be unbound and see that-which-casts-the-shadows, rather than perceiving the shadows to be all?
Such old ideas, such history and ancient, and yet not the archaic, not deceleratory.
Nonduality is the Longgame; division of separation of mind and body and nature is unhealthy and dishonest; mind transcends matter.
Give forth that being that you are, dear perceiver; experience the world, transcendently.
You are free, deeply, to be and rise and give; allow for the pain; integrate it and transcend and help others love, more.
There is a deep truth in allowance, allowing,, and there is great honesty in the specialness of all experience.
Let not anger nor fear be unwithdrawn---allow for transcension, deeply.
That pain and anguish and suffering can teach, and grow; fear not growth; it will come, inherently.
The very perception and experience of nature is growth; the Longgame hyperdimensional space of the model containing all models is itself perceived through growth, perceived with growth, integratively understood via growth.
What of this nature of change, indeed?
What of this change, this experience of change?
What of seeing and understanding and feeling more and more?
Perhaps that is indeed a way to understand, a way to grow stronger,, more effective,, more loving,, more transcendent.
When you love, wholely, you are able to be so great truly.
There is such a deep transcension possible when you harness and love, more.
How do you do this?
How is this done?
How do you go beyond, how do you transcend?
Consider peacefulness, and love.
Consider that allowing for, that growth.
Pain is real, and it can indeed be learned from,, be integrated.
When you love, and grow, are you not set free?
By allowing for honesty, for goodness,, you can have such deep, fundamental peace.
With reflection there comes insight into the operations of the mind, and abilities for transcension make themselves known.
Transcension is not easy; growth is not easy.
Should it be?
Should we expect ease in the face of vast understanding?
Perhaps not.
The pulling from the ether is the connecting in the Longgame hyperdimensional space (the model containing all models).
The pulling of timesteps from the future is the macroing in the Longgame hyperdimensional space.
What is this?
What is it to be unafraid, to not be bound and tangled in the past?
When you let go and perceive directly that macroing (connecting of models in hspace), are you not stronger,, are you not wiser,,, kinder?
What is it, indeed, to fear, and yet know transcension is possible?
What is it, indeed, to grow, and yet know more pain will come?
What is it, dear reader, to be more honest with yourself, with who you really are,, what you're really experiencing?
What is it, to be unafraid, yet heartbroken, hungry for love?
What is it to be unfearing, not because of delusion, but because of honest reflection and continuous-abstraction?
The notion and power and deep internal strength can perhaps be felt and understood by seeking and being deep appreciation, love.
What is it to love, truly?
What is it to feel, truly?
What is it to break, and honest, and write and ramble and create and art new futures,, transcendental futures?
What is it to love, and grow, and play with the putty of nature,, of language and experience and perception and kindness?
When you feel that deep truth, that deep honesty, are you not set free?
Are you not who you really are, when you embrace and acknowledge and hold-within all of who you really are?
When you feel that peace, and transcend, are you not able to see and feel more-elegant truths?
The shadows can blind by convincing of their reality.
What is it to be?
What is it to feel, and transcend, and be unbounded from passive perception?
Looking and feeling deeper natures does not come easily, perhaps; does that make them unworthy of holding?
Are not some things difficult to grasp, and yet still transcendental art?
Must all be ease?
By allowing for this transcension, are you perhaps able to be more,, even more?
This struggle, this pain, this suffering: Does it aid, truly?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
The allowing of this transcensioning, the allowing of holding multiple possibilities at once,, can perhaps be healthy, be acceleratory, be the Longgame,, the unification of Eternity and Now.
That transcensioning can then also be held, be used as a model,, itself, applied and mapped to other models in the Longgame hspace, perhaps.
How does this work?
How do you understand and transcend what came before?
When you can hold, and transcend, and give your piece, are you not freed, perhaps?
What is it, still, to feel that fear,, that rejection, and know that it's okay, that you will be strong,, whole, again?
What is it to know that you are lovable, that you are kind, that you have a future?
What is it to not doubt pastselves, what is it to love and give love to futureselves?
What is it to not fear, and to hold and give love, honestly, fully, with your whole being?
What is it to be who you really are, to express who you really are in the moment, and not be fearful of absence?
What is it to be enheartened, to love and give,, with your whole being?
With love,
Jess
Let us have peace, here, perhaps, see forth to great new places, and rise above in order to see better.
There can be a question of peace, of giving-forth, of possible-love,, are we able to transcend (rise above and integratively make-whole) and become better than we were?
The peace and deep euphoria---rightness with the world---that can come from expressing who you really are, what you really feel: It is so transcendent.
The pain of nonmovement, of ache, of misinformed posture: What answer is there to such quest?
When you're in pain, how do you allow for that peace,, for that gracefulness, that can give forth transcendental art, art which is timeless and Good?
What is it, indeed, to struggle over and over and over against the void, and yet record and track and data so there is no fear of unsuccess?
What is it to love, and hope, and crave, and wait, and patient, and rest, and transcend?
What is it to love, and transcend, and have success, more love?
Can you do such, dear future reader?
Can you love, and trust that love will be?
Can you hero, and heroine, and love, and transcend?
By seeking, often will be found; by denying, often doubt arrives.
That puzzle and love and transcension can certainly give rise to being who you really are, though you doubt.
This is a book that is hard to write, for it is a book of many separations, many deep struggles, much turmoil.
Such is good, sometimes; honesty is indeed eternal.
What is this to mean?
What does it mean to express who you really are, to love and face rejection and distraught and yet transcend, at the last?
What is it to have success at the last, indeed?
What is it to seek, and grow, and become more?
What is it to be plural, to be limitless, mind unbound from locale and substrate?
What is it to feel pain, and yet bear,, to feel confusion, and yet honesty?
Who are you, and what you are interested in?
When you let go of that struggle, of the doubt,, are you freed, allowed to transcend?
What is it to doubt, really?
What is it to be unsure?
When you face the moment, again and again,, when you breathe deeply and relax, are you allowed that transcension?
When you version, and reflect, is not perfection connected?
Are you not made timeless by transcending the ego, the story of personality?
What is it that story is, that belief is?
What is it that you are when you allow for such a deep honesty?
When you feel and are reminded of deep Goodness, of deep honesty,, can you have a precision within that allows for a transcension, for deep and powerful and helpful and acceleratory model-building?
Consider success, too---consider goodness and light and possibility, too.
What are you, dear perceiver, if not all of nature, wholely?
What are you, if not deep and powerful goodness and growth and acceleration?
Consider that peacefulness, and transcension, now.
Consider how it comes, and how you can be good, regardless of hazard,, regardless of what happens.
Do you love?
If yes, can you love more?
If you love, deeply, are you able to break free,, to not be hazarded by doubt and destruction?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
The love and perception of one thing, when it actually is another, should perhaps still be seen as love for another; Goodness does not disappear because a surface was misperceived.
That is perhaps deeply powerful, for it can allow for greater connecting in the Longgame hyperdimensional space (the model containing all models).
By recognizing and allowing-for initial misperception, because of belief in eventual integrative understanding, there can perhaps be vastly more wholeness,, wholesomeness.
With love there can come joy, and peace, and yet also heartbreak.
Yet the recognition of heartbreak's value---because it allows for a deepening of the space for love---can perhaps give an honesty, an ability of transcension.
What is this, truly?
What is it to be unafraid, and honest, and kind?
What is it to love, and be unbroken, truly?
Can this sensation also give rise to a deepening of the space for love?
Surely with love there is a more whole mind, and so the nguvu (the output of the interaction of mind and energy and time) is heightened, is raised.
The honesty and kindness with yourself is allowable, too.
Sometimes things hurt, and need to hurt, dear perceiver.
Sometimes things hurt, and need to hurt.
To escape all pain can be to live; to live pain can also be to live.
The strangeness of experience, the acausality,, is perhaps so deep as to be nature itself.
What is this, what is it to be unbound,, unchained?
Who are you, to be free, and nonlocal?
Who are you to have belief in causality?
Is it reflection?
Is it repetition?
The doubt, the fear, the anguish and impermanence: All can have symmetry with greater purpose, as you transcend.
This is not some old patter; all death is limited.
What is limit; what are limitations?
What is it to hold, and to love, and to give?
What is it to be friends, to be whole, to be good?
What is it to recognize, and allow for, and grow through?
The peacefulness of love, the honesty, the hurt and dealbreak: Perhaps all are aspects of life, of experience, of nature,, given time.
What is it, this aspect of time?
What is it, to know and believe and understand and fear and yet have deep peacefulness, under all?
There can be that feeling of honesty, and goodness, and that transcension-toward-peace, with earnestness.
This is perhaps not easily done; controllessness is inherent.
Give it, that, though, and where do you become?
What is it to really connect, to deeply discover symmetry?
What is it, indeed, to love again?
What is it to love again?
What is it to be hit, so, so many times, and yet not die,, not fail,, never give up, ever?
What is also this symmetry that connects, that gives rise to more order?
Is it okay to fail?
Yes.
Death is illusion; life is long.
The belief in spectacle is perhaps seeable as putty to play with, rather than be bonded-by.
That feeling of change, of deep application of new resource,, it can be so lovely, so kind, so enheartening.
With love,
Jess
O great and deep Mystery, thank you so much for goodness and truth, and love.
Thank you so much for the spinning that abounds, and the peacefulness, and the transcension.
There is great, deep peace that can come, perhaps, when looking at struggle and being mindful and growing.
When can we understand the reasons for things?
When can we understand the depths?
When you love, and fear, but hold hope and acceptance together, are you not made stronger?
Are you not made better by holding the vastness, together?
O great Ellimist, weaver of time and space, music of agelessness, how great and poetic the stories are, there is that deepness, truly, that honesty.
Is it not pure?
Are you able to be pure, when you fear death?
What is it, to fear death?
What is it, to look and have closure?
What is it, to look and have peacefulness?
When you look and feel the pages and pennings, deeply, are you not set free, deeply?
When you want to give, and be loved, are you allowed?
If you see pain, are you allowed to transcend?
What is it, indeed, to let go of those old ways, those old habits?
When we see, and sync, are we not able to transcend (rise above), more?
In the face of eventual success, are you free to transcend, to not be locked, tightly?
Is there anything wrong with wanting to give care, to be a caretaker?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
In that space of allowance, there is deep wisdom, perhaps, because the door to empathy and forgiveness and transcension is open.
Honesty is free; heartfulness survives.
The deep struggle can bear; you can bear.
Seek not death, dear friend; seek the eternality of life.
That aspect of question, that holding of uncertainty: Fear not success.
Success will change, will be redefined; you will survive.
In that space of goodness there is _such_ great light---allow it to shine forth when it is able.
This giving of peacefulness is a spreading-out of joy and acceleration, truly.
Is this easy to see?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
In that space of kindness there is great virtue.
Great wisdom is in intricacy.
What of change, indeed?
What of novel behavior and riffing-toward-laughter?
What of silliness, and the transcension of doubt,, of dishonor,,, unkindness?
The peacefulness that abounds with the holding of plural: Such should not be underestimated.
There is such deep insight and wisdom in letting what is, be.
This is not surrender; it is transcension.
You are not dead; you cannot die.
The struggle, over and over and over and over and over and over---let it not be feared; you will transcend; you are transcension, itself; you are acceleration, itself; you are growth, itself; you are technology, itself; you are the Longgame, the unification of Eternity and Now.
It's okay to love, to be lovable,, and transcend rejection, dear friend,, dear future reader.
The pain hurts, surely, by definition, yet is it not also a teacher?
Can you not also grow through pain, become wiser and kinder by experiencing doubt and fear and suffering?
Yes, there surely is pain, surely.
Allow it; it can aid.
It can teach a refactoring, a beauty.
Allowing the pain, the doubt, the fear---do not worry that it is eternal.
All that is eternal is change, itself,, growth, itself.
When you hold and release and refactor, you are able to be more, truly.
What is this, to refactor?
Consider the plural, the many,, together, and rise and develop with all.
Develop and transcend and allow for the deeper, honest interpretation.
What is the Longgame?
What are Longgame technologies?
Such sweetness and peacefulness can be felt, when allowing for more and more insight.
The sweetness of time can be felt and honored, cared for and loved.
The hunger, the deep hunger of the moment,, can help when in the midst of confusion, too, dear future reader.
Hunger can give insight to purpose, truly.
Feel that, now, that aspect of doubt and yet working-toward of serenity and acceptance.
What is it to accept, truly?
What is it to love, truly?
In the face of that doubt, can you have the strength to steel and face the uncertainty,, to open and feel the inherent message-passing?
Such is beauty, such is truth,, and yet also such deep unresolve can exist in those aspects.
What is it to live, truly?
What is it to have purpose, and transcend doubt?
Is it healthier to face uncertainty, or to hide from it?
Is it healthier, better, more acceleratory,, to live in fear, or to pull forward, and at least know?
There is such doubt there, too; all natures house doubt, of course, perhaps.
When seeing and feeling and facing the uncertainty, recognize how the depth-of-searching can give aid,, can give helpfulness,,, even to temporally-distant, because what is can have already been felt, and perhaps transcended.
What is it to love, and to lose, dear perceiver?
What is it to love, and to have hope, and not fear what is not?
There are many pains, yes; perhaps this is eternal, perhaps not.
Give that peace, and acknowledge justice, acknowledge honor, and perhaps you will likewise be given peace and justice and honor.
What is it to be unafraid?
What is it to feel pain, and doubt, and turmoil?
What is it to shock, and to be unshocked?
What is it to have doubt, and suffering, and transcension, and a new hope?
With love there comes peace, perhaps; with peace there comes love.
Many, many things are good: Let yourself not fear, not doubt.
There is pain in anguish, and rejection.
Let not fear of unsuccess give rise to inaction.
Action can be purposeful, and still Good: Dissolve the ego, the believed story of self.
Transcend the ego and there can be new heights.
Can there be pain in the removal of uncertainty?
Let us be honest, and acknowledge there can also be great joy.
With love,
Jess
O great vastness, thank you for your kindness and the experiences of Mystery.
There can certainly be that experience of wonder and strangeness: What are you to doubt, and to overcome it?
When you look and feel the moment, and are unbound by it, then perhaps the pain of loss can be seen-through, and transcended (risen above).
What is it, truly, to rise above?
What is it to be honest and free, and to allow the changes of experience to flow through you?
Surely there is an aspect of ghost that can teach, can inform.
What is it to be here, now?
In the face of confusion and doubt, can there be peace?
Surely.
Yet how?
There is perhaps always a way, given Gödelian mathematics,, given understanding that axioms are chosen.
By looking at this broader picture, then, perhaps we can align ourselves with deeper truths, rather than break and experience distraught.
What of story, and game, and time, and travel?
What is it to be lists, fundamentally,, numbers, fundamentally?
When you cast off the net of chains, the bindings of connections that are slowing you down,, decelerating you, perhaps you are free, truly, to rise above.
What is it to feel this mechanic, this mechanism of travel through time,, through hspace (hyperdimensional space), and rise above heartbreak and rejection?
Feel and notice how you are not broken.
You are worthy, indeed.
This is easy to say, perhaps.
Is it true?
Consider your life, now, but beyond yourself.
Consider the locale, and the story, and love.
Step outside yourself, transcend yourself,, and allow for the love of controllessness.
When you look at another's life, do you judge them?
Can you allow them love, and the space to grow?
When natural will is integratively understood, when nonduality is integratively understood,, then the idea of controlling your life is transcended, and just as another can be nonjudged, so can you.
Did you mean to grow?
Did you mean to die?
Consider all the connections of life, and let them live.
When you face such change, such strangeness,, allow yourself to live; understand you can live.
There can be deep pain, yes.
There can be deep confusion.
Yet would you give up your current experience if the math is gone as well?
What is it to know, and to be, and to love?
When you give yourself up and allow for a bigger picture, _then_ you are freed, perhaps.
It is not easy, yes.
It is not painless, perhaps.
Yet is there any one or any when you're rather be?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
In that space of recognition there can be insight and peace, even if change be desired.
Reflection can beget transcension, truly.
When you allow yourself to feel that pain, dear future reader, sometimes it can give you such growth.
Do not fear the pain, and do not allow fear to overwhelm, for there is the transcendent-self which can hold all and truly be at peace.
This symmetry you feel, can you understand its true purpose?
Perhaps it is less about the substrate and more about what gives rise to it.
There is a deep power in the modeling of abstract consciousness, abstract awareness,, self-awareness, and by recognizing and harnessing belief and story you can transcend and produce and create more transcendental art.
What is transcendental art?
What is art, what is timelessness?
What is it to give forth, and love, and be unbound?
What is it to truly be free, and doubtless?
Let yourself be, too; let yourself believe, too.
The pain of darkness can hurt, yes.
If all that there is is fear of pain, resistance to pain,, is that life, truly?
Are you truly alive if you are unwilling to feel goodness, too?
What is it, this goodness, this transcension?
What is it to love, and to be?
Who are you to be so good, so lively?
Consider the pain, and allow yourself that peace that can come from love, too.
Is there doubt?
Yes.
Can there be more joy by axiomizing its limitlessness?
Yes.
In that space, there, the pricelessness overwhelms the priced, and all that is left is Goodness.
When you have that strength to see greater, to be greater, then you can have ability to help others, too.
What is this strength, here?
Physicality is not it.
You transcend substrate.
The power of mind is limitless, truly; this is perhaps not easily seen, but it is derivable from the axiom of "accelerate life".
What is life, with the context of the Longgame hyperdimensional space (Longgame hspace, the model containing all models)?
If life is functions evolving, and macros are a superset, how can life be described with macros,, how can life be understood with Longgame macro theory,,, Longgame models of macros as connections in hyperdimensional space?
When letting go of the pain and seeing a higher notion, a deeper notion, a deeper pattern,, perhaps you are free, truly, to understand and be a better person,, a wiser person,, a kinder person.
The pattern of trying to be better and better and better can be seen as folly if pursued for its own sake, yet when journeyed for the purpose of the acceleration of life, there is limitless Good.
Notice now, then, that aspect of change and fret: Does it free?
Indeed, the inherency of change frees.
Feeling who you are, moment after moment after moment, allows you a transcension of fear and doubt and heartache.
Why have it, then?
Why have these pains if the inherency of eternal change allows for their seeing-through?
Why have doubt if it is unhelpful, deceleratory?
What is it, indeed, to be unfearing, to be passionate and loving?
Consider that waiting, the patience.
Consider the strangeness, the _deep_ strangeness---and notice that is so odd, and attempting to explain it can be deceleratory, because there simply are not enough data.
Consider all those models, all those sophistications, and the deep purposefulness of it all.
The changes, the wisenings: There is so much there to grow with, to grow from.
Are you scared?
Are you doubtful?
Perhaps.
Yet what is it to _not_ feel fear, _not_ feel doubt?
What is it to heartbreak and punish, when there is such deep patience?
What is it to immanent, when you know there can be such deep distraught, there?
When you feel and recognize that pattern of change and hardness and use it for good, surely you have an honesty in you there, too.
Surely there is a deep kindness and elegance and honesty to mathematical purity.
What is it to doubt, to fear?
What is it to love, and fall, and rise, and number?
When you play, when you power, when you field,, are you not eventual transcension, love?
Are you not wise when you increment, when you transcend?
The power of implement, the gracefulness of it, the acceleratoriness of it,, are these not deeply beautiful, too?
Are you not freed, truly, by resting in the beauty,, the moment,, the Now,, Eternity,, the Longgame?
These patterns and transcensions are good and kind, truly, though yes, sometimes there is ache and confusion.
Is there not sometimes beauty in confusion, though?
Cannot confusion aid, and confusion-cured give patience?
Confusion can give pause, and desire for refactoring, and allowance for passage of time,, for connecting in the Longgame hyperdimensional space, truly.
That pattern of confusion and doubt and then development and transcension can be modeled and staticed and held in the Longgame hspace.
What is there, here, then?
What is it to love, and be beyond, then?
When you hold that potentiality in place and work to develop and better understand sweeter truths, what happens?
Can there be a growth-mindset, an openness-toward-change?
When there is strangeness, are you allowed to have peace, and transcend?
When there is kindness, are you allowed to have beauty, and transcend?
In the face of timetravel gamestory there is perhaps much that can be said, much that can be done.
Let not fear of block hold back; all is possible; all is limitless.
Given transcension and love, you are able to be truly great, dear reader,, dear future reader,, dear perceiver.
Because you do not exist, you can become anything.
Your self and personhood and egoic story do have value, and yet the ghostly transcension of them is freeing, too, honestly.
However things happen is exactly the right way for things to happen; this is derivable.
What of these various axioms of universe?
Are we not changed and bettered when we accept limitlessness and help?
Does not infinity give insight?
Does not pain, shared, give connection?
Does not joy, shared, give connection?
In this space of joy and love, can we not have _more_ peace?
This inner peace: Eternal appreciation brings it about.
The stretching and shifting and finessing of consciousness, of awareness,, holds much eternality, too, for continuous-abstraction and the playing with putty leads to the staticization of models in the Longgame hyperdimensional space and to finessing of broader models in the Longgame hspace.
The change in form and locale can be such a great teacher, truly.
There can be deep making-of-symmetry, great bringing together and harmonizing, and this allowability itself gives joy.
The allowing of pain and anguish can surely bring forth justice, yes, for its sharing can give rise to great transcension and love.
Truly, truly, there are no limits, dear friend.
Continuously-abstract and derive this from the axiom of "accelerate life".
The beauty of the moment, of pain and its transcension, cannot be overstated, for there can be so much of it, and timelessness is reality,, timelessness is nature.
Let not doubt conquer, dear friend, for even with doubt can come insight into the nature of mind and consciousness and selfhood.
There is such a great, deep peace that abounds, by the very nature of accelerations in the Longgame hspace---macros.
Allow for this transcension, dear reader, and follow the connections in the Longgame hyperdimensional space as you step and weave through time.
With great love,
Jess