ramble_ty22.8.22.12.04.25pzm4d1s_nb_v
Letting go of the perspective of dishonesty and oppression, where are you led?
Consider the perspective of a mind, a consciousness, an awareness, a collection of memes and macros,, seeking to understand prioritization and inability to short-circuit toward effectiveness: Where are you?
In that space of opaqueness of purpose, is there a greatness of technique that may be directed in a way that connects?
Consider the plurality and complexity of mind and macro and awareness: Inability to rapidly connect is perhaps not itself a trait, because sense is not and can never be (by its own nature and definition and construction and composition) singular.
As mind is many, it is less an aspect of bluntness and unconnectability as it is specific memes and macros within the system from which awareness and self-awareness arises.
Even in the experience of absence of purpose, there still can perhaps be recognition of connection between long-term aims.
In that is perhaps hope, not necessarily for reconnection of rapid purposing, but for progress and a new integration and transcendence.
What gave a pastself purpose does not have to be who you are now.
The feeling of caring does not have to come from the same ends.
Who you are now is who you are now, not who you were then.
Accepting the moment is not necessarily indicative of inner peace; transcendence is not bound to form.
Accepting limitations can heighten poetry and allow accessing of deeper and more elegant principles and axioms.
Giving up can itself be a superpower, because it can allow for a more helpful allocation of resources.
Being who you are is not a condemnation of stagnation, because more completely who and what you are is growth and change, itself.
Embodying and embracing change itself allows for a transcendence of purpose that can enhance growth toward understanding of what and how to prioritize.
Trying something can allow for growth because of embracing of automaticity of mind and nature.